Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:27:26.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Braided homology of quantum groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2008

Tom Hadfield  and
Ulrich Krähmer
Tom Hadfield
Affiliation:
Thomas.Daniel.Hadfield@gmail.comRoyal Bank of Scotland250 BishopsgateLondon EC2M 4AAUnited Kingdom
Ulrich Krähmer
Affiliation:
ukraehmer@maths.gla.ac.ukUniversity of GlasgowDepartment of MathematicsUniversity GardensG12 8QW Glasgow, UK
Get access

Abstract

We study braided Hochschild and cyclic homology of ribbon algebras in braided monoidal categories, as introduced by Baez and by Akrami and Majid. We compute this invariant for several examples coming from quantum groups and braided groups.

Keywords

Hochschild homologycyclic homologybraided homologyquantum groups
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of K-Theory , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , October 2009 , pp. 299 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © ISOPP 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Akrami, S. E., Majid, S.: Braided cyclic cocycles and non-associative geometry. J. Math. Phys. 45 (10) (2004), 3883–3911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Baez, J.: Hochschild homology in a braided tensor category. Trans. AMS, 344 (2) (1994), 885–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Beggs, E., Majid, S.: Semiclassical differential structures. Pacific J. Math. 224 (1) (2006), 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Brown, K. A., Zhang, J. J.: Dualising complexes and twisted Hochschild (co)homology for Noetherian Hopf algebras. To appear in J. Algebra, arXiv:math.RA/0603732 (2006)Google Scholar
5.Cartan, H., Eilenberg, S.: Homological algebra, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1956Google Scholar
6.Chari, S., Pressley, A.: A guide to quantum groups, Cambridge University Press, 1996Google Scholar
7.Connes, A.: Cohomologie cyclique et foncteurs Extn. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I 296 (23) (1983), 953–958Google Scholar
8.Connes, A.: Noncommutative differential geometry. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 62 (1985), 257–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Dijkgraaf, R., Pasquier, V., Roche, P.: Quasi Hopf algebras, group cohomology, and orbifold models. Nuclear Phys. B 18B (1990), 60–72Google Scholar
10.Doi, Y., Takeuchi, T.: Multiplication alteration by two-cocycles. Comm. Algebra 22 (14) (1994), 5715–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Drinfeld, V. G.: On almost cocommutative Hopf algebras. (Russian) Algebra i Analiz 1 (2) (1989), 30–46Google Scholar
Drinfeld, V. G.: On almost cocommutative Hopf algebras. translation in Leningrad Math. J. 1 (2) (1990), 321–342Google Scholar
12.Feng, P., Tsygan, B.: Hochschild and cyclic homology of quantum groups. Comm. Math. Phys. 140 (3) (1991), 481–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Getzler, E., Jones, J.D.S.: The cyclic homology of crossed product algebras, J. Reine Angew. Math. 445 (1993), 161–174Google Scholar
14.Hadfield, T.: Twisted cyclic homology of all Podleś quantum spheres. J. Geom. Phys. 57 (2) (2007), 339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Hadfield, T., Krähmer, U.: Twisted homology of quantum SL(2). K-Theory 34 (4) (2005), 327–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hadfield, T., Krähmer, U.: On the Hochschild homology of quantum SL(N). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 343 (2006), 9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Hayashi, T.: Coribbon Hopf (Face) algebras generated by lattice models. J. Algebra 233 (2000), 614–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hodges, T. J.: Double quantum groups and Iwasawa decomposition, J. Algebra 192 (1) (1997), 303-325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Kassel, C.: Quantum groups, Springer-Verlag, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Klimyk, A., Schmüdgen, K.: Quantum groups and their representations. Springer, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Korogodski, L., Soibelman, Y. S.: Algebras of functions on quantum groups : part I. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 56, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1998Google Scholar
22.Kustermans, J., Murphy, G. J., Tuset, L.: Differential calculi over quantum groups and twisted cyclic cocycles. J. Geom. Phys. 44 (4) (2003), 570–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Loday, J. L.: Cyclic homology. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften 301, Springer-Verlag, 1998Google Scholar
24.Majid, S.: Foundations of Quantum Group Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2000Google Scholar
25.Neshveyev, S., Tuset, L.: Notes on the Kazhdan-Lusztig theorem on equivalence of the Drinfeld category and the category of Uq()-modules, arXiv:0711.4302Google Scholar
26.Runkel, I., Fjelstad, J., Fuchs, J., Schweigert, C.: Topological and conformal field theory as Frobenius algebras, Contemp. Math. 431 (2007), 225–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Sitarz, A.: Twisted Hochschild homology of quantum hyperplanes. K-Theory 35 (1-2) (2005), 187-198CrossRefGoogle Scholar