Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:00:06.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors associated with recurrence of cholesteatoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Eero Vartiainen
Eero Vartiainen*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland.
*
Dr Eero Vartiainen, Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital of Kuopio, FIN-70210 Kuopio, Finland. Fax: 358-71-172509
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After a mean follow-up period of 7.3 years, a recurrence was found in 43 (12.3 percent) out of 349 consecutive patients undergoing surgical treatment for acquired cholesteatoma. The great majority of residual cholesteatomas detected in the ‘second-look’ operations arose from the oval window area.Chronic otorrhoea and a reperforation were the most common signs of late recurrences. In eight ears a recurrent cholesteatoma developed from a retraction pocket. The recurrence rate was higher in children than in adults. The type of surgical technique had no significant effect on recurrence rate. Recurrences were more frequent in pre-operatively discharging ears than in dry ears. Some suggestions have been made to improve the results of surgery for cholesteatoma.

Keywords

Otitis mediasuppurativeCholesteatomaMastoid, surgery
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 109 , Issue 7 , July 1995 , pp. 590 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cody, D. T. R., McDonald, T. J. (1984) Mastoidectomy for acquired cholesteatoma: follow-up to 20 years. Laryngoscope 94: 1027–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelstein, D. R., Parisier, S. C. (1989) Surgical techniques and recidivism in cholesteatoma. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 22: 1029–1040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glasscock, E., Dickins, E., Wiet, R. (1981) Cholesteatoma in children. Laryngoscope 91: 1743–1753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercke, U. (1986) Anatomic findings one year after combined approach tympanoplasty. American Journal of Otology 7: 150–154.Google ScholarPubMed
Parisier, S. C., Edelstein, D. R., Bindra, G. S., Han, J. G, Chute, P. (1988) Is cholesteatoma the same disease in children and adults? Transactions of the American Otological Society 76: 161–166.Google Scholar
Quaranta, A., Cassano, P., Carbonara, G. (1988) Cholesteatoma surgery: open versus closed tympanoplasty. American Journal of Otology 9: 229–231.Google Scholar
Sade, J. (1993) Treatment of cholesteatoma and retraction pockets. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 250: 193–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanna, M., Zini, C., Scandellari, R., Jemmi, G. (1984) Residual and recurrent cholesteatoma in closed tympanoplasty. American Journal of Otology 5: 277–282.Google ScholarPubMed
Todd, N. W., Heindel, N. H., PerLee, J. H. (1994) Bony anatomy of the anterior epitympanic space. Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Its Related Specialties 56: 146–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yung, M. W. (1994) The use of rigid endoscopes in cholesteatoma surgery. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 108: 307–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed