Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:16:53.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quest for Integrity: The Mexican-US Drug Issue in the 1980s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Peter Reuter
Affiliation:
Washington office of the RAND Corporation and Drug Policy Research Center
David Ronfeldt
Affiliation:
International Policy Department of the Rand Corporation

Extract

The Flow of drugs from Mexico to the United States has been a source of trouble in US-Mexican relations for at least two decades. The dominant view in Mexico is that the problem arises from the inability of the United States to control its domestic demand for heroin, cocaine, and marijuana. The dominant US view has been that the Mexican government has failed to make effective efforts to control the supply of drugs. At times — in particular after the killing of Enrique Camarena, an agent of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), in 1985 — US government anger at Mexico's alleged failure to maintain the integrity of its anti-drug efforts has been the dominant source of friction between the two nations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguayo, S. (1990) “Los usos, abusos, y retos de la seguridad nacional Mexicana: 1946-1990,” pp. 107145 in Aguayo, Sergio and Bagley, Bruce (eds.) En busca de la seguridad perdida: aproximaciones a la seguridad nacional mexicana. México (DF), México: Siglo Veintuno Editores.Google Scholar
Aguayo, S. (1988) “México in Transition and the United States: Old Perceptions, New Problems,” pp. in Roett, Riordan (ed.) México and the United States: Managing the Relationship. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Americas Watch (1990) Human Rights in México: A Policy of Impunity. New York, NY: Americas Watch.Google Scholar
Aravelo Gardoqui, J. (1987) National Defense Secretary's Conference About the Permanent Campaign against Drug Trafficking, Oaxaca, México (August).Google Scholar
Brinkley, J. (1986) “México and the Narcotics Traffic: Growing Strain in US Relations.” New York Times (20 October): 1, 4.Google Scholar
Cardenas, C. (1990) “México bajo el escrutinio intemacional.” La Opinion (Los Angeles) (20 July):Google Scholar
Carrillo Olea, J. (1990) “Contra el narco: coordinacion intemacional y con los estados.” El National (Special Supplement) (27 October): 14.Google Scholar
Craig, R. (1989) “US Narcotics Policy Toward México: Consequences for the Bilateral Relationship,” in Gonzalez, Guadalupe and Tienda, Marta (eds.) The Drug Connection in US_Mexican Relations: Dimensions of US-Mexican Relations (Vol. 4). Papers prepared for the Bilateral Commission on the Future of United States-Mexican Relations. La Jolla, CA: Center for US-Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego. Google Scholar
Craig, R.(1985) “Illicit Drug Traffic and US-Latin American Relations.” The Washington Quarterly (Fall): 105124.Google Scholar
Craig, R. (1980) “Operation Condor: México's Antidrug Campaign Enters a New Era.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 22, 3 (August): 345363.Google Scholar
Craig, R. (1978) “La campana permanente: México's Antidrug Campaign.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 20, 2 (May): 107131.Google Scholar
Del Villar, S. (1989) “Controlling the US Mexican Drug Market,” in Gonzalez, Guadalupe and Tienda, Marta (eds.) The Drug Connection in US-Mexican Relations: Dimensions of US-Mexican Relations (Vol. 4). Papers presented for the Bilateral Commission on the Future of United States-Mexican Relations. La Jolla, CA: Center for US-Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Del Villar, S (1988a) “Rethinking Hemispheric Antinarcotics Strategy and Security” (May). México (DF), México: El Colegio de México, unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Del Villar, S (1988b) “The Illicit US-México Drug Market: Failure and Policy and an Alternative,” pp. in Roett, Riordan (ed.) México and the United States: Managing the Relationship. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Dziedzic, M. (1989) “The Transnational Drug Trade and Regional Security.” Survival (November/December): 533-548.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. (1978) Agency of Fear. New York, NY: G.P. Putnam's.Google Scholar
García Ramirez, S. (1988) El narcotráfico: un punto de vista mexicano. México (DF), México: Editorial Porrua.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, G. (1985) “El problema del nacotrafico en el contexto de la relation entre México y Estados Unidos.” Carta de Política Exterior Mexicana [Centro de Investigation y Docencia Economicas] (April-September): 2028.Google Scholar
Mark, Kleiman (1989) Marijuana: Costs of Abuse, Costs of Control. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lee, R. (1989) White Labyrinth. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
Lupsha, P. (1981) “Drug Trafficking: México and Colombia in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of International Affairs (Spring/Summer): 95115.Google Scholar
Lupsha, P. and Schlegel, K. (1980) “The Polítical Economy of Drug Trafficking: The Herrera Organization; México and United States” (Working Paper #2, November). Albuquerque, NM: Latin American Institute, The University of New México.Google Scholar
Lynch, C. and Simon, J. (1990) “Polítical Outlaw in Michoacan is Stuff of Legends” (draft news article, 27 July).Google Scholar
Mastretta, S. (1990) Tierra caliente: La cuenca cardenista.” Nexos 154 (October): 4764.Google Scholar
México. Office of the Attorney General of the Republic (1990) “México's Efforts in the Fight Against Drug Trafficking” (December). México (DF), México: Procuradoria General de la Republica.Google Scholar
Musto, D. (1971) The American Disease. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
National Institute on Drug Abuse (1989) National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Population Estimates 1988. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
National Narcotics Intelligence Consumers Committee (NNICC) (1989) The NNICC Report. Washington, DC: Department of State.Google Scholar
