Skip to main content Accessibility help

Hearing outcomes of vestibular schwannoma patients managed with ‘wait and scan’: predictive value of hearing level at diagnosis

  • S-E Stangerup (a1), M Tos (a1), J Thomsen (a1) and P Caye-Thomasen (a1)



This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of both hearing level (at various frequencies) and speech discrimination for forecasting hearing outcome after a period of observation, in patients with vestibular schwannoma.


Over a 33-year period, 1144 patients with vestibular schwannoma were allocated to ‘wait and scan’ management, with annual magnetic resonance imaging and audiological examination. Two complete pure tone and speech discrimination audiograms were available for 932 patients.


The predictive value of initial hearing level better than 10 dB for forecasting hearing outcome after observation increased from 59 per cent at 250 Hz to 94 percent at 4000 Hz. At diagnosis, hearing level of 10 dB or better at 4000 Hz was found in only 18 of the 932 VS ears, while good speech discrimination was found in 159 patients (17 per cent). Of the latter patients, 138 maintained good hearing after observation.


In vestibular schwannoma patients, good high frequency hearing and good speech discrimination at diagnosis are useful tools in predicting good hearing after observation.


Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Associate Professor Sven-Eric Stangerup, ENT Department, Gentofte University Hospital, Niels Andersens vej 65, 2900 Hellerup, Copenhagen, Denmark. Fax: +45 48 24 76 13 E-mail:


Hide All
1Kaylie, DM, Gilbert, E, Horgan, MA, Delashaw, JB, McMenomey, SO. Acoustic neuroma surgery outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:686–9
2Gormley, WB, Sekhar, LN, Wright, DC, Kamerer, D, Schessel, D. Acoustic neuromas: results of current surgical management. Neurosurgery 1997;41:50–8
3Martin, TP, Tzifa, K, Kowalski, C, Holder, RL, Walsh, R, Irving, RM. Conservative versus primary surgical treatment of acoustic neuromas: a comparison of rates of facial nerve and hearing preservation. Clin Otolaryngol 2008;33:228–35
4Smouha, EE, Yoo, M, Mohr, K, Davis, RP. Conservative management of acoustic neuroma: a meta-analysis and proposed treatment algorithm. Laryngoscope 2005;115:450–4
5Meyer, TA, Canty, PA, Wilkinson, EP, Hansen, MR, Rubinstein, JT, Gantz, BJ. Small acoustic neuromas: surgical outcomes versus observation or radiation. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:380–92
6Evans, DG, Birch, JM, Ramsden, RT, Sharif, S, Baser, ME. Malignant transformation and new primary tumours after therapeutic radiation for benign disease: substantial risks in certain tumour prone syndromes. J Med Genet 2006;43:289–94
7Shin, M, Ueki, K, Kurita, H, Kirino, T. Malignant transformation of a vestibular schwannoma after gamma knife radiosurgery. Lancet 2002;360:309–10
8Stangerup, SE, Caye-Thomasen, P, Tos, M, Thomsen, J. Change in hearing during ‘wait and scan’ management of patients with vestibular schwannoma. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:673–81
9Kanzaki, J, Tos, M, Sanna, M, Moffat, DA, Monsell, EM, Berliner, KI. New and modified reporting systems from the consensus meeting on systems for reporting results in vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:642–8
10Rosenberg, SI. Natural history of acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope 2000;110:497508


Hearing outcomes of vestibular schwannoma patients managed with ‘wait and scan’: predictive value of hearing level at diagnosis

  • S-E Stangerup (a1), M Tos (a1), J Thomsen (a1) and P Caye-Thomasen (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed