Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Variation in surgical methods used for total laryngectomy in Australia

  • J Maclean (a1), S Cotton (a2) and A Perry (a3)

Abstract

Deglutition disorders (dysphagia) are common following total laryngectomy. As the aetiology of the disorder is poorly understood, its incidence is probably under-estimated. Dysphagia may result from many factors, including the type of laryngectomy surgery employed and the use of adjuvant treatments (e.g. radiotherapy and chemotherapy). Dysphagia may also be compounded by other co-morbid factors, such as ageing and depression.

Aim:

To investigate the methods of surgical closure used by Australian ENT and head and neck surgeons after undertaking total laryngectomy surgery.

Method:

In order to audit surgical variation, 56 short questionnaires were sent to all Australian ENT and head and neck surgeons who were registered members of the Australia and New Zealand Head and Neck Society. Twenty-eight questionnaires (50 per cent) were completed and returned.

Results:

Respondents reported using a variety of different reconstructive methods after total laryngectomy surgery. Specifically, there were differences in the type and levels of pharyngeal closure employed and the suturing techniques used.

Conclusion:

Currently, there is no scientific evidence to direct surgeons to the optimal pharyngeal reconstruction technique(s) ensuring for good swallowing results post-laryngectomy. An analysis of the effect of surgical reconstruction technique on laryngectomees' post-operative swallowing ability is needed, in order to provide evidence to determine optimal surgical techniques.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Ms Julia Maclean, Cancer Care Centre, St George Hospital, Short St, Kogarah, NSW, Australia 2217. Fax: +61 2 9113 3935 E-mail: Julia.Maclean@sesiahs.health.nsw.gov.au

Footnotes

Hide All

Presented as a poster at the European Group for Functional Reconstruction after Laryngectomy meeting was held June 9–12 2007, the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Australian and New Zealand Head and Neck Society was held July 26–28 2007, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1 Ward, EC, Bishop, B, Frisby, J, Stevens, M. Swallowing outcomes following laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:181–6
2 Freeman, SB, Hamaker, RC. Tracheosophageal voice restoration at the time of laryngectomy. In: Blom, ED, Singer, MI, Hamaker, RC, eds. Tracheoesophageal Voice Restoration Following Total Laryngectomy. San Diego, California: Singular Publishing, 1998;1925
3 Hamaker, RC, Cheesman, AD. Surgical management of pharyngeal constrictor muscle hypertonicity. In: Blom, ED, Singer, MI, Hamaker, RC, eds. Tracheoesophageal Voice Restoration Following Total Laryngectomy. San Diego, California: Singular Publishing, 1998;33–9
4 Edels, Y. Pseudo-voice: its theory and practice. In: Edels, Y, ed. Laryngectomy: Diagnosis to Rehabilitation. London: Croom-Helm, 1983;107–42
5 Dantas, RO, Aguiar-Ricz, LN, Gielow, I, Filho, FVM, Mamede, RCM. Proximal esophageal contractions in laryngectomized patients. Dysphagia 2005;20:101–4
6 Cook, IJ. Disorders causing oropharyngeal dysphagia. In: Castell, DO, Richter, JE, eds. Esophagus, 4th edn. Pennsylvania: Lipcott Williams & Wilkins, 2002;196220
7 Lindgren, M, Janzon, L. Prevalence of swallowing complaints and clinical findings among 50–79 year old men and women in an urban population. Dysphagia 1991;6:187–92
8 Boyd, GM, Brodsky, MB, Day, TA, Lee, F, Martin-Harris, B. Swallowing-related quality of life after head and neck cancer treatment. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1362–7
9 Cole, I, Miller, S. Total laryngectomy with primary voice restoration. Aust N Z J Surg 1993;63:468–70
10 Portney, LG, Watkins, MP. Surveys. In: Portney, LG, Watkins, MP. Foundations of Clinical Research Applications to Practice, 2nd edn. NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000; 285316

Keywords

Variation in surgical methods used for total laryngectomy in Australia

  • J Maclean (a1), S Cotton (a2) and A Perry (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed