Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T20:51:39.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence and molecular identification of Trichinella species isolated from wildlife originating from Limpopo and Mpumalanga provinces of South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

S. Mukaratirwa*
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban 4000, South Africa
L.J. La Grange
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban 4000, South Africa Mpumalanga, Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Land and Environmental Affairs, South Africa
M.P. Malatji
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban 4000, South Africa
B. Reininghaus
Affiliation:
Mpumalanga, Department of Agriculture, Rural Development, Land and Environmental Affairs, South Africa
J. Lamb
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban 4000, South Africa
*
Author for correspondence: S. Mukaratirwa, E-mail: mukaratirwa@ukzn.ac.za

Abstract

Trichinella species are widely distributed on all continents with the exception of Antarctica, although the full spectrum of Trichinella species found in sub-Saharan African countries, and their hosts, has not been fully documented. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of Trichinella in wildlife from the Greater Kruger National Park (GKNP) and adjacent areas located in the Limpopo and Mpumalanga provinces of South Africa, and to identify the species and/or genotypes of Trichinella larvae isolated from muscle tissues, using molecular techniques. A review of Trichinella spp. and their wildlife hosts reported during 1964–2011 was also conducted and the results were compared with our current study. Ninety samples representing 15 mammalian, two bird and three reptile species were screened for Trichinella infection during 2012–2016, using artificial digestion. Isolates detected were identified using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the internal transcriber spacers ITS1 and ITS2, and expansion segment V (ESV) regions of ribosomal DNA, followed by molecular analysis of the sequences. Twenty samples from seven wildlife species were positive for Trichinella spp. larvae, with an overall prevalence of 21.1% (20/90). The prevalence was higher in carnivores (18.9%, 18/90) than in omnivores (2.2%, 2/90). Analysis of sequences showed that eight of the isolates – two from spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta) (2/8), three from lion (Panthera leo) (3/13), one from leopard (Panthera pardus) (1/6), one from small spotted genet (Genetta genetta) (1/2) and one Nile monitor lizard (Varanus niloticus) (1/2) – conformed to Trichinella zimbabwensis. One isolate from a hyaena was grouped under the encapsulated species clade comprising T. nelsoni and genotype Trichinella T8 reported to be present in South Africa. This is the first report confirming natural infection by T. zimbabwensis in hyaena, leopard, genet and Nile monitor lizard, adding to the body of knowledge on the epidemiology of Trichinella infections in the Greater Kruger National Park of South Africa. Ten Trichinella-like larval isolates recovered after digestion from four wildlife species in this study (2012–2016) revealed inconclusive results due to DNA degradation resulting from poor storage or too few larvae for analysis, in comparison to 20 unidentified isolates from five wildlife species during the 1964–2011 period.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, RJ and Bradley, RD (2006) Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy 87, 643662.Google Scholar
Blaga, R, Gherman, C, Cozma, V, Zocevic, A, Pozio, E and Boireau, P (2009) Trichinella species circulating among wild and domestic animals in Romania. Veterinary Parasitology 159, 218221.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J (1983) Species concept and speciation analysis. Current Ornithology 1, 159187.Google Scholar
Dupouy-Camet, J (2000) Trichinellosis: a worldwide zoonosis. Veterinary Parasitology 93, 191200.Google Scholar
Fu, BQ, Liu, MY, Yao, CY, Li, WH, Li, YG, Wanga, YH, Wub, XP, Zhang, DL, Cai, XP, Blaga, R and Boireau, P (2009) Species identification of Trichinella isolates from China. Veterinary Parasitology 159, 214217.Google Scholar
Gajadhar, AA, Pozio, E, Gamble, HR, Nöckler, K, Maddox-Hyttel, C, Forbes, LB, Vallee, I, Rossi, P, Marinculic, A and Boireau, P (2009) Trichinella diagnostics and control: mandatory and best practices for ensuring food safety. Veterinary Parasitology 159, 197205.Google Scholar
Gottstein, B, Pozio, E and Nöckler, K (2009) Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clinical Microbiology Review 22, 127145.Google Scholar
Hayward, MW, Henschel, P, O'Brien, J, Hofmeyr, M, Balme, G and Kerley, GIH (2006) Prey preferences of the leopard (Panthera pardus). Journal of Zoology 270, 298313.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, JP and Ronquist, F (2001) MrBayes: a Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17, 754755.Google Scholar
Krivokapich, SJ, Pozio, E, Gatti, GM, Gonzales Prous, CL, Ribicich, M, Marucci, G, La Rosa, C and Confalonieri, V (2012) Trichinella patagoniensis n. sp. (Nematoda), a new encapsulated species infecting carnivorous mammals in South America. International Journal for Parasitology 42, 903910.Google Scholar
La Grange, LJ, Marucci, G and Pozio, E (2009) Trichinella zimbabwensis in wild Nile crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus) of South Africa. Veterinary Parasitology 161, 8891.Google Scholar
La Grange, LJ, Marucci, G and Pozio, E (2010) Trichinella zimbabwensis in a naturally infected mammal. Journal of Helminthology 84, 3538.Google Scholar
La Grange, LJ, Govender, D and Mukaratirwa, S (2013) The occurrence of Trichinella zimbabwensis in naturally infected wild crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus) from the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Journal of Helminthology 87, 9196.Google Scholar
La Grange, LJ, Reininghaus, B and Mukaratirwa, S (2014) First report of a mixed infection of Trichinella nelsoni and Trichinella T8 in a leopard (Panthera pardus) from the Greater Kruger National Park, South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 81, 810.Google Scholar
Lariviere, S and Calzada, J (2001) Mammalian species, Genetta genetta. American Society of Mammalogists 680, 16.Google Scholar
La Rosa, G and Pozio, E (2000) Molecular investigation of African isolates for Trichinella reveals genetic polymorphism in Trichinella nelson. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 663667.Google Scholar
Marucci, G, La Grange, LJ, La Rosa, G and Pozio, E (2009) Trichinella nelsoni and Trichinella T8 mixed infection in a lion (Panthera leo) of the Kruger National Park (South Africa). Veterinary Parasitology 159, 225228.Google Scholar
Mukaratirwa, S and Foggin, CM (1999) Infectivity of Trichinella sp. isolated from Crocodylus niloticus to the indigenous Zimbabwean pig (Mukota). International Journal for Parasitology 29, 11291131.Google Scholar
Mukaratirwa, S, Dzoma, BM, Matenga, E, Ruziwa, SD, Sacchi, L and Pozio, E (2008) Experimental infections of baboons (Papio spp.) and vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) with Trichinella zimbabwensis and successful treatment with ivermectin. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 188, 181188.Google Scholar
Mukaratirwa, S, La Grange, L and Pfukenyi, DM (2013) Trichinella infections in animals and humans in sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Acta Tropica 125, 8289.Google Scholar
Nöckler, K and Kapel, CMO (2007) Detection and surveillance for Trichinella: meat inspection hygiene, and legislation. pp. 6997 in Dupouy-Camet, J and Murrell, KD (Eds) FAO/WHO/OIE guidelines for the surveillance, management, prevention and control of trichinellosis. Paris, World Organisation for Animal Health Press.Google Scholar
Pozio, E (2007) World distribution of Trichinella spp. infections in animals and humans. Veterinary Parasitology 149, 321.Google Scholar
Pozio, E and Murrell, KD (2006) Systematics and epidemiology of Trichinella. Advances in Parasitology 63, 371445.Google Scholar
Pozio, E and Zarlenga, DS (2013) Recent advances on the taxonomy, systematics and epidemiology of Trichinella. International Journal for Parasitology 35, 11911204.Google Scholar
Pozio, E, Foggin, CM, Maruccia, G, La Rosa, G, Sacchi, L, Corona, S, Rossi, P and Mukaratirwa, S (2002) Trichinella zimbabwensis n. sp. (Nematoda), a new non-encapsulated species from crocodiles (Crocodylus niloticus) in Zimbabwe also infecting mammals. International Journal for Parasitology 32, 17871799.Google Scholar
Pozio, E, Marucci, G and Casulli, A (2004) Trichinella papuae and Trichinella zimbabwensis induce infection in experimentally infected varans, caimans, pythons and turtles. Parasitology 128, 333342.Google Scholar
Pozio, E, Hoberg, E, La Rosa, G and Zarlenga, DS (2009) Molecular taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of nematodes belonging to the Trichinella genus. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 9, 606616.Google Scholar
Swofford, DL (2002) Paup*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland, Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Tamura, K, Stecher, G, Peterson, D, Filipski, A and Kumar, S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 27252729.Google Scholar
Young, E and Kruger, SP (1967) Trichinella spiralis (Owen, 1935) Railliet 1895, infestation of wild carnivores and rodents in South Africa. Journal of the South Africa Veterinary Association 38, 441443.Google Scholar
Young, E and Whyte, IJ (1975) Trichinosis (Trichinella spiralis infestations) in wild animals of the Kruger National Park. Journal of the South Africa Veterinary Association 6, 233234.Google Scholar
Zarlenga, DS, Chute, MB, Martin, A and Kapel, CMO (1999) A multiplex PCR for unequivocal differentiation of all encapsulated and non-encapsulated genotypes of Trichinella. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 18591867.Google Scholar