Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T03:52:46.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A three-array cochlear implant: a new approach for the ossified cochlea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

H. C. Richardson ,
M. Beliaeff ,
G. Clarke  and
M. Hawthorne
H. C. Richardson*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, North Riding Infirmary, Middlesbrough, UK
M. Beliaeff
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, North Riding Infirmary, Middlesbrough, UK
G. Clarke
Affiliation:
Department of Laboratoires MXM, Vallauris, France.
M. Hawthorne
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, North Riding Infirmary, Middlesbrough, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Miss H. Richardson, Department of ENT, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland SR4 7TP.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ossified cochlea, although rare, represents a challenge for cochlear implantation. While it is no longer considered an absolute contra-indication to implantation, insertion may be technically difficult and the results may be suboptimal. Techniques which have been employed are reviewed. The new Digisonic™ multi-array implant, which was designed specifically for use in the ossified cochlea is described, along with the technique used for its insertion.

In the first patient to be implanted with this new implant, all electrodes lie within the cochlea and are functional. The new Digisonic™ multi-array implant may have advantages over other solutions for the ossified cochlea.

Keywords

Cochlear implantOssification, pathological
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 113 , Issue 9 , September 1999 , pp. 811 - 814
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balkany, T. J. (1990) Endoscopy of the cochlea during cochlear implantation. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 99: 919–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balkany, T. J., Driesbach, J. D., Cohen, N. L., Valvassori, G. (1987) Surgical anatomy and radiographic imaging of cochlear implant candidates. American Journal of Otology 8: 195–200.Google Scholar
Balkany, T. J., Gantz, B. J., Steenerson, R. L., Cohen, N. L. (1996) Systemic approach to electrode insertion in the ossified cochlea. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery 114: 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chouard, C. H., Genin, J., Meyer, B., Fugain, C., Monneron, L., Dubus, P., Leveau, J. M. (1990) L'implant cochleaire monocanal numerique ‘Monosonic’. Annales d'Oto-laryngologie et de Chirurgie-Cervicofaciale (Paris)107: 430–437.Google ScholarPubMed
Chouard, C. H., Meyer, B., Fugain, C., Ouriemi, R. (1995) Implants cochleaires et cochlees totalement obstruees. Annales d'Oto-laryngologie et de Chirurgie-Cervicofaciale (Paris) 112: 12–19.Google Scholar
Gantz, B. J., McCabe, B. F., Tyler, R. S. (1988) The use of multichannel cochlear implants in obstructed and obliterated cochleae. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery 98(1): 72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar