Adams, W. F.School slates and diphtheria. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, F. P.Diphtheria and its causation. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., P. 553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baginski, A.Zur Serumtherapie der Diphtherie in K. und K. Friedich Kinder Krankenhaus. Berl. Med. Woch., 1895, No. 37.Google Scholar

Baginski, A.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 467.Google Scholar

Beck, H.Transmission of diphtheria by non-sufferers. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 1496.Google Scholar

Bekess, A.Ein Fall von Wund-Diphtherie der Conjunctiva. Wien. Med. Woch., 1895, No. 37.Google Scholar

Berry, W.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1805. Vol. II., p. 1101.Google Scholar

Biggs, H.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 467.Google Scholar

Biggs, H.Diagnosis of doubtful cases of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 528.Google Scholar

Biggs, H.Antitoxin, use of, for immunizing. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 528.Google Scholar

Brown, J. W. H.Case of diphtheria treated by antitoxin. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II P. 779Google Scholar

Brown, L.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 466.Google Scholar

Brown, L.Diphtheria antitoxin serum in London. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckell, L.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 28.Google Scholar

Collinson, J.Antitoxin and diphtheria statistics. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 438.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. W. A.The diphtheria bacillus on healthy surfaces. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Courley, Non-pathogenic streptococci and staphylococci in the throats of children. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 374.Google Scholar

Crouch, H. C.The detection of the diphtheria bacillus by its peculiar action towards certain stains. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII., p. 430.Google Scholar

Dennant, J.Talc shield protector in diphtheria cases. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 449.Google Scholar

Dixey, . The statistics of diphtheria in London. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 488.Google Scholar

Dixey, F. A.Vital statistics of diphtheria in London, 1891–5. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 531.Google Scholar

Dowding, A. W. W.A shield protector for diphtheria. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emyrs-Jones, A.Diphtherial conjunctivitis and antitoxin. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1419.Google Scholar

Bev, Engee. Die in Kairo mit der Serumtherapie bei Diphtheritis elzielten Resultate. Berl. Klin. Woch., Nos. 37 to 41.Google Scholar

Evans, K. D.Diphtheria and schools. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 508.Google Scholar

Ewing, J.The leucocytosis of diphtheria under the influence of serum therapy. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII. pp. 161, 196.Google Scholar

Fischer, L.A plea for the more extensive use of antitoxin in diphtheria. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII., pp. 679, 710.Google Scholar

Fitz-Gerald, R.Diphtheria in the puerperium. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 77.Google Scholar

Fitz-Gerald, C. E.The diphtheria bacillus on healthy surfaces. Lancet, 1895, vol. II., p. 1003.Google Scholar

Flesch, M.Ein Fall von Haut Diphtheric. Berl. Klin. Woch., No. 43. Sammelforschung betreffend der bis zum Schluss des Jahres 1894 mit Diphthericheilserum behandelten Krankheitsfalle. Berl. Med. Woch., No. 43. Die Statistikder Heilserumfrage. Wien. Med. Woeh., 1895, No. 50.Google Scholar

Hall, J. C.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 467.Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. M.See Emyrs-Jones.Google Scholar

Hollis, W. A.Diphtheria antitoxin as culture medium for diphtheria macillus. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., pp. 1194, 1390.Google Scholar

Holmes, W. A.A case of diphtheria treated with antitoxin. Lancet, 1895. Vol. II., p. 1427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, A.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med, Journ. 1895, Vol. II., p. 465.Google Scholar

Kirk, J.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ. 1895. vol. II., p. 1101.Google Scholar

Klein, . The diagnostic value of the diphtheria bacillu. Lancet, 1895. Vol. II., p. 363.Google Scholar

Klein, E.Diagnosis of doubtful case of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ. 1895 Vol. II., pp. 526–8Google Scholar

Klein, . Diphtheria bacillus. Med. Press and Circ, 1895. Vol. LX. PP. 177, 387.Google Scholar

Konig, H.Zur Diagnose and Behandlung der Diphtherie and der Scharlach diphtheric. Wien. Med. Woch., 1895, No. 40.Google Scholar

Luson, T.Antitoxin in diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ. 1895, Vol. II., p. 197Google Scholar

Martin, B. R.Diphtheria—Discussion on. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895. Vol. II pp. 561, 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, B. K.Local treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895. Vol. II., p. 1423.Google Scholar

Martin, S.Diphtheria and its treatment by antitoxin. Lancet, 1895 Vol. II pp. 287, 355.Google Scholar

Martin, S.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895. Vol. II, p. 461.Google Scholar

Martin, S.Diphtheria—Discussion on. Brit. Med. Journ., 1805, Vol. II. p. 683.Google Scholar

Masson, J.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895. Vol. II., p. 27.Google Scholar

Muller, K.Die Serumbehandlung der Diphtheric. Berl. Klin. Woch., 1895. No. 37Google Scholar

Neudörfer, I.Neue Geskhtspunkte zur Pathogenese and Therapie der Diptherie. Wien. Med. Woch., 1895, No. 28.Google Scholar

Peters, E.. Varieties of diphtheria bacilli. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., P. 1557.Google Scholar

Purdy, J. R.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895. Vol. II., p. 28.Google Scholar

Ranke, . Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 465.Google Scholar

Robertson, W.Immunization of horses for preparation of diphtheria antitoxin. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodger, J. H.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 26.Google Scholar

Semple, D.Antitoxin as a culture medium for diphtheria bacillus. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II P. 907.Google Scholar

Sharp, G.Injection of antitoxin by the rectum. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895 Vol. II., pp. 670, 681.Google Scholar

Shuttleworth, E. B.Laboratory notes on the bacteriology of diphtheria. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sriznow, G.Ueber die Behandlung der Diphtheric mit kunstlich dargestellen Antitoxinen. Berl. Klin. Woch., 1895, Nos. 30, 31.Google Scholar

Underhill, E.Diagnosis of doubtful cases of diphtheria. Brit. Mel. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 528.Google Scholar

Walker, J.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895. Vol. II., p. 27.Google Scholar

Walsh, D.What is antitoxin rash? Med. Press and Circ, 1895, Vol. LX., p. 316.Google Scholar

Webber, H. W.Antitoxin treatment of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ. 1895. Vol. II., p. 27.Google Scholar

Webber, H. W.Antitoxin as culture medium for diphtheria bacillus. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, W.Cats and diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II. p. 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, A. E.Antitoxin as culture medium for bacillus diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, PP. 907, 1325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wright, J. C.Epidemic of diphtheria. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II p. 1616.Google Scholar

Young, T. B.Diphtheria in London. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R. H.A case of persistent hiecough and sneezing. Lancet, 1895 Vol. II., p. 1019.Google Scholar

Armstrong, N. L.A new syringe for treating epistaxis. New Vork Mod. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 634.Google Scholar

Barr, . Treatment of adenoid vegetations of the naso-pharynx. Lancet, 1895 Vol. II., p. 657.Google Scholar

Batten, R.Association of myopia with disease of the nose and pharynx. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 96.Google Scholar

Bosworth, F. A.Mucous polypi of the nose. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895 Vol. II., p. 480.Google Scholar

Bosworth, F. H.A case of melancholia dependent on ethmoid disease and cured by intra-nasal operation. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 449.Google Scholar

Bosworth, F. H.A case of suppurative ethmoidal disease. New York Mel. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 450.Google Scholar

Bosworth, F. H.The relation ofaso-motor disturbance of the upper air tract. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 655.Google Scholar

Bowlby, A.Fibro - angioma of the naso-pharynx treated by operation. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II P. 913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, S.Temporary resection of upper jaw for naso-pharyngeal growth. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1235.Google Scholar

Bronner, A.Some common forms of reflexes of nasal origin. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, W. H.Fracture of ethmoid, with basal meningitis. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 1506.Google Scholar

Bryan, J. H.The study of suppurative disease of the accessory sinuses. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, pp. 450, 470.Google Scholar

Campbell, H.Chronic nasal obstruction. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casselberry, W. E.Electrolysis by a current controller for the reduction of spurs of the nasal septum. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII p. 266.Google Scholar

Clemow, A. H. W.The diagnosis of tonsillitis. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, M. P. M.Chronic nasal obstruction. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., pp. 1170, 1189.Google Scholar

Collier, M. P. M.Chronic nasal obstruction. Med. Press and Circ., 1895, Vol. LX., p. 515.Google Scholar

Collier, M. P. M.Trigeminal neuralgia due to nasal disease. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II p. 91, 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

SirDalby, W. B.Adenoid growths in the pharynx. Lancet 1895, Vol. II, p. 1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daly, W. H.Mucous polypi of the nose. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 480.Google Scholar

De Roaldes, A. W.Mucous polypi of the nose. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 481.Google Scholar

Guye, Mucous polypi of the nose. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., P. 474Google Scholar

Hajek, M.Ein Fall von Empyem der Kielbeinhohle mit hedrnhlichen Stauungserscheinungen. Wien. Med. Woch., 1895. Nos 32, 33Google Scholar

Hili, W.Mucous polypi of the nose. Brit. Med. Journ 1895, Vol. II., p. 480.Google Scholar

Hodgkinson, A.Mucous polypi of the nose. Brit. Med Journ., 1805, Vol. II., p. 479Google Scholar

Hooker, J. S.Chloride of ammonium pipe inhalers. Brit. Med. Journ. 1895, Vol. II., p. 844.Google Scholar

Juler, H. E.Carcinoma of body of sphenoid. Brit Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 957.Google Scholar

Koll, Th.Die Anwendung des Nasophens in der rhinologischen and otolugischen Praxis. Berl. Klin. Woch., 1895. No. 29.Google Scholar

Kyle, D. B.Fibrinoplastic exudates, with reports of two cases of laminated Fibrinoplastic rhinitis. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 5.Google Scholar

Lake, R.MUCOUS polypi of the nose. Brit. Med. Journ. 1895, Vol. II., p. 480.Google Scholar

Luc, Mucous polypi of the nose. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 474Google Scholar

Mackenzie, J. N.Mucous polypi of the nose. Brit. Med. Journ. 1895 Vo1. II., p. 480.Google Scholar

Mayer, E.Deviation of the cartilaginous nasal septum. New York Med Journ. Vol. LXII, p. 728.Google Scholar

McBride, P.MUCOUS polypi of the nose. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 478.Google Scholar

Meyer, W.Adenoid vegetations. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1513.Google Scholar

Pierce, N. H.Syphilis of the nose. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 673.Google Scholar

Pinder, G.Empyema of the antrum of Highmore. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II p. 979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roche, J.Treatment of hiccough and sneezing. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 1086.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M.Mucous polypi of the nose. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 480.Google Scholar

Sewill, J. S.Removal of tooth from flocr of nose. rit. Med. Journ., 1893, Vol. II., p. 693.Google Scholar

Spicer, S.Mucous polypi of the nose. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 480.Google Scholar

Stewart, M.New cure for asthma. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1595Google Scholar

Stoker, G.Method of preventing bleeding in removing naso-pharyngeal tumours. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, S. J.Adenoid growths in the pharynx. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., P. 1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, StC.Micro-organisms in inspired air. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 492.Google Scholar

Tilley, J. H.Cases of parosmia. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thrasher, A. B.Congenital osseous stenosis of the nares. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, pp. 750, 760.Google Scholar

Thramier, A. B.Necrosis of the middle turbinate. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 708.Google Scholar

Veeder, A. T.Air pump and nasal inflator. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 91.Google Scholar

Watson, S.Distortion of the septum nasi successfully treated. Lancet, 1895 Vol. II., p. 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, S.Nasal polypi and tacycardia. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II p. 1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, P. W.Mucous polypi in the nose. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., 481.Google Scholar

Wixckler, E.Ueber chirurgische Behandlung gewisser Nasenstenosen. Wien. Med. Woch., 1895, Nos. 42, 47.Google Scholar

Wright, J.Mycosis of the nose and throat. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 1.Google Scholar

Wright, J.A true papilloma of the nasal septum. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, pp. 747, 770.Google Scholar

Wright, J.Cyst of the naso-pharynx and cyst of oro-pharynx. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 750.Google Scholar

Zuckerkandl, Mucous polypi in the nose. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895 Vol. II., 476.Google Scholar

Allen, H.Foreign bodies in the oesophagus. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 203.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. H.Angioma of pharynx. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II, p. 77Google Scholar

Bacon, G.Sarcoma of the neck involving the tonsil, etc. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 269.Google Scholar

Bligh, W.Foot and mouth disease in a boy. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 1355.Google Scholar

Bors, L.Anew mouth-gag. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 123.Google Scholar

Brown, L.Infectiousness of lacunar tonsillitis. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1022.Google Scholar

Conner, J. T.Cases of pigmentation of the mouth and lips and chronic ptyalism. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II p. 1169.Google Scholar

Farlowe, J. W.Some remarks on removal of the tonsils. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 592.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, B.Infectious nature of lacunar tonsillitis. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., pp. 1018, 1022.Google Scholar

Gleitsmann, Infectiousness of lacunar tonsillitis. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1022.Google Scholar

Hill, W.Infectiousness of lacunar tonsillitis. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1021.Google Scholar

Hodgkinson, A.Infectiousness of lacunar tonsillitis. Brit. Med. Journ., 1893, Vol. II., p. 1021.Google Scholar

