Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T23:10:29.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in two experimental hosts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

Abstract

Lung infection with Angiostrongylus cantonensis was established in experimentally infected Indian softfurred rats (Millardia meltada) and Indian spiny mice (Mus platythrix). Pulmonary arterial migration occurred earlier (at day 20 after infection) in M. meltada than in Wistar rats. M. meltada and M. platythrix could serve as useful animal models for comparative studies of mechanisms determining host specificity of A. cantonensis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alicata, J.E. & Jindrak, K. (1970) In: Anglostrongylosls in the Pacific and Southeast Asia. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
Bhaibulaya, M. (1975) Comparative studies on the life history of Anglostrongylus mackerrasac Bhaibulaya, 1968 and Anglostrongylus cantonensis (Chen, 1935). International Journal for parasitology, 5, 720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishi, A.I., Kino, H., Hayashi, M., Fujio, Y. & Sano, M. (1980) Experimental light infection of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in hamsters. International Journal of Zoonoses, 7, 120124.Google Scholar
John, D.T. (1974) Acquired immunity to experimental infection with Angiostrongylus cantonensis in mice. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 41, 121126.Google Scholar
Kamiya, M., Oku, Y., Kamiya, H. & Nomura, T. (1982) Characteristic responses of nude mice in angiostrongyliasis and echinococcosis. In: Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Nude Mice, pp. 133145, Gustav Fischer New York, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Lämmler, G. & Weidner, E. (1975) Zur larvizidcn Wirkung von Anthclminthika gegen Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Berliner und Mūnchener tierārtztliche Wochenschrift, 88, 152–56.Google Scholar
Mackerras, M.J. & Sandars, D.F. (1955) The life history of the rat lungworm, Anglostrongylus cantonensis (Chen) (Ncmatoda: Metastrongylidae). Australian Journal of Zoology, 3, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przyjalkovvski, Z. & Gorecka, T. (1976) Angiostrongylus cantonensis Chen, 1935 (Ncmatoda, Metastrongylidae) development in gcrmfrcc and conventional mice. Ada Parasitologlca Polonica, 24, 5767.Google Scholar
Wallace, G.D. & Rosen, L. (1969) Studies on cosinophilic meningitis. VI. Experimental infection of rats and other homoiothcrmic vertebrates with Angiostrongylus cantonensis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 89, 331344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, T., Sato, Y., Shiraki, T., Otsuru, M. & Suzuki, T. (1975) Development of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in rats, mice and guinea pigs. Japanese Journal of Parasitology, 24, 114121.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, K., Aiba, H. & Oya, H.(1979)Transplantation of young adult Angioustrongylus cantoncnsis into the rat pulmonary vessels and its application to the assessment of acquired resistance. International Journal for Parasitology, 9, 97103.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, K. & Kawashima, Y. (1978) Observations on the development of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in mastomys and Mongolian gcrbils. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science, 40, 745748.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, K., Sato, K., Uchida, K. & Oya, H. (1982) The course of Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection in athymic nude and nconatally thymcctomized mice. Zcitschrift fur Parasitenkundc, 67, 217226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshimura, K. & Soulsby, E.J.L. (1976) Anglostrongylus cantonensis: Lymphoid cell responsiveness and antibody production in rats. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 25, 99107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yosida, T.H. (1980) Karyotype of the Indian spiny mouse resulted from tandem fusion of some of the house mouse chromosomes.Cytogla, 45, 753762.Google ScholarPubMed