Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

YouTube as a source of information on rhinosinusitis: the good, the bad and the ugly

  • T C Biggs (a1), J H Bird (a2), P G Harries (a1) and R J Salib (a1)

Abstract

Objective:

YouTube is an internet-based repository of user-generated content. This study aimed to determine whether YouTube represented a valid and reliable patient information resource for the lay person on the topic of rhinosinusitis.

Methods:

The study included the first 100 YouTube videos found using the search term ‘sinusitis’. Videos were graded on their ability to inform the lay person on the subject of rhinosinusitis.

Results:

Forty-five per cent of the videos were deemed to provide some useful information. Fifty-five per cent of the videos contained little or no useful facts, 27 per cent of which contained potentially misleading or even dangerous information. Videos uploaded by medical professionals or those from health information websites contained more useful information than those uploaded by independent users.

Conclusion:

YouTube appears to be an unreliable resource for accurate and up to date medical information relating to rhinosinusitis. However, it may provide some useful information if mechanisms existed to direct lay people to verifiable and credible sources.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Mr T Biggs, ENT Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Rd, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK Fax: 0238 0794868 E-mail: tim_biggs@ymail.com

References

Hide All
1Fokkens, WJ, Lund, VJ, Mullol, J, Bachert, C, Alobid, I, Baroody, F et al. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology 2012;50:112
2Suh, JD, Cohen, NA, Palmer, JN. Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;18:2731
3Murray, E, Lo, B, Pollack, L, Donelan, K, Catania, J, White, M et al. The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1727–34
4Moran, M, Oliver, CW. Content and design of patient-targeted websites in orthopaedic surgery: the example of total hip replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007;89:773–6
5Clifton, A, Mann, C. Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Educ Today 2011;31:311–13
6Hughes, JP, Quraishi, MS. YouTube resources for the otolaryngology trainee. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:61–2
7Mishoe, SC. Consumer health care information on the internet: does the public benefit? Respir Care 2008;53:1285–6
8Sethuram, R, Weerakkody, ANA. Health information on the internet. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;30:119–21
9Steinberg, PL, Wason, S, Stern, JM, Deters, L, Kowal, B, Seigne, J. YouTube as source of prostate cancer information. Urology 2010;75:619–22
10Pandey, A, Patni, N, Singh, M, Sood, A, Singh, G. YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:e1–3
11Ache, KA, Wallace, LS. Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube. Am J Prev Med 2008;35:389–92
12Smith, JT, Pate, OL, Guss, D, Lee, JT, Chiodo, CP, Bluman, EM. Internet information quality for ten common foot and ankle diagnoses. Foot Ankle Surg 2012;18:198202
13A pragmatic treatment for chronic sinusitis. In: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAD_qA-rQNY [23 July 2012]
14Briones, R, Nan, X, Madden, K, Waks, L. When vaccines go viral: an analysis of HPV vaccine coverage on YouTube. Health Commun 2012;27:478–85
15Singh, AG, Singh, S, Singh, PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis – a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 2012;39:899903
16Pant, S, Deshmukh, A, Murugiah, K, Kumar, G, Sachdeva, R, Mehta, JL. Assessing the credibility of the “YouTube approach” to health information on acute myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol 2012;35:281–5

Keywords

YouTube as a source of information on rhinosinusitis: the good, the bad and the ugly

  • T C Biggs (a1), J H Bird (a2), P G Harries (a1) and R J Salib (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed