Skip to main content Accessibility help

The microhabitat distribution of two Dactylogyrus species parasitizing the gills of the barbel, Barbus barbus

  • D. Kadlec (a1), A. Šimková (a1) (a2) and M. Gelnar (a1)


The microhabitat distribution of two congeneric species Dactylogyrus carpathicus and D. malleus (Monogenea) parasitizing the gills of the barbel (Barbus barbus L.) was investigated. We tested whether congeneric species exhibited microhabitat preference and whether interspecific interactions could be attributed to the microhabitat segregation of congeners. The outlying mean index method was used to evaluate species microhabitats. Gill variables (different microhabitats within gills) were used as environmental factors characterizing the gills. When abundances of both species were highest, and no significant difference was found between the abundance of the two species, the gill segments and gill areas were the most important factors segregating the Dactylogyrus species on the gills. Niche overlap was low within each of the four gill arches, and parasites were segregated in the same microhabitats within each gill arch. When abundances of both species were low, each monogenean species was segregated at the level of the gill arches. When abundances of both species increased, the niche and overlap between species increased. The distribution of both congeneric species confirmed microhabitat preference within the gills. The results suggest that microhabitat preference is dependent on species abundances, species being segregated in the case of low abundance, possibly to increasing mating opportunities. Both niche and overlap between species increased with species abundance. In the case of the high abundance of both species, microhabitat preference seems to be related to interspecific interactions between monogenean species, as previously found for endoparasitic species.


Corresponding author

*Fax: +420 5 41211214 E-mail:


Hide All
Bagge, A.M. & Valtonen, E.T. (1996) Experimental study on the influence of paper and pulp mill effluent on the gill parasite communities of roach (Rutilus rutilus). Parasitology 112, 499508.
Buchmann, K. (1989) Microhabitats of monogenean gill parasites on European eel (Anguilla anguilla). Folia Parasitologica 36, 321329.
Buchmann, K. & Bresciani, J. (1998) Microenvironmnet of Gyrodactylus derjavini on rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss: association between mucous cell density in skin and site selection. Parasitology Research 84, 1724.
Buchmann, K. & Lindenstrom, T. (2002) Interactions between monogenean parasites and their fish hosts. International Journal for Parasitology 32, 309319.
Bush, A.O. & Holmes, J.C. (1986) Internal helminths of lesser scaup ducks: an interactive community. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, 142152.
Bush, A.O., Lafferty, K.D., Lotz, J.M. & Shostack, A.W. (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575583.
Dolédec, S., Chessel, D. & Gimaret-Carpentier, C. (2000) Niche separation in community analysis: a new method. Ecology 81, 29142927.
El Hafidi, F., Berrada-Rkhami, O., Bennazzou, T. & Gabrion, C. (1998) Microhabitat distribution and coexistence of Microcotylidae (Monogenea) on the gills of the striped mullet Mugil cephalus: chance or competition? Parasitology Research 84, 315320.
Geets, A., Coene, H. & Ollevier, F. (1997) Ectoparasites of the whitespotted rabbitfish, Siganus sutor (Valenciennes, 1835) of the Kenyan Coast: distribution within the host population and site selection on the gills. Parasitology 115, 6979.
Gelnar, M., Svobodová, Z. & Vykusová, B. (1990) Eudiplozoon nipponicum (Goto, 1891) – acclimatization of parasite in Czech ponds. Czech Fishery Bulletin 1, 1118.
Gussev, A.V. (1985) Metazoa parasites. Part I. pp. 1424in Bauer, O.N.(Ed.) Identification key to parasites of freshwater fish. Vol. 2. Leningrad, Publ. House Nauka.
Gutiérez, P.A. & Martorelli, S.R. (1999) Niche preferences and spatial distribution of Monogenea on the gills of Pimelodus maculatus in Rio de la Plata (Argentina). Parasitology 119, 183188.
Holmes, J.C. (1973) Site selection by parasitic helminths: interspecific interactions, site segregation, and their importance to the development of helminth communities. Canadian Journal of Zoology 51, 333347.
Kennedy, C.R. & Bush, A.O. (1992) Species richness in helminth communities: the importance of multiple congeners. Parasitology 104, 189197.
Koskivaara, M., Valtonen, E.T. & Vuori, K.M. (1992) Microhabitat distribution and coexistence of Dactylogyrus species (Monogenea) on the gills of roach. Parasitology 104, 273281.
Paperna, I. (1964) Competitive exclusion of Dactylogyrus extensus by Dactylogyrus vastator (Trematoda, Monogenea) on the gills of rare carp. Journal of Parasitology 50, 9498.
Pianka, E.C. (1976) Competition and niche theory, pp. 141141in May, R.M.(Ed.) Theoretical ecology. Principles and applications. London, Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Poulin, R. (1998) Evolutionary ecology of parasites. New York, Chapman and Hall.
Poulin, R. (2001) Interactions between species and the structure of helminth communities. Parasitology 122, (Suppl.), S3S11.
Ramasamy, P. & Ramalingam, K. (1989) The occurrence, site specificity and frequency distribution of Bicotyle vellavoli on Pampus chinensis and Pampus argenteus. International Journal for Parasitology 19, 761767.
Ramasamy, P., Ramalingam, K., Hanna, R.E.B. & Halton, D.W. (1985) Microhabitats of gill parasites (Monogenea and Copepoda) of teleosts (Scomberoides spp.). International Journal for Parasitology 15, 385397.
Reichard, M., Jurajda, P., Šimková, A. & Matějusová, I. (2002) Size-related habitat use by bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus) in a regulated lowland river. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2, 112122.
Rohde, K. (1977) A non-competitive mechanism responsible for restricting niches in parasites. Zoologishe Anzeiger 199, 164172.
Rohde, K. (1979) A critical evaluation of intrinsic and extrinsic factors responsible for niche restriction in parasites. American Naturalist 114, 648671.
Rohde, K. (1991) Intra- and interspecific interactions in low density populations in resource-rich habitats. Oikos 60, 91104.
Rohde, K. & Hobbs, R. (1986) Species segregation: competition or reinforcement of reproductive barriers? pp. 189199in Cremin, M., Dobson, C. & Moorhouse, D.E.(Eds) Parasite lives. Papers on parasites, their hosts and their associations to honour J. F. A. Sprent. St Lucia, London and New York, University of Queensland Press.
Rohde, K., Hayward, C., Heap, M. & Gosper, D. (1994) A tropical assemblage of ectoparasites: gill and head parasites of Lethrinus miniatus (Teleostei, Lethrinidae). International Journal for Parasitology 24, 10311053.
Šimková, A., Desdevises, Y., Gelnar, M. & Morand, S. (2000) Co-existence of nine gill ectoparasites (Dactylogyrus: Monogenea) parasitizing the roach (Rutilus rutilus L.): history and present ecology. International Journal for Parasitology 10, 10771088.
]#x0160;imková, A., Ondra[ccaron]ková, M., Gelnar, M. & Morand, S. (2002) Morphology and coexistence of congeneric ectoparasite species: reinforcement of reproductive isolation? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 76, 125135.
Stock, T.M. & Holmes, J.C. (1988) Functional relationship and microhabitats distribution on enteric helminths of grebes (Podicipedidae): the evidence for interactive communities. Journal of Parasitology 74, 214227.
Thioulouse, J., Chessel, D., Dolédec, S. & Olivier, J.M. (1997) ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Statistics and Computing 7, 7583.
Tokeshi, M. (1999) Species coexistence: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. London, Blackwell Science.
Wootten, R. (1974) The spatial distribution of Dactylogyrus amphibothrium on the gills of ruffe Gymnocephalus cernua and its relation to the relative amounts of water passing over the parts of the gills. Journal of Helminthology 48, 167174.
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis. 4th edn. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.

The microhabitat distribution of two Dactylogyrus species parasitizing the gills of the barbel, Barbus barbus

  • D. Kadlec (a1), A. Šimková (a1) (a2) and M. Gelnar (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed