Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Information:

  • Access
  • Cited by 1

Actions:

      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Dispersion of Echinococcus granulosus eggs from infected dogs under natural conditions in Patagonia, Argentina
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Dispersion of Echinococcus granulosus eggs from infected dogs under natural conditions in Patagonia, Argentina
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Dispersion of Echinococcus granulosus eggs from infected dogs under natural conditions in Patagonia, Argentina
        Available formats
        ×
Export citation

Abstract

Cystic echinococcosis caused by Echinococcus granulosus is a major zoonosis of public health significance in the Patagonian region of Argentina. This investigation sought to test the hypothesis that the persistence and dispersion of the parasite eggs can be explained by physical and meteorological parameters along with final host infection and behaviour. This observational study was carried out over a five-year period within an enclosure where two dogs harbouring a worm burden ranging from 100 to 1000 mature adult E. granulosus, as well as two uninfected dogs, had previously been kept for six months. Environmental canine faeces, topsoil, pond water, and sediment samples were examined to control for the presence of eggs and coproantigens of the parasite using microscope-based techniques and copro-ELISA plus copro-Western Blot tests. The parasite eggs were detected up to 41 months later in faeces from infected dogs, soil and sediment, and coproantigen tests remained positive for up to 70 months in faeces. Overall, parasite eggs were found within a maximum distance of 115 m from the contaminated dog faeces deposition site. Our findings indicate that under Patagonian environmental conditions, egg persistence and dispersion seem to be related to the worm burden and habits of the infected dog, to prevailing wind direction and to the existence of low bushes as well as natural bodies of water. The present study is the first to provide direct evidence of interaction between bioclimatic conditions and E. granulosus egg dispersion under Patagonian field conditions.

Introduction

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a parasitic zoonosis caused by the Echinococcus granulosus cestode with intermediate (sheep and other domestic livestock, omnivores and lagomorphs) and final (carnivores, usually dogs) hosts. The parasite eggs are released into the environment in the faeces of the definitive host and contaminate the soil and water. Consequently, the environment represents a potential source of infection for humans (Shaikenov et al., 2004; Umhang et al., 2017).

This zoonosis is endemic in many South American countries (Cucher et al., 2016), and it is a major public health and economic problem in the Patagonian region of Argentina (Pierangeli et al., 2007).

To date, most studies modelling Echinococcus spp. transmission have focused on determining the influence of environmental parameters on the risk of infection with E. multilocularis, causal agent of alveolar echinococcosis (AE) (Veit et al., 1995; Giraudoux et al., 2003, 2013; Danson et al., 2004; Guislain et al., 2007, 2008; Burlet et al., 2011). Based on these studies, Atkinson et al. (2013) proposed that the transmission of echinococcosis could be influenced by climate change and anthropogenic factors through changes in animal population dynamics, spatial overlap of competent hosts, and the creation of favourable weather conditions for egg survival and dispersion.

In terms of the definitive host, an association of CE risk infection with free-roaming dog movements has been suggested by some authors (Moro et al., 2004; Van Kesteren et al., 2013). In addition to this, other authors, including Vaniscotte et al. (2011), have proposed a relationship between the behavioural pattern of foxes and the risk of E. multilocularis. For instance, AE might have been introduced to Hokkaido from Kunashiri Island, which is located 15 km off the north-eastern coast of Hokkaido, through migration of infected foxes during the winter (Satoh et al., 2005). Other than the above-mentioned studies, there has been virtually no research on the influence of definitive host behaviour on the dispersion of Echinococcus eggs.

Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, over the last 27 years only two studies have provided direct evidence of interaction between bioclimatic conditions and E. granulosus egg distribution (Wachira et al., 1991; Chaâbane-Banaoues et al., 2015). This lack of information becomes relevant when we consider the heterogeneous distribution of the disease in the world. Besides, the latest reviews on this subject have recognized that numerous studies have been performed on drivers of environmental distribution of E. multilocularis eggs, yet they found an absence of empirical evidence on the same matter in E. granulosus eggs (Burlet et al., 2011; Atkinson et al., 2012, 2013). This gap encouraged us to publish our findings, and our study suggests an exploratory working model that could be a starting point for further research on spatial investigations in CE. We carried out this study to add evidence about E. granulosus egg occurrence under Patagonian environmental conditions with the aim of testing the hypothesis that in this region the persistence and dispersion of the parasite eggs can be explained by parameters such as landscape attributes, meteorological conditions and dog infection behaviour, and worm burden status.

Materials and methods

Setting and background

The investigation was carried out at the Hydatidosis Control Program HQ located in the village of Sarmiento (Province of Chubut, Argentina, 45°36′S, 69°5′W, 350 m above sea level). For the sake of background, the first trial to test the EG95 vaccine's effectiveness in Argentina (Lightowlers et al., 1999) was carried out here. For the purpose of this study, four dogs were dewormed with Praziquantel (5 mg/kg) and Albendazol (50 mg/kg). The dogs were kept in individual kennels in a restricted-access enclosure of 10,000 m2 under stringent conditions, and fed with balanced food and potable water. One month after deworming and following a fast of 24 hours, two of the dogs were infected with approximately 80,000 protoscoleces recovered from lung and liver hydatid cysts obtained from slaughtered sheep in the Sarmiento abattoir (Chubut, Argentina), following García Llamazares et al. (1997). The viability of protoscoleces was assessed by their flame cell activity, motility and ability to exclude 0.32% of Tripan Blue. Six months later, in order to determine the parasitic burden, dogs were dosed with 4 mg/kg of arecoline hydrobromide according to standard procedures (Schantz, 1973). The infected dogs harboured a parasitic burden ranging from 100 to 1000 mature adults of E. granulosus, as indicated by counts and optical microscopy, whereas the uninfected dogs yielded negative to parasites. The viability of the parasite eggs and the genotype of E. granulosus G1 sl has been described elsewhere (Sánchez Thevenet et al., 2005). The present longitudinal study started just after the four dogs—two of them infected and two uninfected—were removed from the enclosures. We then carried out our observational follow-up research over five subsequent years. As the study site was a restricted-access area, there were no other free-roaming dogs or animals within the enclosures.

Landscape characteristic and dispersion studies

The study site covers 10,000 m2. The vegetation is sparse and includes low bushes and natural pastures. A low-depth natural pond c. 10 m2 in size is located in the south-east sector. For the purpose of the model, the area was divided into subareas, depending on dog occupation. These subareas were identified as follows:

P (n = 4): plots occupied by every dog

A (n = 4): adjacent sectors to P, with a width of 10 m

M (n = 2): middle-distance sectors located 10–100 m from P plots

D (n = 4): distant sectors located > 100 m from P plots

Dogs were not allowed in subareas A, M and D.

Faecal samples

The original canine faeces remained outdoors, deposited onto the surface stratum of soil and exposed to natural environmental conditions over 70 months in the study site. Dog faeces were screened for E. granulosus eggs and for Echinococcus spp. coproantigen at 0 (T0), 41 (T41), 70 (T70) and 84 (T84) months of exposure under natural environmental conditions. Each faecal sample was composed of five individual scats collected from P plots occupied by infected or uninfected dogs. Each composite sample was divided into two aliquots, one of which was preserved at 4°C in 10% formaldehyde for coprological studies, and the other frozen at −70°C for 72 h to render E. granulosus eggs non-infective for coproantigen studies. Egg examination was carried out by standard ether-formalin-sedimentation and by centrifugal flotation techniques using a sucrose solution with a specific gravity of 1.27. Each sample was examined microscopically at 10× in triplicate and at 40× magnification under a Leica DM500 microscope. Echinococcus spp. coproantigen detection was carried out by means of a sandwich enzyme-linked inmunosorbent analysis (ELISA) as developed by Allan et al. (1992). Samples were first inactivated at −70°C for 72 h for coproantigen detection, as mentioned above, and then left to hydrate for 24 h after the addition of an equal volume of 0.3% (v/v) Tween in phosphate-buffered saline. After a final 30-minute sedimentation at 5135 × g, we stored 2.0 ml aliquants of the resulting supernatant at −20°C until further processing. The cut-off value for the ELISA capture test was 0.215OD ± 3 SD.

Environmental samples

Samples of topsoil, sludge sediment and water from the natural pond were analysed at each above-mentioned T0 to T84 month follow-up time.

Topsoil specimens were collected by means of random conglomerate sampling methods on the basis of the quadrant division scheme shown in fig. 1. From each quadrant we transferred five sub-fractions of approximately 50 g of surface soil within a 10 cm2 area 5 cm deep to a resealable polyethylene bag and kept the samples at 4°C until processing. Thus, a mean sample (from five component samples taken from each quadrant) was designed for parasitological examinations. A mean sample of sludge sediment was also gathered from the bottom of a natural pond by dragging from five different sectors. Following Sánchez Thevenet et al. (2004) and as a pretreatment, the mean topsoil and sludge sediment samples were ground and homogenized and a 2 g aliquant was sieved and dried in an oven at 25°C for 24 h. The moisture-free material was then processed using the methods of Dada and Lindquist (1979). Each sample was examined microscopically at 10× in triplicate and at 40× magnification under a Leica DM500 microscope. Aliquots of sieved material were preserved at −20°C and the genus-specific Echinococcus spp. antigen was detected by Western Blot following Guarnera et al. (2000).

Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the sampling design. Filled grey rectangles indicate plots occupied by dogs for six months. The diagram is not to scale. Numbers 1 to 50: quadrants of topsoil sampling. Quadrants 1–12: plots occupied by uninfected dogs. Quadrants 13–18 and 19–24: plots occupied by infected dogs with a worm burden of approximately of 1000 and 100 adults of E. granulosus, respectively. Quadrants 25–43: adjacent zone (A). Quadrants 44 and 45: medium zone (M). Quadrants 47–50: distant zone (D). 46: natural pond; w: predominant wind direction.

The water sample was collected from the pond surface in 8 l sterile polyethylene containers and stored, protected from light, at room temperature until processing. The water was centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1500 rpm to obtain a concentrate from a water sample of relevant size. The concentrate obtained was then processed by Willis flotation and Telemann sedimentation methods and the procedure monitored concurrently in triplicate by light microscopy at 10× and at 40× magnification using the Leica DM500 microscope.

Meteorological conditions

Throughout the period studied the climate corresponded to the inferior arid category, which is characterized by great thermal amplitude, with warm summers and cold winters with frequent frosts. The weather data were obtained from the Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria local meteorological station at Sarmiento-EEA (Chubut Province, Argentina). The temperature range over the period studied was −3 to + 37°C, with a mean annual temperature of + 10°C. There were also average winds and a low level of precipitation, under 300 mm/year.

Data analysis, biosafety regulations and ethical aspects

Double blind methods were applied to prevent biases during the sample examinations. Frequency distribution and summary measures were also used. Biosecurity measures were applied for studies of Echinococcus spp. eggs in accordance with Eckert et al. (2001) in all instances of the study. The study was accepted and approved by the Postgraduate Committee of the Faculty of Natural Sciences of the National University of the Patagonia, San Juan Bosco (Argentina).

Results

A total of 224 composite samples were analysed during the whole period studied: 16 dog faeces, 200 topsoil, four sediments and four water samples.

In faeces from infected dogs, E. granulosus eggs were observed from T0 up to T41, whereas the coproantigen test remained positive up to T70. Table 1 summarizes the parasitological and coproantigen results in the faecal samples.

Table 1. Echinococcus granulosus eggs and Echinococcus coproantigen presence in dog faecal samples exposed at different times under natural environmental conditions in Sarmiento (Chubut province, Patagonia, Argentina), by dog infection status.

UI and U2: uninfected dogs (controls)

I1: infected dog with a worm burden of approximately 1000 adults of E. granulosus

I2: infected dog with a worm burden of approximately 100 adults of E. granulosus

In total, 20/200 topsoil samples resulted positive for taeniid-E. granulosus-like eggs during the whole study period (table 2): 11/50 at T0, 9/50 at T41, 0/50 at T70 and 0/50 at T84. The P sector occupied by a dog with a burden of approximately 1000 adult E. granulosus yielded 100% (6/6) and 83.3% (5/6) of the soil quadrants positive for eggs of the parasite at T0 and T41, respectively. The P sector occupied by a dog that had a parasite burden of 100 adults yielded 83.3% (5/6) and 50% (3/6) of the quadrants positive for eggs at T0 and T41, respectively. The other positive sample at T41 corresponded to quadrant number 38, located at the adjacent sector (A) in the direction of prevailing winds (see fig. 1). The coproantigen test was positive in 9/12 of topsoil samples at T0, and 2/12 at T41; in both cases the samples were from P quadrants occupied by infected dogs. As an additional qualitative observation, it is worth noting that dogs used to defaecate at one end of their plot, and therefore most of their faeces were accumulated in that sector. Coincidentally, the soil quadrants that were positive for parasite eggs and coproantigen test were those close to this sector.

Table 2. Presence of taeniid-E. granulosus-like eggs in topsoil samples collected at different times from field quadrants in Sarmiento (Chubut province, Patagonia, Argentina).

PU1 and PU2: plots occupied by uninfected dog

PI1: plot occupied by infected dog with a parasitic burden of approximately 1000 adults of E. granulosus

PI2: plots occupied by infected dog with a parasitic burden of approximately 100 adults of E. granulosus

A: adjacent zones to dog plots (P), with a width of 10 m

M: middle-distance sectors located 10–100 m from P plots

D: distant areas located > 100 m from dog plots

Sludge sediment samples were negative at T0 and positive for taeniid-E. granulosus-like eggs at T41. None of the water samples were positive for eggs at any time. Other elements, such as diatoms and cyanobacteria, were detected in these water samples.

Discussion

This study provides insights into the dispersion of E. granulosus eggs under natural field conditions in Patagonia, showing that parasite eggs were found within a maximum distance of 115 m from the deposition site over the course of 41 months. However, 95% of the soil samples positive for parasite eggs came from the sectors occupied by dogs or where they usually relieved themselves.

Up to now the models used to determine the dispersion of Taeniidae eggs in the environment have mainly used Taenia hydatigena, T. saginata, T. pisiformis and E. multilocularis (Atkinson et al., 2013). Taeniid eggs can disperse widely across the environment. Previous studies in New Zealand showed that T. hydatigena eggs were dispersed up to 80 m over 10 days (Roberts et al., 1987), and although the majority of the eggs remained within a radius of 180 m from the deposition site, they could still be dispersed up to a distance of 10 km or over 30,000 ha via biological agents, such as insects (Gemmell, 1997). It has also been shown that T. hydatigena eggs could disperse over 60 km as a consequence of the transfer of viable taeniid eggs by birds (Torgerson et al., 1995). In fact, viable eggs of T. saginata and T. pisiformis were recovered from bird faeces, as pointed out by Torgerson (2016). Recently, Lass et al. (2015) demonstrated for the first time the contamination of fresh fruit, vegetables and mushrooms with E. multilocularis eggs. As sampling sites were located away from homesteads, at distances ranging from a few metres to several kilometres, it seems logical to think that some kind of parasite egg dispersion mechanism from dog faeces to the environment was taking place. In our model a sample from pond sediment as well as some topsoil samples from quadrants located in the direction of the prevailing winds (NE direction) were positive for taeniid-E. granulosus-like eggs after 41 months. This observation is in agreement with the proposal of Bourée (2001) that wind and water influence the dispersion of E. granulosus eggs into the environment.

For E. granulosus, environmental factors that promote the creation of improved conditions for egg survival, such as cool temperatures, humidity and shade, can result in their presence in any given area (Wachira et al., 1991; Van Kesteren et al., 2013; Cadavid Restrepo et al., 2018). Thus, we argue that the sparse vegetation of low bushes and the mean cool environmental temperatures in the study area can act as protection against excessive exposure to sunlight and desiccation, which increases the probability of worm egg survival. Similar results and conclusions were reached for the viability characterization of the E. granulosus egg samples generated in the present survey, as described elsewhere (Sánchez Thevenet et al., 2003, 2005).

With regards to dog parasite burden and the presence of eggs in soil, in plots occupied by infected dogs, eggs were found in most of the topsoil samples studied after 41 months. Moreover, the greater number of positive soil samples came from plots occupied by the dog with the highest worm burden. Recently, we proved that T. hydatigena eggs are clumped when they are outside the proglottids originally containing them, suggesting that clumping could be a survival strategy for these eggs in the face of adverse environmental conditions (Sánchez Thevenet et al., 2017). In addition to this, we demonstrated that triacylglycerols (TAG) play a key role in the maintenance of embryonic viability in T. hydatigena eggs, a survival strategy in the environment outside the host (Sánchez Thevenet et al., 2010). Generalizing these observations to E. granulosus, it may be possible that the greater the dog parasite burden the greater the possibility of generating clumps of eggs that then assure their persistence and dispersion in the environment. Thus, our findings support the notion that dogs’ infection burden is indeed a key determinant of the permanence and dispersion of E. granulosus eggs in the environment, and also that the TAG depots could liberate eggs from dependence on external energy sources, thus providing an endogenous reserve that could be utilized when external nutrients are unavailable.

The persistence of the E. granulosus life cycle is linked to the long-lasting viability of parasite eggs in the environment. In a previous study, we demonstrated that once released in the environment, parasite eggs may remain viable and at the semi-senescent stage for at least 41 months under Patagonian climate conditions, thus keeping their capacity to generate infection in the intermediary ovine host (Sánchez Thevenet et al., 2005). In this subsequent study, we did not find parasite eggs in either dog faeces or topsoil samples after 70 months of permanence of the contaminated dog scats. However, we corroborated that the coproantigens of E. granulosus remain positive after 70 months in faeces. These findings have enormous practical implications, as this new laboratory-based tool is currently being implemented for surveillance in disease control programmes (Allan and Craig, 2006; Pierangeli et al., 2010).

Long-distance dispersion of eggs is important for CE transmission dynamics at larger spatial scales, but our understanding of this phenomenon is mostly based on mathematical modelling rather than field data. It is noteworthy that when field data are included in the aforementioned models, most of them constitute data on the prevalence of the disease in host species, rather than information on the decay of the quantity and viability of parasite eggs in the environment, and their distribution as a consequence of the burden of infection or the behaviour of the dog. This paper attempts to enhance the information on this question, providing evidence from a real environmental scenario. The present prototype is open to comments, suggestions and contributions. It is important to take into account that the main limitations of the study include the low sensitivity of the technique used to screen eggs in water samples and the limited accuracy of the Western Blot method applied in soil samples to confirm the identity of Echinococcus eggs. We thus consider it necessary to optimize technical options applied in future investigation. As has been pointed out by Umhang et al. (2017), there is a need to improve the standardization of technical options to study samples such as soil, water or sediments. Very few data are currently available on Echinococcus species in soil and other environmental matrices (Shaikenov et al., 2004; Szostakowska et al., 2014; Lass et al., 2015; Umhang et al., 2017). One technical option proposed to confirm them as E. granulosus eggs is polymerase chain reaction (PCR). As Alvarez Rojas et al. (2018) point out in their latest review on assessing the contamination of food and the environment with taeniid eggs (including Echinococcus eggs), the isolation and molecular identification of the eggs is technically challenging and little standardized. Unfortunately, we have not had the opportunity to perform PCR studies on our soil samples. That is why we use the expression taeniid-E. granulosus-like eggs. Furthermore, we have not studied the possibility of egg transport either by birds or by arthropods, an unexplored area in the echinococcosis research world.

Finally, it is worth highlighting the suggestion in Chaâbane-Banaoues et al. (2015, 2016) and Souto et al. (2016) in relation to the fact that environmental parameters determine the potential occurrence of parasite eggs, while other parameters relating to human behaviour will interact to influence prevalence of disease in the population. Our results validate this hypothesis and show that the dispersion of E. granulosus eggs in the Patagonian region can be explained by factors such as landscape attributes, meteorological conditions and final host infection burden and behaviour. The development of spatio-temporal models including real data on dispersion drivers to determine risk of CE is essential to design more cost-effective control strategies across diverse settings. Since the studies by Gemmell et al. in the 1970s and 1980s there have been almost no reports on the dispersion of Echinococcus granulosus eggs from infected dogs, perhaps due to the difficulty in undertaking biohazardous and long-term investigations with infected dogs. Therefore, we think that the value of the present study is to contribute significantly to the knowledge we have about natural dissemination of E. granulosus eggs from dogs and the contamination profile of local environments.

Author ORCIDs

P. Sánchez Thevenet, 0000-0001-7018-6128

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Sanitary Technician Carlos Terán, from the Zoonoses Department of Chubut Province, Argentina, for his support in sample collection.

Financial support

This study was partially supported by Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco (ResCS126/06).

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

See Materials and methods section.

References

Allan, JC et al. (1992) Coproantigen detection for inmunodiagnosis of echinococcosis and taeniasis in dogs and humans. Parasitology 104, 347355.
Allan, JC and Craig, PS (2006) Coproantigens in taeniasis and echinococcosis. Parasitology International 55, S75S80.
Alvarez Rojas, C, Mathis, A and Deplazes, P (2018) Assessing the contamination of food and the environment with Taenia and Echinococcus eggs and their zoonotic transmission. Current Clinical Microbiology Reports 5, 154163.
Atkinson, JM et al. (2012) Environmental changes impacting Echinococcus transmission: research to support predictive surveillance and control. Global Change Biology 19, 677688.
Atkinson, JM et al. (2013) Synthesising 30 years of mathematical modelling of Echinococcus transmission. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 29, e2386.
Bourée, P (2001) Hydatidosis: dynamics of transmission. World Journal of Surgery 25, 49.
Burlet, P, Deplazes, P and Hegglin, D (2011) Age, season and spatio-temporal factors affecting the prevalence of Echinococcus multilocularis and Taenia taeniaeformis in Arvicola terrestris. Parasites & Vectors 4, 6.
Chaâbane-Banaoues, R et al. (2015) Infection of dogs with Echinococcus granulosus: causes and consequences in an hyperendemic area. Parasites & Vectors 8, 231.
Chaâbane-Banaoues, R et al. (2016) Environmental contamination by Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato eggs in relation to slaughterhouses in urban and rural areas in Tunisia. The Korean Journal of Parasitology 54, 113118.
Cadavid Restrepo, AM et al. (2018) Spatiotemporal patterns and environmental drivers of human echinococcoses over a twenty-year period in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. Parasites & Vectors 11, 108.
Cucher, MA et al. (2016) Cystic echinococcosis in South America: systematic review of species and genotypes of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in humans and natural domestic hosts. Tropical Medicine & International Health 21, 166175.
Dada, BJ and Lindquist, L (1979) Studies on flotation techniques of the recovery of helminth eggs from soil and the prevalence of eggs of Toxocara spp. in some Kansas public places. Journal of the American Veterinary Medicine Association 174, 12081210.
Danson, FM et al. (2004) Landscape dynamics and risk modeling of human alveolar echinococcosis. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 70, 359366.
Eckert, J et al. (2001) WHO/OIE Manual on Echinococcosis in Humans and Animals: A Public Health Problem of Global Concern. Paris: World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) & WHO.
García Llamazares, JL et al. (1997) Fertility and viability study of hydatid cysts from ovine. Revista Española de Salud Pública 71, 445449. (In Spanish, with English abstract)
Gemmell, MA (1997) Quantifying the transmission dynamics of the family Taeniidae with particular reference to Echinococcus spp. In Andersen, FL, Ouhelli, H and Kachami, M (eds), Compendium of Cystic Echinococcosis in Africa and in the Middle Eastern Countries with Special Reference to Morocco. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University, pp. 5473.
Giraudoux, P et al. (2003) Interactions between landscape changes and host communities can regulate Echinococcus multilocularis transmission. Parasitology 127, S121S131.
Giraudoux, P et al. (2013) Drivers of Echinococcus multilocularis transmission in China: small mammal diversity, landscape or climate? PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, e2045.
Guarnera, EA et al. (2000) Canine echinococcosis an alternative for surveillance epidemiology. Veterinary Parasitology 88, 131134.
Guislain, MH et al. (2007) Fox faeces and vole distribution on a local range: ecological data in a parasitological perspective for Echinococcus multilocularis. Parasite 14, 299308.
Guislain, MH et al. (2008) Ecological and biological factors involved in the transmission of Echinococcus multilocularis in the French Ardennes. Journal of Helminthology 82, 143151.
Lass, A et al. (2015) The first detection of Echinococcus multilocularis DNA in environmental fruit, vegetable, and mushroom samples using nested PCR. Parasitology Research 114, 40234029.
Lightowlers, MW et al. (1999) Vaccination trials in Australia and Argentina confirm the effectiveness of the EG95 hydatid vaccine in sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 29, 531534.
Moro, PL et al. (2004) Short report: endemic focus of cystic echinococcosis in a coastal city of Peru. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 71, 327329.
Pierangeli, NB et al. (2007) Heterogeneous distribution of human cystic echinococcosis after a long-term control program in Neuquén, Patagonia Argentina. Parasitology International 56, 149155.
Pierangeli, NB et al. (2010) Usefulness and validation of a coproantigen test for dog echinococcosis screening in the consolidation phase of hydatid control in Neuquén, Argentina. Parasitology International 59, 394399.
Roberts, MG, Lawson, JR and Gemmell, MA (1987) Population dynamics in echinococcosis and cysticercosis: evaluation of the biological parameters of Taenia hydatigena and comparison with those of Echinococcus granulosus. Parasitology 94, 161180.
Sánchez Thevenet, P et al. (2003) Presence and persistence of intestinal parasites in canine fecal material collected from the environment in the Province of Chubut, Argentine Patagonia. Veterinary Parasitology 117, 263269.
Sánchez Thevenet, P et al. (2004) An eco-epidemiological study of contamination of soil with infective forms of intestinal parasites. European Journal of Epidemiology 19, 481489.
Sánchez Thevenet, P et al. (2005) Viability and infectiousness of Echinococcus granulosus aged under natural conditions of inferior arid climate. Veterinary Parasitology 10, 7177.
Sánchez Thevenet, P, Basualdo, JA and Alvarez, HM (2010) A descriptive study of the occurrence and significance of lipids in Taenia hydatigena eggs. Veterinary Parasitology 169, 111116.
Sánchez Thevenet, P, Alvarez, HM and Basualdo, JA (2017) Survival, physical and physiological changes of Taenia hydatigena eggs under different conditions of water stress. Experimental Parasitology 177, 4756.
Satoh, M et al. (2005) Short report: Echinococcus multilocularis confirmed on Kunashiri Island, 15 kilometers from the eastern part of Hokkaido, Japan. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 72, 284288.
Schantz, PM (1973) A guide to the use of arecoline hydrobromide for the diagnosis of Echinococcus granulosus infection in the dog. Boletín Chileno de Parasitolgía 28, 8190.
Shaikenov, BS et al. (2004) The use of a polymerase chain reaction to detect Echinococcus granulosus (G1 strain) eggs in soil samples. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 71, 441443.
Souto, MG, Sánchez Thevenet, P and Basualdo Farjat, J (2016) Evaluation of the presence of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato in the environment and in hosts in a region endemic for hydatidosis in the province of Chubut (Argentina). Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports 6, 4246.
Szostakowska, B et al. (2014) First finding of Echinococcus multilocularis DNA in soil: preliminary survey in Varmia-Masuria Province, northeast Poland. Veterinary Parasitology 203, 7379.
Torgerson, PR (2016) Fresh fruits, vegetables, and mushrooms as transmission vehicles for Echinococcus multilocularis. Parasitology Research 115, 24852488.
Torgerson, PR et al. (1995) Further evidence for the long distance dispersal of taeniid eggs. International Journal for Parasitology 25, 265267.
Umhang, G et al. (2017) A flotation/sieving method to detect Echinococcus multilocularis and Toxocara spp. eggs in soil by real-time PCR. Parasite 24, 28.
Van Kesteren, F et al. (2013) Dog ownership, dog behaviour and transmission of Echinococcus spp. in the Alay Valley, southern Kyrgyzstan. Parasitology 140, 16741684.
Vaniscotte, A et al. (2011) Role of dog behavior and environmental fecal contamination in transmission of Echinococcus multilocularis in Tibetan communities. Parasitology 138, 13161329.
Veit, P et al. (1995) Influence of environmental factors on the infectivity of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs. Parasitology 110, 7986.
Wachira, TM, Macpherson, CN and Gathuma, JM (1991) Release and survival of Echinococcus eggs in different environments in Turkana, and their possible impact on the incidence of hydatidosis in man and livestock. Journal of Helminthology 65, 5561.