Hope, G. B.Is acute amygdalitis in any way dependent on the rheumatic diathesis?. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 210.Google Scholar

Hulen, V. H.Cavernous angioma of the tongue. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 531.Google Scholar

Lanphear, E.Two cases of sarcoma of the tonsil. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, p. 134.Google Scholar

Lawrence, L.Infectiousness of lacunar tonsillitis. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1022.Google Scholar

Lee, R.The diagnosis of tonsillitis. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macintyre, J.Infectiousness of lacunar tonsillitis. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., pp. 1020, 1022.Google Scholar

Montague, J. H.The tonsil guillotine. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 84.Google Scholar

Newcomb, J. E.Ludwig's angina. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII, pp. 652, 661.Google Scholar

Owen, E.Operative treatment of cleft palate. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1360.Google Scholar

Payne, W. H.Superficial affections of the red portion of the lips. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ripault, Un cas d'angine de Ludwig. Ann. de l'Oreille, Sept., 1895.Google Scholar

Rofer, L.Improved tonsil guillotine. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 18.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M.Infectiousness of lacunar tonsillitis. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1O22.Google Scholar

Semon, F.Infectiousness of lacunar tonsillitis. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1021.Google Scholar

Sokolowski, Infectiousness of lacunar tonsillitis. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1022.Google Scholar

Symes, J. O.Bacteriological examination of the throat in some fevers. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terry, J.Sore throat and the state of the tongue in influenza. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, StC.Infectiousness of lacunar tonsillitis. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1022.Google Scholar

Thresh, J.Infectious sore throats. Lancet, 1895, Vol. II., p. 402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turck, F. B.Diseases of the mouth, etc. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII., p. 648.Google Scholar

Veeder, A. T.A modified cold snare amygdalotome. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII., p. 893.Google Scholar

Aronsohn, E.Fremdkörper in den Luftwegen. Berl. Klin. Woch., 1895, No.45.Google Scholar

Bark, Removal of singers'nodes. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1614.Google Scholar

Bonain, Laryngite striduleuse et diphtérie. Rev. Mens. de Laryng., May 1, 1895.Google Scholar

Bond, J. W.Early operation in malignant disease of larynx. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II p. 1O35.Google Scholar

Boyd, A. B.Anæsthetics in throat cases. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brindel, De l'herpès du larynx. Rev. Mens. de Laryng., Mar. 15, 1895.Google Scholar

Brindel, Atrophie testiculaire d'origine rhumatismale. Examen du larynx et de la voix. Journ. de Méd. de Bordeaux, June 16, 1895.Google Scholar

Brodi, Paralysie de la corde vocale consécutive à un anévrisme cervical. Rev. Mens. de Laryng., April, 1895.Google Scholar

Broeckaert, Recherches expérimentales sur le centre cortical du larynx. Rev. de Laryng., Aug. 1, 1895.Google Scholar

Bronner, A.Intra-laryngeal injections. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1024.Google Scholar

Bronner, A.Chorditis tuberosa. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II p. 1O99Google Scholar

Butlin, H. T.Early radical treatment of malignant disease of larynx. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1033.Google Scholar

Cathcart, G. C.Function of laryngeal ventricles and ventricular bands. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1024.Google Scholar

Claremont, C. C.Function of laryngeal ventricles and ventricular bands. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1024.Google Scholar

Coen, R.Ueber Sprachstörungen and deren Behandlung. Wien. Med. Woch., 1896, Nos. 30 and 31.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. S.Case of complete laryngectomy. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895 Vol. II., p. 1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corradi, Considérations sur les sténoses du larynx. Nouvelle méthode de dilatation. Ann. de l'Oreille, Sept., 1895.Google Scholar

Delavan, D. B.Indications for early radical treatment of malignant disease of larynx. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1029.Google Scholar

Delavan, D. B.Chorditis tuberosa. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II. p. 1099.Google Scholar

Delavan, D. B.The influence of chronic diseases of the throat upon certain defects of speech, especially stammering. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII. p. 368.Google Scholar

Desanti, F.Operation of thyrotomy. Brit. Med. Journ., 1895, Vol. II., p. 1025.Google Scholar

Didsbury, . De la paralysie récurrentielle unilatérale considérée au point devue étiologique et pathogénique. Archiv. de Laryng., March and April, 1895.Google Scholar

Douglas, O. B.Modern methods of treating diseases of the nose and throat. New York Med. Journ., Vol. LXII., p. 518.Google Scholar