Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:34:45.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of ecology and phylogeny in determining tapeworm assemblages in skates (Rajiformes)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2018

A. Beer Open the ORCID record for A. Beer [Opens in a new window] ,
T. Ingram Open the ORCID record for T. Ingram [Opens in a new window]  and
H.S. Randhawa Open the ORCID record for H.S. Randhawa [Opens in a new window]
A. Beer*
Affiliation:
Ecology Degree Programme, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
T. Ingram
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
H.S. Randhawa
Affiliation:
Ecology Degree Programme, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
*
Author for correspondence: A. Beer, E-mail: anbeer29@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An understanding of the mechanisms that determine host and parasite relationships is a central aim in parasitology. Association of a parasite species with a host species may be influenced primarily by phylogenetic constraints that cause parasite species to co-speciate with their host species, or predominantly by ecological parameters that influence all other co-evolutionary scenarios. This study aimed to investigate the role of co-speciation as well as other co-evolutionary scenarios in influencing the assemblages of tapeworm parasites (marine cestodes) in skate hosts (Rajiformes) using a modification of the PACo (Procrustean Approach to Cophylogeny) method. The study found that phylogeny and host ecology are both significant predictors of skate–tapeworm relationships, implying that co-speciation as well as other co-evolutionary scenarios are shaping these associations. The study also investigated the key ecological parameters influencing host-switching and found that host diet, distribution depth, average body size and geographical location have a combined effect. Given the importance of parasites in ensuring healthy and stable marine ecosystems, the findings of this study have implications for conservation management worldwide.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 93 , Issue 6 , November 2019 , pp. 738 - 751
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Current address: Otago Museum, 419 Great King St, North Dunedin, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand

†

Current address: Directorate of Natural Resources, Fisheries Department, Falkland Islands Government, Bypass Road, Stanley, Falkland Islands, FIQQ 1ZZ; South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute, Stanley Cottage, Stanley, Falkland Islands, FIQQ 1ZZ; New Brunswick Museum, 277 Douglas Avenue, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada, E2K 1E5

References

Aschliman, NC et al. (2012) Body plan convergence in the evolution of skates and rays (Chondrichthyes: Batoidea). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63, 28–42.Google Scholar
Balbuena, JA, Míguez-Lozano, R and Blasco-Costa, I (2013) PACo: a novel procrustes application to cophylogenetic analysis. PLoS ONE 8, e61048.Google Scholar
Balbuena, JA et al. (2017) Package ‘paco’. Procrustes application to cophylogenetic analysis. R Package 0.3.2. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/paco/paco.pdfGoogle Scholar
Banks, JC and Paterson, AM (2005) Multi-host parasite species in cophylogenetic studies. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 741–746.Google Scholar
Belleggia, M et al. (2014) The diets of four Bathyraja skates (Elasmobranchii, Arhynchobatidae) from the Southwest Atlantic. Cybium 38, 314–318.Google Scholar
Bernot, JP, Caira, JN and Pickering, M (2016) Diversity, phylogenetic relationships and host associations of Calliobothrium and Symcallio (Cestoda:‘Tetraphyllidea’) parasitising triakid sharks. Invertebrate Systematics 30, 616–634.Google Scholar
Bizikov, VA et al. (2004) Identification Guide and Biology of the Falkland Islands Skates. Stanley: Falkland Islands Fisheries Department.Google Scholar
Blomberg, SP, Garland, T Jr and Ives, AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745.Google Scholar
Brooks, DR and Hoberg, EP (2007) How will global climate change affect parasite–host assemblages? Trends in Parasitology 23, 571–574.Google Scholar
Caira, JN and Jensen, K (2001) An investigation of the co-evolutionary relationships between onchobothriid tapeworms and their elasmobranch hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 31, 960–975.Google Scholar
Caira, JN and Jensen, K (2014) A digest of elasmobranch tapeworms. Journal of Parasitology 100, 373–391.Google Scholar
Caira, JN and Reyda, F (2005) Eucestoda (true tapeworms). In K, Rohde (ed.), Marine Parasitology. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 92–104.Google Scholar
Caira, JN et al. (2014) Orders out of chaos–molecular phylogenetics reveals the complexity of shark and stingray tapeworm relationships. International Journal for Parasitology 44, 55–73.Google Scholar
Caira, JN, Jensen, K and Ruhnke, TR (2017) “Tetraphyllidea” van Beneden, 1850 relics. In Caira, JN and Jensen, K (eds), Planetary Biodiversity Inventory (2008–2017): Tapeworms From the Vertebrate Bowels of the Earth. Special Publication No. 25. Lawrence: The University of Kansas Natural History Museum, pp. 371–400.Google Scholar
Casquet, J, Thebaud, C and Gillespie, RG (2012) Chelex without boiling, a rapid and easy technique to obtain stable amplifiable DNA from small amounts of ethanol-stored spiders. Molecular Ecology Resources 12, 136–141.Google Scholar
Cirtwill, AR et al. (2016) Are parasite richness and abundance linked to prey species richness and individual feeding preferences in fish hosts? Parasitology 143, 75–86.Google Scholar
Clark, K et al. (2016) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research 44(Database issue), D67–D72.Google Scholar
Clark, NJ and Clegg, SM (2017) Integrating phylogenetic and ecological distances reveals new insights into parasite host specificity. Molecular Ecology 26, 3074–3086.Google Scholar
Conow, C et al. (2010) Jane: a new tool for the cophylogeny reconstruction problem. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 5, 16.Google Scholar
Dávidová, M et al. (2008) Parasite assemblages of European bitterling (Rhodeus amarus), composition and effects of habitat type and host body size. Parasitology Research 102, 1001–1011.Google Scholar
de Vienne, DM et al. (2013) Cospeciation vs host–shift speciation: methods for testing, evidence from natural associations and relation to coevolution. New Phytologist 198, 347–385.Google Scholar
Dunn, RR et al. (2009) The sixth mass coextinction: are most endangered species parasites and mutualists? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 276, 3037–3045.Google Scholar
Ebert, DA and Bizzarro, JJ (2007) Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of skates (Chondrichthyes: Rajiformes: Rajoidei). Environmental Biology of Fishes 80, 221–237.Google Scholar
Fahrenholz, H (1913) Ectoparasiten und abstammungslehre. Zoologischer Anzeiger 41, 371–374.Google Scholar
Ferretti, F et al. (2013) Long-term change in a meso-predator community in response to prolonged and heterogeneous human impact. Scientific Reports 3, 1057.Google Scholar
Froese, R and Pauly, D (2016) FishBase. http://www.fishbase.org/Google Scholar
Geange, SW et al. (2011) A unified analysis of niche overlap incorporating data of different types. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2, 175–184.Google Scholar
Hafner, MS and Nadler, SA (1990) Cospeciation in host–parasite assemblages: comparative analysis of rates of evolution and timing of cospeciation events. Systematic Zoology 39, 192–204.Google Scholar
Harper, JT and Saunders, GW (2001) The application of sequences of the ribosomal cistron to the systematics and classification of the florideophyte red algae (Florideophyceae, Rhodophyta). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 42, 25–38.Google Scholar
Healy, CJ et al. (2009) Proposal for a new tapeworm order, Rhinebothriidea. International Journal for Parasitology 39, 497–511.Google Scholar
Hudson, PJ, Dobson, AP and Lafferty, KD (2006) Is a healthy ecosystem one that is rich in parasites? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 381–385.Google Scholar
Jorge, F et al. (2018) Getting there and around: host range oscillations during colonization of the Canary Islands by the parasitic nematode Spauligodon. Molecular Ecology 27, 533–549.Google Scholar
Kearse, M et al. (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649.Google Scholar
Lanfear, R et al. (2012) PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29, 1695–1701.Google Scholar
Life Technologies (2011) PureLink Quick Gel Extraction Kit: Quick Reference. https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/purelink_quick_gel_extraction_kit_qrc.pdf.Google Scholar
Mantel, N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27, 209–220.Google Scholar
Mendlová, M et al. (2012) Monogeneans of West African cichlid fish: evolution and cophylogenetic interactions. PLoS ONE 7, e37268.Google Scholar
Míguez-Lozano, R, Rodriguez-Gonzalez, A and Balbuena, JA (2017) A quantitative evaluation of host–parasite coevolutionary events in three genera of monopisthocotylean monogeneans. Vie et Milieu–Life and Environment 67, 103–119.Google Scholar
Naylor, GJ et al. (2012) A DNA sequence-based approach to the identification of shark and ray species and its implications for global elasmobranch diversity and parasitology. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 367, 1–262.Google Scholar
Nylin, S et al. (2017) Embracing colonizations: a new paradigm for species association dynamics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 33, 4–14.Google Scholar
Olson, PD et al. (1999) Evidence for host-specific clades of tetraphyllidean tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Eucestoda) revealed by analysis of 18S ssrDNA. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 1465–1476.Google Scholar
Olson, PD et al. (2010) Evolution of the trypanorhynch tapeworms: parasite phylogeny supports independent lineages of sharks and rays. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 223–242.Google Scholar
Page, RDM (2003) Introduction. In RDM, Page (ed.), Tangled Trees: Phylogeny, Cospeciation, and Coevolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Pagel, M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884.Google Scholar
Palm, HW et al. (2009) Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the Trypanorhyncha (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52, 351–367.Google Scholar
Paradis, E, Claude, J and Strimmer, K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290.Google Scholar
Paterson, AM and Banks, J (2001) Analytical approaches to measuring cospeciation of host and parasites: through a glass, darkly. International Journal for Parasitology 31, 1012–1022.Google Scholar
Paterson, AM, Gray, RD and Wallis, GP (1993) Parasites, petrels and penguins: does louse presence reflect seabird phylogeny? International Journal for Parasitology 23, 515–526.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org/Google Scholar
Randhawa, HS and Poulin, R (2010) Determinants of tapeworm species richness in elasmobranch fishes: untangling environmental and phylogenetic influences. Ecography 33, 866–877.Google Scholar
Randhawa, HS et al. (2008) Redescription of Pseudanthobothrium hanseni Baer, 1956 and description of P. purtoni n. sp. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from different pairs of rajid skate hosts, with comments on the host specificity of the genus in the northwest Atlantic. Systematic Parasitology 70, 41–60.Google Scholar
Reed, DL and Hafner, MS (1997) Host specificity of chewing lice on pocket gophers: a potential mechanism for cospeciation. Journal of Mammalogy 78, 655–660.Google Scholar
Revell, LJ (2012) phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3, 217–223.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61, 539–542.Google Scholar
Rózsa, L, Tryjanowski, P and Vas, Z (2015) Under the changing climate: how shifting geographic distributions and sexual selection shape parasite diversification. In Morand, S, Krasnov, B and Littlewood, T (eds), Parasite Diversity and Diversification: Evolutionary Ecology Meets Phylogenetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 58–76.Google Scholar
Sguotti, C et al. (2016) Distribution of skates and sharks in the North Sea: 112 years of change. Global Change Biology 22, 2729–2743.Google Scholar
Šimková, A et al. (2004) Molecular phylogeny of congeneric monogenean parasites (Dactylogyrus): a case of intrahost speciation. Evolution 58, 1001–1018.Google Scholar
Spies, IB et al. (2011) Molecular systematics of the skate subgenus Arctoraja (Bathyraja: Rajidae) and support for an undescribed species, the leopard skate, with comments on the phylogenetics of Bathyraja. Ichthyological Research 58, 77–83.Google Scholar
Stamatakis, A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688–2690.Google Scholar
Strona, G (2015) Past, present and future of host–parasite co-extinctions. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 4, 431–441.Google Scholar
White, WT, Last, PR and Séret, B (2016) Human interactions. In Last, PR et al. (eds), Rays of the World. Clayton South: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 16–20.Google Scholar
Wood, CL et al. (2013) Marine protected areas facilitate parasite populations among four fished host species of central Chile. Journal of Animal Ecology 82, 1276–1287.Google Scholar
Worm, B et al. (2006) Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314, 787–790.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Beer et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S2

Download Beer et al. supplementary material(File)
File 777.5 KB