Skip to main content Accessibility help

Vocal fold paresis – a debilitating and underdiagnosed condition

  • G Harris (a1), C O'Meara (a1), C Pemberton (a1), J Rough (a2), P Darveniza (a3), S Tisch (a3) and I Cole (a1)...



To review the clinical signs of vocal fold paresis on laryngeal videostroboscopy, to quantify its impact on patients’ quality of life and to confirm the benefit of laryngeal electromyography in its diagnosis.


Twenty-nine vocal fold paresis patients were referred for laryngeal electromyography. Voice Handicap Index 10 results were compared to 43 patients diagnosed with vocal fold paralysis. Laryngeal videostroboscopy analysis was conducted to determine side of paresis.


Blinded laryngeal electromyography confirmed vocal fold paresis in 92.6 per cent of cases, with vocal fold lag being the most common diagnostic sign. The laryngology team accurately predicted side of paresis in 76 per cent of cases. Total Voice Handicap Index 10 responses were not significantly different between vocal fold paralysis and vocal fold paresis groups (26.08 ± 0.21 and 22.93 ± 0.17, respectively).


Vocal fold paresis has a significant impact on quality of life. This study shows that laryngeal electromyography is an important diagnostic tool. Patients with persisting dysphonia and apparently normal vocal fold movement, who fail to respond to appropriate speech therapy, should be investigated for a diagnosis of vocal fold paresis.


Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Dr Georgina Harris, PO BOX 4024, Royal North Shore Hospital, NSW 2065, Australia E-mail:


Hide All

Presented at the Australian Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Annual Scientific Meeting, 7–10 March 2015, Sydney, and at the 2nd Australasian and Asia Pacific Laryngology Conference, 7–9 November 2014, Hobart, Australia.



Hide All
1 Sulica, L. Vocal fold paresis: an evolving clinical concept. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 2013;1:158–62
2 Simpson, CB, Cheung, EJ, Jackson, CJ. Vocal fold paresis: clinical and electrophysiologic features in a tertiary laryngology practice. J Voice 2009;23:396–8
3 Sataloff, RT, Praneetvatakul, P, Heuer, RJ, Hawkshaw, MJ, Heman-Ackah, YD, Schneider, SM et al. Laryngeal electromyography: clinical application. J Voice 2010;24:228–34
4 Sataloff, RT, Abaza, M, Mandel, S, Manon-Espaillat, R. Laryngeal electromyography. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;8:524–9
5 Min, YB, Finnegan, EM, Hoffman, HT, Luschei, ES, McCulloch, TA. A preliminary study of the prognostic role of electromyography in laryngeal paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;111:770–5
6 Woo, P. Laryngeal electromyography is a cost-effective clinically useful tool in the evaluation of vocal fold function. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:472–5
7 Koufman, JA, Postma, GN, Cummins, MM, Blalock, PD. Vocal fold paresis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:537–41
8 Syamal, MN, Benninger, MS. Vocal fold paresis: a review of clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, and prognostic indicators. Current Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;24:197202
9 Rosen, CA, Lee, AS, Osborne, J, Zullo, T, Murray, T. Development and validation of the Voice Handicap Index-10. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1549–56
10 Heman-Ackah, YD, Barr, A. Mild vocal fold paresis: understanding clinical presentation and electromyographic findings. J Voice 2006;20:269–81
11 Rubin, AD, Praneetvatakul, V, Heman-Ackah, Y, Moyer, CA, Mandel, S, Sataloff, RT. Repetitive phonatory tasks for identifying vocal fold paresis. J Voice 2005;19:679–86
12 Simpson, CB, May, LS, Green, JK, Eller, RL, Jackson, CE. Vibratory asymmetry in mobile vocal folds: is it predictive of vocal fold paresis? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011;120:239–42
13 Sulica, L, Blitzer, A. Vocal fold paresis: evidence and controversies. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;15:159–62
14 Stager, SV, Bielamowicz, SA. Using laryngeal electromyography to differentiate presbylarynges from paresis. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2010;53:100–13


Vocal fold paresis – a debilitating and underdiagnosed condition

  • G Harris (a1), C O'Meara (a1), C Pemberton (a1), J Rough (a2), P Darveniza (a3), S Tisch (a3) and I Cole (a1)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed