Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T06:04:26.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early surgical intervention for nasal deformity in Binder's syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

B Baser ,
P Singh ,
P Surana ,
P K Roy  and
P Chaubey
B Baser*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences (‘SAIMS’), Indore, India Department of ENT, Jaslok Hospital, Mumbai, India Department of ENT, Akash Hospital, Indore, India
P Singh
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Akash Hospital, Indore, India
P Surana
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences (‘SAIMS’), Indore, India
P K Roy
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences (‘SAIMS’), Indore, India
P Chaubey
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Akash Hospital, Indore, India Department of ENT, Civil Hospital, Panchkula, India
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Brajendra Baser, Department of ENT, Akash Hospital, Bicholi Mardana Main Road, Indore452016, Madhya Pradesh, India E-mail: baserbv@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To assess benefits of surgical intervention at an early age and focus on surgical techniques using exclusively autologous cartilage grafts.

Methods

Five children aged 8–15 years, treated between March 2016 and 2020, underwent augmentation rhinoplasty using autologous cartilage, with post-operative follow up ranging from 1.5 to 2 years. Photographs and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire scores were examined.

Results

Augmentation was achieved without complications. No restricted skin or mucosal pockets were encountered. Patients showed improved confidence and perspective with regard to self-image, and were less socially self-conscious. There was significant improvement in all Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire scores.

Conclusion

Early surgery allows augmentation with easier release of skin and mucosal pockets, and without the tension otherwise encountered if primary augmentation is performed at a later age. It offers a chance to improve confidence and self-perception in a growing child conscious about their appearance, which may make them socially withdrawn. Autologous cartilage gives better results than bone grafts, and is comparable with silicone but without its complications.

Keywords

Binder's SyndromeMaxillonasal DysplasiaNose Deformities, CongenitalPediatric RhinoplastyPatient Satisfaction
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 136 , Issue 2 , February 2022 , pp. 146 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr B Baser takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Olow-Nordenram, M, Sjöberg, S, Thilander, B. The craniofacial morphology in individuals with maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder's syndrome): a cross-sectional cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:53–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draf, W, Bockmühl, U, Hoffmann, B. Nasal correction in maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder's syndrome): a long term follow-up study. Br J Plast Surg 2003;56:199–204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmström, H. Clinical and pathological features of maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder's syndrome): significance of the prenatal fossa on etiology. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:559–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaire, J, Tessier, P, Tulasne, JF, Resche, F. Clinical and radiologic aspects of maxillonasal dysostosis (Binder syndrome). Head Neck Surg 1980;3:105–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, JW, Thompson, RPJ. Maxillonasal dysostosis (Binder syndrome): a review of the literature and case reports. Eur J Orthod 1985;7:145–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horswell, BB, Holmes, AD, Levant, BA, Barnett, JS. Cephalometric and anthropomorphic observations of Binder's syndrome: a study of 19 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:325–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binder, KH. Maxillo-nasalis dysostosis, an archinencephalic malformation complex [in German]. Deut Zahnaerztl Zschr 1962;17:438–44Google Scholar
Coughlin, WT. A new procedure for the relief of facies scaphoidea - dish face. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1925;40:109–11Google Scholar
Ragnell, A. A simple method of reconstruction in some cases of dish-face deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1952;10:227–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noyes, FB. Case report. Angle Orthod 1939;9:160–5Google Scholar
Hopkin, GB. Hypoplasia of middle third of the face associated with congenital absence of the anterior nasal spine, depression of the nasal bones and angle class III - malocclusion. Br J Plast Surg 1963;16:146–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy-Doray, B, Geraudel, A, Alembik, Y, Stoll, C. Binder syndrome in a mother and her son. Genet Couns 1997;8:227–33Google Scholar
Olow-Nordenram, M, Valentin, J. An etiologic study of maxillonasal dysplasia–Binder's syndrome. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:69–74Google ScholarPubMed
Gorlin, RJ, Pindborg, JJ. Syndromes of the Head and Neck. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964;51–69Google Scholar
Converse, JM. Technique of bone grafting for contour restoration of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 1954;14:332–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Converse, JM, Horowitz, SL, Valauri, AJ, Montandon, D. The treatment of nasomaxillary hypoplasia. A new pyramidal naso-orbital maxillary osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970;45:527–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obwegeser, HL. Surgical correction of small or retrodisplaced maxillae. The “dish-face” deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;43:351–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhatt, YC, Vyas, KA, Tandale, MS, Panse, NS, Bakshi, HS, Srivastava, RK. Maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder's syndrome) and its treatment with costal cartilage graft: a follow-up study. Indian J Plast Surg 2008;41:151–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sajjadian, A, Naghshineh, N, Rubinstein, R. Current status of grafts and implants in rhinoplasty: Part II. Homologous grafts and allogenic implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:99–109eCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ham, J, Miller, PJ. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene implants in rhinoplasty: literature review, operative techniques, and outcome. Facial Plast Surg 2003;19:331–40Google ScholarPubMed
Henderson, D, Jackson, IT. Naso-maxillary hypoplasis—the Le Fort II osteotomy. Br J Oral Surg 1973;11:77–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, AD, Lee, SJ, Greensmith, A, Heggie, A, Meara, JG. Nasal reconstruction for maxillonasal dysplasia. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:543–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmström, H, Gewalli, F. Long-term behavior of three different grafts in nasomaxillary reconstruction of binder syndrome: an analysis by digitalized measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122:1524–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmström, H. Surgical correction of the nose and midface in maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder's syndrome). Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;78:568–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingman, RO, Walter, C. Use of composite ear grafts in correction of the short nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;43:117–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Losken, HW, Morris, WM, Uys, PB. Le Fort II osteotomy in the treatment of maxillonasal dysostosis (Binder's syndrome). S Afr J Surg 1988;26:88–9Google Scholar
Jackson, IT, Moos, KF, Sharpe, DT. Total surgical management of Binder's syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 1981;7:25–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epsteen, CM. Psychological impact of facial deformities. Am J Surg 1958;96:745–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacGregor, FC. Social and psychological implications of dentofacial disfigurement. Angle Orthod 1970;40:231–3Google ScholarPubMed
Lansdown, R, Lloyd, J, Hunter, J. Facial deformity in childhood: severity and psychological adjustment. Child Care Health Dev 1991;17:165–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monasterio, FO, Molina, F, McClintock, JS. Nasal correction in Binder's syndrome: the evolution of a treatment plan. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1997;21:299–308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tessier, P, Tulasne, JF, Delaire, J, Resche, F. Therapeutic aspects of maxillonasal dysostosis (Binder syndrome). Head Neck Surg 1981;3:207–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, RC, Chen, YR. Surgical management of Binder's syndrome: lessons learned. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010;34:722–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamani, VR, Ghosh, S, Tirunagari, S. Nasal correction in nasomaxillary hypoplasia (Binder's syndrome): an optimised classification and treatment. Indian J Plast Surg 2016;49:314–21Google ScholarPubMed
Ortiz-Monasterio, F, Olmedo, A. Corrective rhinoplasty before puberty: a long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;68:381–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Hakim, H, Crysdale, WS, Abdollel, M, Farkas, LG. A study of anthropometric measures before and after external septoplasty in children: a preliminary study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1362–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carach, B, Woods, M, Scott, P. Maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder syndrome): a lateral cephalometric assessment. Aust Orthod J 2002;18:82–91Google ScholarPubMed
Munro, IR, Sinclair, WJ, Rudd, NL. Maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder's syndrome). Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;63:657–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posnick, JC, Tompson, B. Binder syndrome: staging of reconstruction and skeletal stability and relapse patterns after LeFort I osteotomy using miniplate fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99:961–73Google Scholar
Watanabe, T, Matsuo, K. Augmentation with cartilage grafts around the pyriform aperture to improve the midface and profile in binder's syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 1996;36:206–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rune, B, Aberg, M. Bone grafts to the nose in Binder's syndrome (maxillonasal dysplasia): a follow-up of eleven patients with the use of profile roentgenograms. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losken, HW, Morris, WM. Skull bone grafts in the treatment of maxillonasal dysostosis (Binder's syndrome). S Afr J Surg 1988;26:90–4Google Scholar
Horswell, BB, Holmes, AD, Barnett, JS, Levant, BA. Maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder's syndrome): a critical review and case study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:114–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vuyk, HD, Adamson, PA. Biomaterials in rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1998;23:209–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staffel, G, Shockley, W. Nasal implants. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995;28:295–308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tian, L, You, J, Wang, H, Zhang, B, Xu, Y, Lu, X et al. Comparison of two different grafts in nasal framework reconstruction of Binder syndrome: cartilage and silicone. J Craniofac Surg 2017;28:1413–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, JP. Grafts in rhinoplasty: alloplastic vs autogenous. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:558–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collawn, SS, Fix, RJ, Moore, JR, Vasconez, LO. Nasal cartilage grafts: more than a decade of experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:1547–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tardy, ME Jr, Denneny, J 3rd, Fritsch, MH. The versatile cartilage autograft in reconstruction of the nose and face. Laryngoscope 1985;95:523–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardy, ME, Thomas, JR, Roeder, J, Fitzpatrick, ME. Reconstructive Surgery of the Deviated Septum and Nose. Irvington, NJ: Richards Manufacturing, 1982;1–19Google Scholar
Brent, B. The acquired auricular deformity. A systematic approach to its analysis and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1977;59:475–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, H. Cartilage and cartilage grafts: the basic properties of the tissue and the components responsible for them. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967;40:426–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, T, Davis, WB. The distortion of autogenous cartilage grafts: its cause and prevention. Br J Plast Surg 1957;10:257–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, A, Munro, I. The role of psychiatry in a craniofacial team. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;61:564–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar