Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Value of head and neck cancer incidence data on UK cancer registry websites: a comparison

  • A M Khan (a1) and A Tomkinson (a2)

Abstract

We evaluated the relative usefulness of data on head and neck cancer available on the websites of cancer registries in the United Kingdom. Data were analysed to determine the accuracy and completeness of essential information related to the incidence of head and neck cancer.

We found that 16 per cent (2/11) of the registries had some cancer data but none relating to head and neck cancer patients. Seventy-five per cent (9/12) of the registries had selected data on head and neck cancer, but 33 per cent (3/9) of these pooled the various head and neck cancers into a single group. The remainder of registries offering data [66 per cent (6/9)] had a variety of ways of grouping and presenting the various types of head and neck cancer. The overall value and usefulness of head and neck cancer information on these websites were limited, especially when all the sites were considered together.

The cancer registries collectively possess an extremely important asset of immense value to both the medical profession and, possibly, patients with cancer. The accessibility of this data and the overall experience of those seeking information on this subject could be improved. However, this would require significant thought, collaboration and agreement between each registry, which would involve significant extra investment.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Mr A M Khan, 4 Clos Y Gwadd, Thornhill, Cardiff CF14 9DZ, Wales, UK. Fax: 01633257191 E-mail: anwar_moin@yahoo.com

Footnotes

Hide All

Presented at the Quincentenary Congress of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, 1 July 2005, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
1Northern and Yorkshire Cancer Registry. http://www.nycris.org.uk/ [11 December 2004]
2Thames Cancer Registry. http://www.thames-cancer-reg.org.uk/default.htm [11 December 2004]
3Trent Cancer Registry. http://www.trentcancer.nhs.uk/introduction.html [18 October 2004]
4Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit. http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites/home.cfm?OrgID=242 [11 December 2004]
5Northern Ireland Cancer Registry. http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/docdat/records.php?t=records&id=NICR [11 December 2004]
6West Midlands Cancer Intelligence Unit. http://www.wmpho.org.uk/wmciu/ [11 December 2004]
7South and West Cancer Intelligence Service. http://www.theswcis.nhs.uk/ [11 December 2004]
8Scottish Cancer Registry. http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/docdat/records.php?t=records&id=SCR [11 December 2004]
9Merseyside & Cheshire Cancer Registry. http://www.mccr.nhs.uk/welcome.asp [11 December 2004]
10Oxford Cancer Intelligence Unit Cancer Registry. http://www.lshtm.ac.uk/docdat/records.php?t=records_pfv&id=OCIUCR [3 December 2004]
11Eastern Cancer Registration and Information Centre. http://www.ecric.org.uk/ [11 December 2004]
12North Western Cancer Registry. http://www.ukacr.org.uk/Contacts/connwcr.htm [9 September 2004]
14Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. http://www.aihw.gov.au/cancer/faqs.html#s01 [15 September 2004]
16Reducing risk improving outcome in cancer. http://www.nycris.org.uk/reports/ukacr.pdf [11 December 2004]
17Junghans, TB, Sevin, IF, Ionin, B, Seifried, H. Cancer information resources: digital and online sources. Toxicology 2004;198:177–93
18Pal, SK, Pandey, GSK, Kesari, A, Choudhuri, G, Mittal, B. Fighting cancer in the information age: the role of Internet. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 2003;41:189200
19Ross, J, Chapman, C, Murray, C, Stevenson, M, Natin, D, Rogstad, K. How much interest is the Internet to patients? Sex Transm Infect 2000;76:393–4
20McColl, I. Dermatology education on the Web. J Telemed Telecare 2003;9(suppl 2):S33–5
21Mandikos, MN. The Internet in dentistry – bringing world class education to your home. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg 2002;16:58–9
22Zbar, RI, Otake, LR, Miller, MJ, Persing, JA, Dingman, DL. Web-based medicine as a means to establish centers of surgical excellence in the developing world. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:460–5
23Chen, HS, Guo, FR, Lee, RG, Lin, CC, Chen, JH, Chen, CY et al. Recent advances in telemedicine. J Formos Med Assoc 1999;98:767–72
24Gorriz, C, Gonzalez, FM, Trinidad, A, Garcia, JR, Pinilla, MT, Lopez Cortijo, C et al. Use of the Internet in otorhinolaryngology [in Spanish]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 1997;48:255–9
25Liang, WY, O'Grady, P. The Internet and medical collaboration using virtual reality. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2003;27:525–34
26Bassignani, MJ, Dwyer, SJ 3rd, Ciambotti, JM, Olazagasti, JM, Moran, R, Moynihan, S et al. Review of technology: planning for the development of telesonography. J Digit Imaging 2004;17:1827
27Ziebland, S. The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the Internet. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1783–93
28Bazzoli, F. The allure of the Internet. Health Data Manag 1995;3:24–6, 28, 30–2
29Chestnutt, IG. Internet-derived patient information on common oral pathologies: is it readable? Primary Dental Care 2004;11:51–4

Keywords

Value of head and neck cancer incidence data on UK cancer registry websites: a comparison

  • A M Khan (a1) and A Tomkinson (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed