Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:47:49.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Barotitis in children after aviation; prevalence and treatment with Otovent®

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Sven-Eric Stangerup*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Örjan Tjernström
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology division, Department of Surgery, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, U.A.E
Jonathan Harcourt
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Mads Klokker
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Jens Stokholm
Affiliation:
Medical Service, Scandinavian Airline System, Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Address for correspondence: Sven-Eric Stangerup, ENT Department, Gentofte University Hospital, Niels Andersens vej 65, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark.

Abstract

Barotitis is an acute or chronic inflammation caused by environmental pressure changes. The most common cause is the pressure change during descent in civil aviation. To prevent barotitis the middle ear pressure has to be equalised several times during descent. This can be achieved by performing the Valsalva manoeuvre, but for children, many of whom have a dysfunction of the Eustachian tube, this is difficult to perform and they are therefore at high risk of developing barotitis during flight. The traditional treatment modalities of barotitis are inflation by a Politzer balloon, myringotomy or prophylactic grommet insertion. An alternative treatment or prophylactic measure is autoinflation using the Otovent® treatment set. This prophylaxis/treatment can be performed by the child with assistance from its parents as soon as possible or rather before the descent has started. The prevalence of barotitis amongst transit passengers was found to be highest in young children, 25 per cent, compared with adults, five per cent. Only 21 percent of the youngest children with negative middle ear pressure after flight managed a successful Valsalva's manoeuvre, whereas 82 per cent could increase the middle ear pressure inflating the Otovent® set. In conclusion we recommend autoinflation using the Otovent® set by children and adults with problems clearing the ears during flight.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, H. G., Heim, J. W. (1937) The effect of flight on the middle ear. Journal of the American Medical Association 109: 417421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanshard, J. D., Maw, A. R., Bawden, R. (1993) Conservative treatment of otitis media with effusion by autoinflation of the middle ear. Clinical Otolaryngology 18: 188192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bylander, A., Ivarsson, A., Tjernström, Ö. (1981) Eustachian tube function in normal children and adults. Acta Oto- Laryngologica (Stockholm) 92: 481491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bylander, A., Tjernström, Ö., Ivarsson, A. (1983) Pressure opening and closing functions of the Eustachian tube by inflation and deflation in children and adults with normal ears. Acta Oto-Laryngologica (Stockholm) 96: 255268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiellau-Nikolajsen, M., Lous, M. (1979) Prospective tympanometry in three-year-old children. Archives of Otolaryngology 105: 461466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, H. H. (1989) Aviation aspects of otolaryngology. In Otolaryngology. Vol. 2, Chap. 51. J. B. Lippincott Company, (English, G. M., ed.) pp. 117.Google Scholar
Stangerup, S. E., Sederberg-Olsen, J., Balle, V. (1992) Autoinflation as a treatment of secretory otitis media. A randomized controlled study. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery 118: 149152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teed, R. W. (1944) Factors producing obstruction of the auditory tube in submarine personnel. US Naval Medical Bulletin 42: 293306.Google Scholar