Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T14:49:17.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Functional Elites of Quito*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Emily M. Nett*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Evansville, Evansville, Indiana

Extract

When the educated natives of the capital city of Ecuador are questioned about social class and the power structure of their country, the answer comes unhesitatingly and with little variation. Everyone, and of course the educated are as yet few in number, knows who is who and what is what. The sampler of random opinion concludes that the real power is no longer in Quito but in the port of Guayaquil. This has been documented by Díaz, who claims that the traditional aristocracy today owns only about 50 percent of sierran acreage, most of it impoverished and ruined, and that this class is declining steadily with the growth of various coastal “bourgeoisie” classes which stem from the commercial and banking interests of the coast. Politically, too, according to Lang, the coastal influence is undermining that of the sierra, the deposition of the military junta in 1966 being attributable to pressures from the Guayaquil commercial oligarchy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Partial funds for the research reported in this paper were provided by a Faculty Research Grant, Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas, 1967-1968.

References

1 Díaz, A., “Cambios sociales de las clases dominantes del Ecuador,” Revista mexicana de sociología 25 (1963): 721736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Lang, Norris G., “Plutocrats, Managers, and Workers: An Analysis of the Social Organization of a Coastal Ecuadorian Plantation.” (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, 1969)Google Scholar.

3 Blanksten, George I., “Ecuador: The Politics of Instability,” in Political Systems of Latin America, Needier, Martin C., ed. (Princeton, New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., 1964)Google Scholar.

4 Lang, , “Political Instability: The Industrial Elite of Coastal Ecuador” (presented to the Third Annual Conference on Latin America, University of Houston, 1968)Google Scholar.

5 Needier, Martin, Anatomy of a Coup d'Etat: Ecuador 1963 (Washington: Institute for the Comparative Study of Political Systems, 1964)Google Scholar.

6 Ribeiro, Darey, “Universities and Social Development,” in Elites in Latin America, Seymour Lipset and Aldo Solari, eds. (New York: Oxford Press, 1967)Google Scholar.

7 Lenski, Gerhart, “Status Crystallization: A Non-Vertical Dimension of Social Status,” The American Sociological Review 19 (1954): 405413 Google Scholar.

8 Whiteford, Andrew H., Two Cities of Latin America: A Comparative Description, (Beloit, Wisconsin: The Legan Museum of Anthropology, 1960)Google Scholar.

9 Eisenstadt, S. N., Modernization: Protest and Change (Englewood, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1966)Google Scholar.

10 Silvert, Kalman, “Nationalism in Latin America,” in The Dynamics of Change in Latin American Politics, Martz, John D., ed. (Englewood, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1965)Google Scholar.

11 Baltzell, Edward D., “ ‘Who's Who in America’ and “The Social Register': Elite in Upperclass Indexes in Metropolitan America” in Class, Status, and Power, 3rd ed., Bendix, R. and Lipset, S. M., eds. (New York: Free Press, 1966), pp. 266276 Google Scholar.

12 Aron, Raymond, “Social Class, Political Class, Ruling Class,” European Journal of Sociology 1 (1960): 260281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, translated in Bendix and Lipset, eds., Class, Status, and Power.

13 Keller, Suzanne, Beyond the Ruling Class (New York: Random House, 1963)Google Scholar.

14 Gillin, John P., “Some Sign Posts for Policy,” in Social Change in Latin America Today, Adams, Richard N. et al, eds. (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1960)Google Scholar.

15 Caicedo, Reinaldo Torres, Los estratos socioeconómicos del Ecuador (Quito, Ecuador: La Junta de Planificación y Coordinación Económica, 1960)Google Scholar.

16 Blaise, Hans and Rodríguez, Luis, “Students and the Social Order,” manuscript, 1967 (study of institution building by the University of Pittsburg; an AID Project)Google Scholar.

17 Needier, Anatomy of a coup d'Etat.

18 Keller, , Beyond the Ruling Class (New York: Random House, 1963)Google Scholar.