Skip to main content Accessibility help

Analysis of as a tool for online science communication

  • Bethan J. Davies (a1) and Neil F. Glasser (a1)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Analysis of as a tool for online science communication
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Analysis of as a tool for online science communication
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Analysis of as a tool for online science communication
      Available formats




Hide All
Allgaier, J, Dunwoody, S, Brossard, D, Lo, Y-Y and Peters, HP (2013) Journalism and social media as means of observing the contexts of science. BioScience, 63(4), 284287 (doi: 10.1525/bio.2013.63.4.8)
Ashlin, A and Ladle, RJ (2006) Environmental science adrift in the Blogosphere. Science, 312(5771), 201 (doi: 10.1126/science.1124197)
Batts, SA, Anthis, NJ and Smith, TC (2008) Advancing science through conversations: bridging the gap between blogs and the Academy. PLOS Biol., 6(9), e60240 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio. 0060240)
Besley, JC and Tanner, AH (2011) What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate. Sci. Commun., 33(2), 239263 (doi: 10.1177/1075547010386972)
Bik, HM and Goldstein, MC (2013) An introduction to social media for scientists. PLoS Biol., 11(4), e1001535 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535)
Bonetta, L (2007) Scientists enter the Blogosphere. Cell, 129(2), 443445 (doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.032)
Bonetta, L (2009) Should you be tweeting? Cell, 139(3), 452453 (doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.017)
Boykoff, MT (2008) Media and scientific communication: a case of climate change. <(Special Publication 305) Geological Society, London
Brewer, PR and Ley, BL (2013) Whose science do you believe? Explaining trust in sources of scientific information about the environment. Sci. Commun., 35(1), 115137 (doi: 10.1177/1075547012441691)
Bubela, T and 23 others (2009) Science communication reconsidered. Nature Biotech., 27(6), 514518 (doi: 10.1038/nbt0609–514)
Butler, D (2005) Science in the web age: joint efforts. Nature, 438(7068), 548549 (doi: 10.1038/438548a)
Corbett, JB and Durfee, JL (2004) Testing public (un)certainty of science: media representations of global warming. Sci. Commun., 26(2), 129151 (doi: 10.1177/1075547004270234)
Darling, E, Shiffman, D, Côté, I and Drew, J (2013) The role of Twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication. Ideas Ecol. Evol., 6(1), 3243 (doi: 10.4033%2Fiee.v6i1.4625)
Flores, C (2003) Measuring the relationship between ICT use and income inequality in Chile. University of Texas Inequality Project, Working Paper 26
Fox, J (2012) Can blogging change how ecologists share ideas? In economics, it already has. Ideas Ecol. Evol., 5(2), 7477 (doi: 10.4033%2Fiee.v5i2.4457)
Francek, M (2013) A compilation and review of over 500 geoscience misconceptions. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 35(1), 3164 (doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.736644)
Goldstein, AM (2009) Blogging evolution. Evol. Educ. Outreach, 2(3), 548559 (doi: 10.1007/s12052–009–0149–9)
Hambrey, M and 6 others (2010) Glaciers – no nonsense science. Geoscientist [Online], 20(6)
Harris, F (2011) Getting geography into the media: understanding the dynamics of academic–media collaboration. Geogr. J., 177(2), 155159 (doi: 10.1111/j.1475–4959.2010.00396.x)
Horrigan, J (2006) The internet as a resource for news and information about science. Pew Research Internet Project. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC
Kellstedt, PM, Zahran, S and Vedlitz, A (2008) Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Anal., 28(1), 113126 (doi: 10.1111/j.1539–6924.2008.01010.x)
Kouper, I (2010) Science blogs and public engagement with science: practices, challenges, and opportunities. J. Sci. Commun., 9(1), 26/02/2010
Maddrell, A (2010) Academic geography as terra incognita: lessons from the ‘expedition debate’ and another border to cross. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 35(2), 149153 (doi: 10.1111/j.1475–5661.2009.00372.x)
McComas, KA, Arvai, J and Besley, JC (2009) Linking public participation and decision making through risk communication. In Heath RL and O’Hair HD eds. Handbook of risk and crisis communication. Routledge, New York, 364385
Miller, JD (1986) Reaching the attentive and interested public for science. In Friedman SM, Dunwoody S and Rogers CL eds. Scientists and journalists: reporting science and news. Free Press, New York, 5569
National Science Board (2012) Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA
Natural Environment Research Council (2011) Engaging the public with your research. Natural Environment Research Council, Swindon
Nisbet, MC and Scheufele, DA (2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am. J. Bot., 96(10), 17671778 (doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900041)
Oppenheimer, M (2011) What roles can scientists play in public discourse? Eos, 92(16), 133134 (doi: 10.1029/2011EO160001)
Peters, HP and 6 others (2008a) Interactions with the mass media. Science, 321(5886), 204205 (doi: 10.1126/science.1157780)
Peters, HP and 6 others (2008b) Science–media interface: it’s time to reconsider. Sci. Commun., 30(2), 266276 (doi: 10.1177/1075547008324809)
Royal Society (2008) Factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. The Royal Society, London
Shema, H, Bar-llan, J and Thelwall, M (2012) Research blogs and the discussion of scholarly information. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e35869 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035869)
Smith, B and 7 others (2013) COMPASS: navigating the rules of scientific engagement. PLoS Biol., 11(4), e1001552 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001552)
Somerville, RCJ and Hassol, SJ (2011) Communicating the science of climate change. Phys. Today, 64(10), 4863 (doi: 10.1063/PT.3.1296)
Stewart, IS and Nield, T (2013) Earth stories: context and narrative in the communication of popular geoscience. Proc. Geol. Assoc., 124(4), 699712 (doi: 10.1016/j.pgeola.2012.08.008)
Warren, DR, Weiss, MS, Wolfe, DW, Friedlander, B and Lewenstein, B (2007) Lessons from science communication training. Science, 316(5828), 1122 (doi: 10.1126/science.316.5828.1122b)
Wilkins, JS (2008) The roles, reasons and restrictions of science blogs. Trends Ecol. Evol., 23(8), 411413 (doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.05.004)
Xin, S, Pepe, A and Bollen, J (2012) How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: article downloads, Twitter mentions, and citations. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e47523 (doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047523)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed