Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Information:

  • Access
  • Cited by 10

Actions:

      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Normal modes of a coupled ice-shelf/sub-ice-shelf cavity system
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Normal modes of a coupled ice-shelf/sub-ice-shelf cavity system
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Normal modes of a coupled ice-shelf/sub-ice-shelf cavity system
        Available formats
        ×
Export citation

Abstract

Ice shelves and ice tongues are dynamically coupled to their cavities. Here we compute normal modes (eigenfrequencies and eigenfunctions) of this coupled system using a thin-plate approximation for the ice shelf and potential water flow in the ice-shelf cavity. Our results show that normal modes depend not only on the ice-shelf parameters (length, thickness, Young’s modulus, etc.) but also on the cavity depth. The dominant eigenmodes are higher for ice shelves floating over deeper cavities; they are also higher for shorter ice shelves and ice tongues (<50 km long). The higheigenfrequency eigenmodes are primarily controlled by the ice flexure and have similar periods to sea swell. These results suggest that both long ocean waves with periods of 100–400 s and shorter sea swell with periods of 10–20 s can have strong impacts on relatively short ice shelves and ice tongues by exciting oscillations with their eigenfrequencies, which can lead to iceberg calving and, in some circumstances, ice-shelf disintegration.

Introduction

A growing body of observations of the ocean wave effects on ice shelves and ice tongues (e.g. MacAyeal and others, 2006; Cathles and others, 2009; Bromirski and others, 2010; Brunt and others, 2011) has revived interest in various aspects of ice-shelf/wave interaction. In the late 1970s/early 1980s Holdsworth and Glynn (1978, 1981) proposed that iceberg calving from ice tongues can be a result of ice-shelf vibration excited by ocean swell. Such vibration, especially with frequencies close to those of the ice-shelf normal modes (eigenfrequencies), can persist and cause significant flexural stresses, leading to ice-shelf fracturing and calving. Considering the effects of monochromatic long waves on the ice stress regime, Sergienko (2010) demonstrated that wave-induced flexural stresses are sufficiently large that, when superimposed on other existing stresses, they can lead to fracture initiation and development. Holdsworth and Glynn (1978, 1981) used numerical models to compute normal modes of a two-dimensional (plan view) ice tongue floating on inviscid water. In this study, similar to many other studies of ice-shelf flexure (e.g. Reeh, 1968; Vaughan, 1995), a one-dimensional ice shelf (or ice tongue) is considered, and analytical expressions for their normal modes are derived.

Geometry and Models

We consider an ice shelf or ice tongue with constant thickness, H, floating on inviscid sea water of depth H c (Fig. 1). It is assumed for the purpose of computing normal modes that there are no variations in the transverse direction, i.e. the plane-strain approximation is adopted. As in previous studies, floating ice is treated as elastic material with a constitutive relation described by Hooke’s law. This choice is justified by the fact that the anticipated period of oscillations (seconds to hours) is short compared with the Maxwell time, which is defined to be the characteristic time required to create significant viscous deformations after an initial elastic deformation (Maxwell, 1867).

Fig. 1. Model geometry. I. ice-shelf domain; II. ocean domain. Conditions on boundaries 1–4 are described in the text.

Ice flexure

The thin-beam approximation is used in the treatment of floating-ice flexure (e.g. Timoshenko and Goodier, 1934). The main reason for employing this approximation in the computation of the normal modes of an ice shelf and its cavity is the small aspect ratio (ice thickness or cavity depth to the ice-shelf length) of this system. The thin-beam approximation is based on the following assumptions: (1) there is a neutral plane at the mid-plane of the ice that does not experience deformation; (2) vertical shear stresses are negligible; and (3) vertical cross sections in the ice that are parallel when the ice is undeformed remain parallel when the ice is deformed. These assumptions allow simplifications in the momentum-balance equations describing the ice stress regime, and vertical integration of these equations. The well-known thin-beam equation describing flexure of an elastic beam floating in inviscid water is

(1)

where η is the vertical displacement of the neutral plane, ρ i is the ice density, ρ w is the water density, g is the acceleration due to gravity, P w is the wave-induced pressure (described below), and D is the effective flexural rigidity

(2)

where E is the Young’s modulus and ν the Poisson ratio.

In circumstances where H(x) is spatially uniform, as in the present study, Eqn (1) can be rewritten as

(3)

Water flow

Following common practice in studies of wave interactions with sea ice (e.g. Squire, 2007), seawater in the sub-ice-shelf cavity is assumed inviscid and irrotational. Its velocity can be described by a potential, Φ,

(4)

where is sea-water velocity. We use the shallow-water approximation (e.g. Stoker, 1957) to describe waves in the ice-shelf cavity. This approximation is justified by the fact that the aspect ratio of sub-ice-shelf cavities is small. The governing equation for Φ in the sub-ice-shelf cavity is

(5)

A detailed derivation of this equation is given by Stoker (1957). In a linear theory, the wave-induced pressure felt by the ice shelf, P w, is

(6)

Flexural waves of the ice-shelf/sub-ice-shelf cavity system are described by Eqns (3), (5) and (6) and the corresponding boundary conditions described below. It is useful to write these equations again:

(7a)

(7b)

where the expression for P w (Eqn (6)) was taken into account. The two models used in this study are similar to those used by Vinogradov and Holdsworth (1985) to study ocean-wave effects on an ice-tongue stress regime and to investigate their dependence on the length of the ice tongue.

It should be noted that many glaciological studies disregard the coupling effect of the ice shelf and sea water underneath it (last one or two terms in Eqn (7a)), and prescribe an arbitrary motion of sea water in the cavity (e.g. Bassis and others, 2008; Lescarmontier and others, 2012). Such treatments are justifiable in circumstances where the primary interest is the effect of tides. In studies focused on the effects of waves with shorter wavelengths, the coupling needs to be taken into account, because the ice-shelf flexure excites waves in the cavity (Sergienko, 2010).

Normal Modes

The system of equations describing flexural interaction of the ice shelf with water underneath is Eqns (7). These equations are complemented by the following set of boundary conditions. We assume that the ice shelf is clamped at the grounding line (boundary 1 in Fig. 1)

(8a)

(8b)

At the ice front (boundary 2 in Fig. 1) the following conditions are satisfied

(9a)

(9b)

These conditions correspond to zero normal stress and bending moment at the ice front. The boundary condition for Φ at the grounding line (boundary 3 in Fig. 1) is

(10)

Since normal-mode oscillations are standing waves, there is no mass transport associated with them. Therefore, the boundary condition operating on the water layer at the ice front (boundary 4 in Fig. 1) is the no-flux condition, i.e.

(11)

The variable η can be eliminated from the above equations by differentiating Eqn (7a) with respect to t and substituting Eqn (7b). This yields a single equation for Φ:

(12)

Using separation of variables,

(13)

we arrive at

(14)

The above equation can be reduced to one involving T(t) only,

(15)

where ω is the eigenfrequency, if X(x) satisfies the equation

(16)

and boundary conditions

(17)

at the landward terminus of the sub-ice ocean cavity, and

(18)

at the ice front.

The general solution of Eqn (16) is

(19)

where C 1C 6 are unknown constants and

(20)

(21)

(22)

(23)

Substitution of X(x) in the form of Eqn (16) into boundary conditions, Eqns (1718), leads to a system of homogeneous linear equations for C 1C 6. This system has a nontrivial solution if its determinant is zero. Equating the determinant to zero generates a transcendental equation used to determine the eigenvalues, α,

(24)

where γ = αL. Roots of this equation are found numerically. The first three nonzero roots of Eqn (24) are γ 1 ≈ 4.2747, γ 2 ≈ 7.3268 and γ 3 ≈ 10.4716. For n > 3 the roots of this equation can be approximated as

(25)

Eigenvalues, αn , of Eqn (16) are

(26)

Equation (24) also has a trivial root, γ = 0. It corresponds to no motion in the system.

The expression for eigenfrequencies, ωn, is determined from Eqn (20), and can be written as

(27)

where un depends on ωn through Eqns (22) and (23). Equation (27) is a dispersion relationship written in an implicit form. The eigenfrequencies, ωn , corresponding to eigenvalues αn are the roots of this expression, and they are found numerically.

The corresponding eigenfunctions of Φ n are

(28)

The expressions for ηn eigenfunctions are determined from Eqn (7b).

Discussion and Conclusions

Figure 2 shows the first, most fundamental, normal modes of a variety of ice shelves with various geometries. Ice shelves with deeper cavities generally have shorter normal-mode periods. Ice shelves <100 km long with cavity depths larger than their thicknesses generally have periods of the first normal mode in the range 100–200 s. Longer ice shelves have longer normal-mode periods (e.g. the normal-mode period of a 100 km long and 200 m thick ice shelf above a 200 m deep cavity is ∼20 min).

Fig. 2. Period of the first, most fundamental normal modes of various ice shelves. (a) 50 km long and various ice thicknesses and cavity depths, period T (sec); (b) various lengths but with cavity depth equal to the ice thickness, period T (min). Note the difference in the period units between (a) and (b).

For higher modes the ice-shelf-flexure effects rapidly increase and shift the normal modes of the coupled system to frequencies higher than they would have been without ice-shelf flexure. As Figure 3a shows, higher normal modes are less sensitive to the depth of the cavity. However, their dependence on the ice-shelf length is similar to the lower modes (Fig. 3b). These results suggest that different floating tongues that usually have length ∼10–15 km will respond in a similar way to sea swell, regardless of the water depth underneath them. It is feasible that the uniform length of ice tongues can be explained by their natural oscillations and by the fact that their higher frequencies are primarily determined by ice flexure, and less dependent on the cavity or other aspects of ocean geometry.

Fig. 3. Same as Figure 2 for the 15th normal mode. Periods are in seconds.

The eigenfrequencies increase (eigenperiods decrease) rapidly as the modes increase. Figure 4 shows eigenperiods of an ice shelf 300 m thick, 50 km long with cavity depth 300 m. The periods of the 10th and 15th modes are ∼25 s and ∼12 s, respectively. These periods correspond to sea swell that is common around the Antarctic coast during the austral summer (e.g. Cathles and others, 2009). Hence, oscillations corresponding to 10–20 normal modes are likely to be excited.

Fig. 4. Periods of the normal modes of an ice shelf 300 m thick, 50 km long with a cavity 300 m deep.

A crucial question in the analysis of wave influences on ice shelves is whether waves in the open ocean can excite motions of the ice shelf that lead to the ice-shelf flexural stresses. Here the presented computation of normal modes of floating ice shelves demonstrates that for relatively short ice shelves or floating glaciers (≤50 km) the first, most fundamental, normal mode is in the 100–400 s period range, with higher-order modes following at shorter periods. This means that both long ocean waves with periodicities ≥200 s, and shorter waves with periodicities 10–20 s are likely to couple well with ice shelves and lead to significant stress effects, leading to iceberg calving (Holdsworth and Glynn, 1978). The long-period waves are formed as a result of nonlinear interaction of waves with shorter wavelength, and can be either created locally or travel from afar (e.g. Bromirski and others, 2010), and the wave energy in the sea-swell spectrum is abundant around Antarctica (e.g. NOAA WAVEWATCH, 2010). Therefore, short ice shelves and ice tongues are most susceptible to the mechanical effects of the ice/ocean interaction.

Another aspect that plays an important role, but is not considered in this study, is wave dissipation. Caused by turbulent processes and interaction with bottom topography, it tends to reduce the wave amplitudes as they propagate into the ice-shelf cavity. The reinforcement of wave propagation mentioned above, due to ice-shelf flexure, counteracts the effects of dissipation to some degree, and is most effective closer to the ice front, where calving occurs and observed ice-shelf disintegrations initiate. However, in order to excite significant flexural stresses, ocean waves have to have high amplitudes to overcome dissipation. Perhaps the relatively rare occurrence (so far) of very strong storms (e.g. Shillington, 1981) explains why ice-shelf disintegrations are also relatively rare.

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to Caroline Muller for catching an error in the original analysis. I thank Doug MacAyeal and Chief Editor Jo Jacka for help with the manuscript. Valuable comments and constructive criticisms by two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged. This research is supported by US National Science Foundation grants ANT-0838811 and ARC-0934534.

References

Bassis, JN, Fricker, HA, Coleman, R and Minster, J-B (2008) An investigation into the forces that drive ice-shelf rift propagation on the Amery Ice Shelf, East Antarctica. J. Glaciol., 54(184), 1727 (doi: 10.3189/002214308784409116)
Bromirski, PD, Sergienko, OV and MacAyeal, DR (2010) Transoceanic infragravity waves impacting Antarctic ice shelves. Geophys. Res. Lett., 37(L2), L02502 (doi: 10.1029/2009GL041488)
Brunt, KM, Okal, EA and MacAyeal, DR (2011) Antarctic ice-shelf calving triggered by the Honshu (Japan) earthquake and tsunami, March 2011. J. Glaciol., 57(205), 785788 (doi: 10.3189/002214311798043681)
Cathles, LM, Okal, EA and MacAyeal, DR (2009) Seismic observations of sea swell on the floating Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res., 114(F2), F02015 (doi: 10.1029/2007JF000934)
Holdsworth, G and Glynn, JE (1978) Iceberg calving from floating glaciers by a vibrating mechanism. Nature, 274(5670), 464466 (doi: 10.1038/274464a0)
Holdsworth, G and Glynn, JE (1981) A mechanism for the formation of large icebergs. J. Geophys. Res., 86(C4), 32103222 (doi: 10.1029/JC086iC04p03210)
Lescarmontier, L, Legrésy, B, Coleman, R, Perosanz, F, Mayet, C and Testut, L (2012) Vibrations of Mertz Glacier ice tongue, East Antarctica. J. Glaciol., 58(210), 665676 (doi: 10.3189/2012JoG11J089)
MacAyeal, DR and 13 others (2006) Transoceanic wave propagation links iceberg calving margins of Antarctica with storms in tropics and Northern Hemisphere. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(17), L17502 (doi: 10.1029/2006GL027235)
Maxwell, JC (1867) On the dynamical theory of gases. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 157, 4988 (doi: 10.1098/rstl.1867.0004)
NOAA WAVEWATCH IIITM (2010) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service. http://www.oceanweather.com/data/
Reeh, N (1968) On the calving of ice from floating glaciers and ice shelves. J. Glaciol., 7(50), 215232
Sergienko, OV (2010) Elastic response of floating glacier ice to impact of long-period ocean waves. J. Geophys. Res., 115(F4), F04028 (doi: 10.1029/2010JF001721)
Shillington, FA (1981) Low frequency 0.045-Hz swell from the Southern Ocean. Nature, 290(5802), 123125 (doi: 10.1038/290123a0)
Squire, VA (2007) Of ocean waves and sea-ice revisited. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 49(2), 110133 (doi: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2007.04.007)
Stoker, JJ (1957) Water waves: the mathematical theory with applications. Wiley Interscience, New York
Timoshenko, SP and Goodier, JN (1934) Theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York
Vaughan, DG (1995) Tidal flexure at ice shelf margins. J. Geophys. Res., 100(B4), 62136224 (doi: 10.1029/94JB02467)
Vinogradov, OG and Holdsworth, GH (1985) Oscillation of a floating glacier tongue. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 10(3), 263271