Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Contents:

Information:

  • Access

Actions:

      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Understanding long-term outcomes requires prospective data collection
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Understanding long-term outcomes requires prospective data collection
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Understanding long-term outcomes requires prospective data collection
        Available formats
        ×
Export citation

The rise of ‘big data’ in medical research, including genetics, should help us understand more fully the natural history and prevalence of disorders and what can be expected from our interventions, and so help us counsel our patients. Obtaining data for accreditation and revalidation purposes is a bonus, but of secondary importance. Agreement on what data need to be collected prospectively for audit, research, billing and outcomes is not easy, and is compounded by communication difficulties between clinicians and administrative coding staff. This Journal of Laryngology & Otology issue contains an article that looks at septal surgery and nasal trauma patients, and the experience of a team who liaised closely with their coding team to identify and correct problems in communication and resulting errors. 1 The problems identified are likely to be widely applicable, not just to this patient group or this institution. This study complements articles in recent issues on the efficacy of common ENT procedures 2 and wide data collection on quinsy management. 3

Myringoplasty outcomes nationally and in local centres has been a prominent topic in recent Journal editions. 4 , 5 This month's issue contains an article investigating revision myringoplasty outcomes. 6 It showed that revision surgery and primary surgery had similar outcomes in that particular centre, which was helpful in that hospital when counselling patients pre-operatively.

Voice and swallowing problems in patients with Parkinson's disease crop up in the clinic occasionally, but the literature contains few sizeable series. This issue reports on a series of 13 patients from a tertiary voice clinic in Lewisham, which provides the basis for a strategy to help these often-neglected patients. 7

Epistaxis is a major reason for acute admission to ENT wards, and the rise of anti-coagulation use in the management of cardiac disorders has exacerbated the problem. The article by Flood and colleagues in this issue examines every aspect of the evidence in relation to the use of endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation, 8 which has become a mainstay of treatment, albeit with some variation in indications and in treatment algorithms. This analysis complements views from other recent Journal contributions on the topic. 9 , 10 A forthcoming Journal ‘virtual issue’ will focus on epistaxis.

References

1 Nouraei, SA, Hudovsky, A, Virk, J, Saleh, HA. Impact of developing a multidisciplinary coded dataset standard on administrative data accuracy for septoplasty, septorhinoplasty and nasal trauma surgery. J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:341–6
2 Seymour, N. How effective are common ENT operations? J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:622–6
3 ENT Trainee Research Collaborative—West Midlands. National prospective cohort study of peritonsillar abscess management and outcomes: the Multicentre Audit of Quinsies study. J Laryngol Otol 2016;130:768–76
4 Phillips, JS, Yung, MW, Nunney, I. Myringoplasty outcomes in the UK. J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:860–4
5 Carr, SD, Strachan, DR, Raine, CH. Factors affecting myringoplasty success. J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:23–6
6 Prinsley, P. Results of revision myringoplasty: are they different to primary myringoplasty? J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:316–8
7 Gibbins, N, Awad, R, Harris, S, Aymat, A. The diagnosis, clinical findings and treatment options for Parkinson's disease patients attending a tertiary referral voice clinic. J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:357–62
8 Ellinas, A, Jervis, P, Kenyon, G, Flood, LM. Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation for acute idiopathic epistaxis. Does anatomical variation and a limited evidence base raise questions regarding its place in management? J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:290–7
9 Hall, AC, Blanchford, H, Chatrath, P, Hopkins, C. A multi-centre audit of epistaxis management in England: is there a case for a national review of practice? J Laryngol Otol 2015;129:454–7
10 Fox, R, Nash, R, Liu, ZW, Singh, A. Epistaxis management: current understanding amongst junior doctors. J Laryngol Otol 2016;130:252–5