Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T06:33:57.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Congress, International Narcotics Policy, and the Anti–Drug Abuse Act of 1988

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Raphael Francis Perl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Congress of The United States exerts greater influence over foreign policy than do its counterparts in other nations. This influence extends to formulation of US policy regarding control of the international narcotics trade, a subject on which the Congress has chosen to assume a leading role. The formal policymaking role of the Congress in this area is embodied in legislation on international narcotics (including appropriation of funds) and in oversight. The Congress also exercises its influence in an informal way through consultation, unofficial advice, public education, and legislative prodding in the drafting and conduct of that policy.

The congressional role in narcotics policymaking is notably affected by its committee structure, in which numerous committees may exercise some degree of jurisdiction over narcotics-related issues. As a result, not only has there been widespread involvement of the Congress in formulating narcotics policy, but there has also been considerable fragmentation of that policy as congressional initiatives have been compartmentalized within the jurisdictional domains of various committees.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 30 , Issue 2-3: Special Issue: Assessing the Americas' War on Drugs , Summer 1988 , pp. 19 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collier, E. (1988) Required Reports to Congress on Foreign Policy. Prepared for US House Committee on Foreign Affairs by the Congressional Researc, Service: 1 August. Washington, DC Google Scholar
Collier, E. (1986) Foreign Policy Roles of the President and the Congress (Report No. 86-163F). Prepared by Congressional Research Service. Washington, DC: Library of Congress. Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly (1988) “Senate Republicans Offer Anti-Drug Proposal.” (9 July): 1936.Google Scholar
Dewar, H. and Isikoff, M. (1988) “Differing National Anti-Drug Proposals Unveiled.” Washington Post (1 July): A-7.Google Scholar
Dole, R. (1988) Proposal for 1988 Omnibus Anti-Drug Bill, released 6 June, by Senate Republican Drug Task Force (Senator Robert Dole, chairman).Google Scholar
Frank, T. and Weisband, E. (1979) Foreign Policy by Congress. Ne. York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Hardy, C. (1988) “House and Senate Standing Committees and Subcommittees with Jurisdiction over National Drug Abuse Policy” Congressional Researc, Service: 27 September. Washington, DC Google Scholar
Kraar, L. (1988) “The Drug Trade.” Fortune (20 June).Google Scholar
Moynihan, P. and Nunn, S. (1988) co-chaired the Democratic Substance Abuse Working Group, which produced a paper entitled “Epidemic: A Concept Paper by the Democratic Substance Abuse Working Group, ” 29 June.Google Scholar
New York Times (1988) 10 April: 10.Google Scholar
Perl, R. (1988) Drug Control: International Policy and Options (Congressional Research Service Issue Brief No. IB-88093); updated regularly. Washington, DC: Library of Congress. Google Scholar
Perl, R. (prepared by) (198 8.) International Narcotics Control and Foreign Assistance Certification: Requirements, Procedures, Timetables: and Guidelines (March). Prepared for US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. Washington, DC Google Scholar
Perl, R. (ed.) (198 6.) Legislation on Foreign Relations throug, 1985: Vol. I (April). Prepared for the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. Washington, DC Google Scholar
Perl, R. (1986) “Narcopolitica: la ley norteamericana contra el abuso de drogas y la relaciones Estados Unidos-México.” Estados Unidos: Perspectiva Latinoamericana No. 20 (2nd semester 1986). Washington, DC: Library of Congress. Google Scholar
Perl, R. (198 6.) Narcotics Control and the Use of US Military Personnel: Operations in Bolivia and Issues for Congress (a policy alert). Congressional Research Report No, 86-800F: 29 July. Washington, DC Google Scholar
Perl, R. and Surrett, R. (1988) Narcotics Interdiction and Use of the Military: Issues for Congress. Prepared for US Congress Committee on Arme, Services: 24 August. Washington, DC Google Scholar
Rasky, S. (1988) “For its War, Congress is Brimming with Combative Ideas.” New York Times (10 July): E-5.Google Scholar
US Constitution.Google Scholar
US Congress. House (1988a) Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control, 16 March (Scnac 100-2-2) and 29 March (100-2-3), in two printed parts.Google Scholar
US Congress. House (1988b) Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, 8 June (Serial No. 100-70).Google Scholar
US Congress. House (1988c) Committee on Foreign Affairs. Sessions of 27 January, 3 March, 9 March, 10 March, 15 March, 17 March, and 27 March.Google Scholar
US Congress. Senate (1988a) Committee on Governmental Affairs, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 28 January.Google Scholar
US Congress. House (1988b) Committee on Appropriations, Special Hearing, FY 1989 (S-Hrg 100-693).Google Scholar
US Public Laws:Google Scholar
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 (PL 99-570).Google Scholar
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (PL 100-690).Google Scholar
Arms Export Control Act of 1986 (PL 90-629); amended, PL 94-329.Google Scholar
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (PL 87-195); amended in 1975 (PL 94- 161).Google Scholar
Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act for FY 1989, 100th Congress, 2nd session (HR 4637).Google Scholar
International Narcotics Control Act of 1988.Google Scholar
National Narcotics Leadership Act of 1987 (S.789 [Biden/HR2454, Rangel/ Gilman, Rodino]).Google Scholar
Omnibus Drug Initiative Act of 1988 (HR5810). Posse Comitatus Act.Google Scholar
Trade Act of 1974 as amended by SEC. 4407 and 4408 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986.Google Scholar
War Powers Resolution of 1973 (PL 93-148).Google Scholar
US General Accounting Office (US-GAO) (1988) Drug Control: US International Narcotics Control Activities. Report to Congress GAO/NSIAD-88-114, March. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
US Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) (1987) The Border War on Drugs (March). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Womach, J. (1988) Agricultural Imports, What, from Whom, Why, How Much? Congressional Research Service Report No. 88-3 6. , Enr: May. Washington, DC Google Scholar