National Narcotics Intelligence Consumers Committee (NNICC) (1988) The NNICC Report. Washington, DC: Department of State.Google Scholar
National Narcotics Intelligence Consumers Committee (NNICC) (1984) The NNICC Report. Washington, DC: Department of State.Google Scholar
(The) New York Times (1990) “México Marijuana Underestimated, US Says.” (26 February): Al6.Google Scholar
Noe Torres, O. (1988) “México y Estados Unidos ante el problema del narcotráfico” (Serie: Estudios del CIEE, EST-016-88). México (DF), México: Centro Interamericano de Estudios Estrategicos, A.C. (CIEE).Google Scholar
Poppa, T. (1990) Drug Lord: The Life and Death of a Mexican Kingpin. New York: NY: Pharos Books.Google Scholar
Ramirez, C. (1990) “El caso Camarena y las relaciones bilaterales.” La Opinion (25 May): 5.Google Scholar
Reuter, P. (1985) “Eternal Hope: America's International Drug Control Efforts.” Trie Public Interest 79 (Spring):Google Scholar
Reuter, P. (1984) “The (Continued) Vitality of Mythical Numbers.” The Public Interest 75 (Spring).Google Scholar
Reuter, P. (1983) “La signification economique des marches illegaux aus Etats-Unis: le cas de marijuana,” in Archambault, E. and Greffe, X. (eds.) Les economies non officielles. Paris, France: Editions Le Decouverte.Google Scholar
Reuter, P., Crawford, G., and Cave, J. (1988) Sealing the Borders: The Effects of Increased Military Involvement in Drug Interdiction (R-3594-USDP). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Ronfeldt, D. and Ortiz de Opperman, M. (1990) Mexican Immigration, US Investment and US-Mexican Relations (JRI-08, August). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Cabanas, M. (1990) “La campafia permanente de México contra el narcotráfico: fundamentos, costos, beneficios e implicaciones políticas.” Paper presented at the Projecto sobre Cooperation Hemisferica para la Prevention del Trafico y el Abuso de Drogas, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla (CA), 19 April.Google Scholar
Salinas de Gortari, C. (1989a) Speech to US-México XIX Interparliamentary Meeting, Zihuatenejo (México), 28 April.Google Scholar
Salinas de Gortari, C. (1989b) “Address to the Joint Session of the Congress of the United States,” Washington (DC), 4 October.Google Scholar
Shannon, E. (1988) Desperadoes: Latin Drug Lords, US Lawmen, and the War America Can't Win. New York, NY: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Sistema Nacional de Enquestas de Salud (1989) Encuesta Nacional de Addiciones. México (DF), México.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1987) México and Narcotics: A Must-Win Situation. Tempe, AZ: Incamex.Google Scholar
Toro, M. (1990a) “El control del narcotráfico: podemos cooperar?” pp. 231252 in Torres, Blanca (ed.) Interdependencia: un enfoque util para el Análisis de las relaciones México-Estados Unidos? México (DF), México: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Toro, M. (1990b) “México y Estados Unidos: el narcotráfico como amenaza a la seguridad nacional,” pp.367387 in Aguayo, Sergio and Bagley, Bruce (eds.) En busca de la seguridad perdida: aproximaciones a la seguridad nacional mexicana. México (DF), México: Siglo Veintuno Editores.Google Scholar
Toro, M. (1989) “The United States and México: Drug-Trafficking from a National Security Perspective.” Paper presented at the XV Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Miami (FL), 4-6 December.Google Scholar
United States. Department of State (US-DS) (1990) International Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Washington, DC: Bureau of International Narcotics Matters (BINM), US Department of State.Google Scholar
United States. Department of State (US-DS) (1989) International Narcotics Control Strategy Report. Washington, DC: Bureau of International Narcotics Matters (BINM), US Department of State.Google Scholar
United States. Drug Enforcement Administration (US-DEA) (1989) Special Report: “From the Source to the Street.” Intelligence Trends 16, 2.Google Scholar
United States. General Accounting Office (US-GAO) (1988a) Border Control: Drug Interdiction and the Related Activities along the Southwestern US Border. Fact Sheet GAO/GGD-88-124FS (September). Washington, DC: GAO.Google Scholar
United States. General Accounting Office (US-GAO) (1988b) Drug Control: US-México Opium, Poppy, and Marijuana Aerial Eradication Program. Washington, DC: GAO.Google Scholar
United States. House of Representatives (US-HR) (1989) “US Narcotics Control Programs in Peru, Bolivia, Colombia and México: An Update.” Report of a Staff Study Mission for the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, February. 101st Congress, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States. House of Representatives (US-HR) (1987) “Narcotics Control in México.” Hearing before the Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control, August. 100th Congress, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States. House of Representatives (US-HR) (1986) “United States-Mexican Cooperation in Narcotics Control Efforts.” Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, July. 99th Congress, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States. House of Representatives (US-HR) (1984) “International Narcotics Control Study Missions to Latin America and Jamaica.” Report of the Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control. 98th Congress, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
United States. Office of National Drug Control Policy (US-ONDCP) [Executive Office of the President] (1989) National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Wager, S. (1989) “The Mexican Military: Changing Roles and New Directions.” Paper presented at the Center of US-Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla (CA), 15 November.Google Scholar
Walker, W. (1988) Drug Control in the Americas (rev. ed.). Albuquerque, NM: University of New México Press.Google Scholar
Walton, J. (1970) “Development Decision-Making: A Comparative Study in Latin America.” American Journal of Sociology (March): 828851.Google Scholar
Werner, D. (1990) “La guerra antidrogas.” Nexos 156 (December): 2733.Google Scholar