Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:25:15.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of anteroposterior-to-transverse ratio in predicting thyroid malignancy on ultrasonography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2022

Q Guo
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hebei Yanda Hospital, Langfang, China
J Li
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Taiyuan, China
J Xin
Affiliation:
Department of Thyroid Surgery, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Surgical Translational Medicine, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
X Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
*
Author for correspondence: Prof Xiaohong Chen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China E-mail: trchxh@163.com Fax: +86 010 5826 9258

Abstract

Objective

To explore the diagnostic value of anteroposterior-to-transverse ratio for predicting thyroid cancer.

Methods

A total of 2306 nodules were divided into 5 groups according to their size. The ability of the anteroposterior-to-transverse ratio to predict thyroid cancer was analysed in each group on the basis of the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and Youden index.

Results

The median anteroposterior-to-transverse ratio was 0.83, with an interquartile range of 0.28. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.709 (p < 0.001). When the diameter of a thyroid nodule was less than 1.5 cm, an anteroposterior-to-transverse ratio of more than 0.9 was associated with higher sensitivity, accuracy and Youden index, compared with an anteroposterior-to-transverse ratio of greater than 1.0, but the specificity was lower. When the diameter of a thyroid nodule was 1.5 cm or more, an anteroposterior-to-transverse ratio of greater than 0.9 was associated with higher sensitivity and Youden index, compared with an anteroposterior-to-transverse ratio of greater than 1.0, but specificity and accuracy were lower.

Conclusion

The anteroposterior-to-transverse ratio was a meaningful indicator of thyroid cancer, and its predictive effectiveness could be influenced by nodule size.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Prof X Chen takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Haugen, BR, Alexander, EK, Bible, KC, Doherty, GM, Mandel, SJ, Nikiforov, YE et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016;26:1133CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tessler, FN, Middleton, WD, Grant, EG, Hoang, JK, Berland, LL, Teefey, SA et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14:587–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, EK, Park, CS, Chung, WY, Oh, KK, Kim, DI, Lee, JT et al. New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:687–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perros, P, Boelaert, K, Colley, S, Evans, C, Evans, RM, Gerrard Ba, G et al. Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2014;81(suppl 1):1122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, SJ, Yoon, DY, Chang, SK, Seo, YL, Yun, EJ, Choi, CS et al. “Taller-than-wide sign” of thyroid malignancy: comparison between ultrasound and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:W420–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richman, DM, Benson, CB, Doubilet, PM, Peters, HE, Huang, SA, Asch, E et al. Thyroid nodules in pediatric patients: sonographic characteristics and likelihood of cancer. Radiology 2018;288:591–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moon, WJ, Jung, SL, Lee, JH, Na, DG, Baek, JH, Lee, YH et al. Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation--multicenter retrospective study. Radiology 2008;247:762–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moon, HJ, Kwak, JY, Kim, EK, Kim, MJ. A taller-than-wide shape in thyroid nodules in transverse and longitudinal ultrasonographic planes and the prediction of malignancy. Thyroid 2011;21:1249–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seo, H, Na, DG, Kim, JH, Kim, KW, Yoon, JW. Ultrasound-based risk stratification for malignancy in thyroid nodules: a four-tier categorization system. Eur Radiol 2015;25:2153–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiang, P, Chu, X, Chen, G, Liu, B, Ding, W, Zeng, Z et al. Nodules with nonspecific ultrasound pattern according to the 2015 American Thyroid Association malignancy risk stratification system: a comparison to the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS-Na). Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e17657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Na, DG, Baek, JH, Sung, JY, Kim, JH, Kim, JK, Choi, YJ et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system risk stratification of thyroid nodules: categorization based on solidity and echogenicity. Thyroid 2016;26:562–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, SP, Hu, YP, Chen, B. Taller-than-wide sign for predicting thyroid microcarcinoma: comparison and combination of two ultrasonographic planes. Ultrasound Med Biol 2014;40:2004–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed