Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T15:44:49.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of an enzymatic immunohistochemical technique in human trichinellosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

G.J.M. Ben
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 1113 Buenos Aires, Argentina
S.L. Malmassari
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 1113 Buenos Aires, Argentina
G.G. Nuñez
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 1113 Buenos Aires, Argentina
S.N. Costantino
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 1113 Buenos Aires, Argentina
S.M. Venturiello*
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Buenos Aires, Junín 956, 1113 Buenos Aires, Argentina
*
Author for correspondence.

Abstract

A comparative study was undertaken between an enzymatic immunohistochemical technique (EIT) developed for the diagnosis of human trichinellosis and the indirect immunofluorescence test (IIF), analysing sera from outbreaks of human trichinellosis in Argentina. The HIT was developed using a biotinylated anti-human gammaglobulin and a preformed macromolecular complex of avidin and biotinylated peroxidase. In both tests, the antigen used consisted of infected rat tissue sections containing muscle larval cysts of Trichinella spiralis. Results showed that the HIT closely correlated with IIP and also allowed diagnosis at an early stage of infection, thus helping to provide effective treatment for the disease. When the test was performed on sera from healthy individuals and those with other parasitic infections, cross-reactions were observed only with sera from patients with toxocariasis (1/8), Chagas' disease (3/17) and four out of 100 healthy individuals. No cross-reactions were observed with sera from patients with toxoplasmosis (0/7) or hydatidosis (0/8). Assay sensitivity was 100% and its specificity 93%. Since it renders no false negative results, BIT is an effective screening tool for detecting infection and should prove to be an important diagnostic technique for trichinellosis in rural areas and for epidemiological surveys.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brzosko, W., Gancarz, Z. & Nowoslawski, A. (1965) Immunofluorescence in the serological diagnosis of Trichinella spiralis infection. Experimental Medicine and Microbiology 17, 355365.Google ScholarPubMed
Chapa-Ruiz, M.R., Salinas, Tobon M.R. & Garcia-Latorre, E. (1990) Recognition of Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae antigens by sera from humans infected with this parasite and its potential use in diagnosis. Bulletin de la Societé Française de Parasitologie 8, 951954.Google Scholar
Coltorti, E.A. (1981) Evaluación de la inmunofluorescencia indirecta en el diagnóstico y la seroepidemiología de la triquinosis humana. Acta Bioquímica Clinica Latinoamericana 15, 599607.Google Scholar
Feldmeier, H., Fischer, H. & Blaumeiser, G. (1986) Kinetics of humoral response during the acute and the convalescent phase of human trichinosis. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie und Hygiene 264, 221234.Google Scholar
Gamble, H.R., Rapic, D., Marinculic, A. & Murrell, K.D. (1988) Influence of cultivation conditions on specificity of excretory-secretory antigens for the immunodiagnosis of trichinellosis. Veterinary Parasitology 13, 349361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, G.J. (1959) Fluorescent antibody studies of Trichinella spiralis infections. Journal of Infection and Disease 105, 97101.Google ScholarPubMed
Last, J.M. (1989) in Salvat, (Ed.) Diccionario de epidemiologia. 97 pp. Spain, Salvat.Google Scholar
Ljungström, I. (1974) Antibody response to Trichinella spiralis. pp. 449460in Kim, C.W. (Ed.) Trichinellosis. New York, Intext Educational Publishers.Google Scholar
Ljungström, I. (1983) Immunodiagnosis in man. pp. 403424in Campbell, W.C. (Ed.) Trichinella and trichinosis. New York, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OIE (1990) Resolution N° XI, Internal Parasitic Diseases with Reference to Immunological Response. Scientific and Technical Review. Office International des Epizootics 9, 597.Google Scholar
Ruitenberg, E.J., Ljungström, I., Steerenberg, A. & Buys, J. (1975) Application of immunofluorescence and immunoenzyme methods in the serodiagnosis of T. spiralis infection. Annual New York Academy Science 254, 296303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toma, B., Dufour, M., Sanaa, J.J., Bénet, P., Ellis, F., Moutou, F. & Louzá, A. (1995) Le despitage des maladies infectieuceus animales. pp. 3988in Toma, B., Dufour, M., Sanaa, J.J., Bénet, P., Ellis, F., Moutou, F. & Louzá, A. (Eds) Epidemiologie appliquée a la lutte collective centre les maladies animales transmissibles majeures. France, AEEMA.Google Scholar