Skip to main content Accessibility help

Comparison of radiofrequency and monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy

  • F Aksoy (a1), O Ozturan (a1), B Veyseller (a1), Y S Yildirim (a1) and H Demirhan (a1)...



To compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency and monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy, regarding operation duration and tonsillectomy morbidity, including post-operative pain and haemorrhage and tonsillar fossa healing, in patients with recurrent chronic tonsillitis.

Study design:

A prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical study.


Fifty patients aged over 10 years who required tonsillectomy were randomly assigned to have one tonsil removed by radiofrequency and the other by monopolar electrocautery. Operation duration, post-operative haemorrhage, post-operative pain and tonsillar fossa wound healing were compared.


The mean ± standard deviation of the operation duration required for the radiofrequency method was significantly longer than that for monopolar electrocautery: 8.1 ± 1.6 minutes vs 7.3 ± 1.5 minutes, respectively (p = 0.034). Post-operative haemorrhage was observed in only three patients (13.6 per cent). Inter-group analysis showed no significant differences in post-operative pain scores for the radiofrequency vs monopolar electrocautery methods (3.7 ± 1.6 vs 3.3 ± 1.4, respectively; p < 0.126). Inter-group analysis showed that tonsillar fossa wound healing scores evaluated on the fifth, 10th and 14th post-operative days were significantly higher in the radiofrequency group compared with the monopolar electrocautery group (p < 0.001).


The present study results indicated that monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy was superior to radiofrequency tonsillectomy in terms of post-operative tonsillar fossa wound healing; however, both techniques were comparable in terms of post-operative pain.


Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Dr Yavuz Selim Yildirim, Haseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Kulak Burun Boğaz Kliniği, 34089 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey. Fax: +90 212 5103701 E-mail:


Hide All
1Ragab, SM. Bipolar radiofrequency dissection tonsillectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133:961–5
2Tan, AKL, Hsu, PP, Eng, SP, Ng, YH, Lu, PK, Tan, SM et al. Coblation vs electrocautery tonsillectomy: postoperative recovery in adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:699703
3Parsons, SP, Cordes, SR, Comer, B. Comparison of posttonsillectomy pain using the ultrasonic scalpel, coblator and electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:106–13
4Friedman, M, LoSavio, P, Ibrahim, H, Ramakrishnan, V. Radiofrequency tonsil reduction: safety, morbidity, and efficacy. Laryngoscope 2003;113:882–7
5Magdy, EA, Elwany, S, Al-Daly, AS, Abdel-Hadi, M, Morshedy, MA. Coblation tonsillectomy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, clinical and histopathological comparison with dissection-ligation, monopolar electrocautery and laser tonsillectomies. J Laryngol Otol 2008;122:282–90
6Noordzij, JP, Affleck, BD. Coblation versus unipolar electrocautery tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study in adult patients. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1303–9
7Littlefield, PD, Hall, DJ, Holtel, MR. Radiofrequency excision versus monopolar electrosurgical excision for tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133:51–4
8Shah, UK, Galinkin, J, Chiavacci, R, Briggs, M. Tonsillectomy by means of plasma mediated ablation. Prospective, randomized, blinded comparison with monopolar surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:672–6
9Bäck, L, Paloheimo, M, Ylikoski, J. Traditional tonsillectomy compared with bipolar radiofrequency thermal ablation tonsillectomy in adults: a pilot study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1106–12
10Leinbach, RF, Markwell, SJ, Colliver, JA, Lin, SY. Hot versus cold tonsillectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:360–4
11Koltai, PJ, Solares, CA, Koempel, JA, Hirose, K, Abelson, TI, Krakovitz, PR et al. Intracapsular tonsillar reduction (partial tonsillectomy): reviving a historical procedure for obstructive sleep. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:532–8
12Wexler, DB. Recovery after tonsillectomy: electrodissection vs sharp dissection techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;114:576–81
13Perkins, J, Dahiya, R. Microdissection needle tonsillectomy and postoperative pain: a pilot study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:1285–8
14Hall, DJ, Littlefield, PD, Birkmire-Peters, DP, Holtel, MR. Radiofrequency ablation versus electrocautery in tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:300–5


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Comparison of radiofrequency and monopolar electrocautery tonsillectomy

  • F Aksoy (a1), O Ozturan (a1), B Veyseller (a1), Y S Yildirim (a1) and H Demirhan (a1)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.