Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T19:57:19.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Translation: A vehicle for change? Evidence from Pennsylvania German

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Marion Lois Huffines
Marion Lois Huffines
Affiliation:
Bucknell UniversityLewisburg, PA 17837
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The long-term practice of translating within a social context where both a dominant and receding language are spoken promotes linguistic convergence: speakers alter grammatical structures of the receding language to match the structures of the dominant language. During individual acts of translating, speakers often resort to two enabling strategies: the speaker attempts structures which are no longer regularly used in the community and thereby promotes the maintenance of conservative norms; or the speaker uses the language being translated as a model and thereby contributes toward convergence. In both cases, translation biases language forms and produces an inaccurate picture of the language skills current in the speech community. Evidence is provided from translated and free discourse in two Pennsylvania German communities: among nonsectarians, where Pennsylvania German is dying, and among Amish and Men-nonite sectarians, where Pennsylvania German continues to be used for daily discourse.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , July 1991 , pp. 175 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CITED

Bach, Adolf. 1965. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. 8th ed.Heidelberg: Quelle.Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung. Vol. 4. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Buffington, Albert F. and Barba, Preston A.. 1965. A Pennsylvania German grammar. Allentown, PA: Schlechter.Google Scholar
Ebert, Robert Peter. 1986. Historische Syntax des Deutschen II: 1300–1750. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Frey, J. William. 1981. A simple grammar of Pennsylvania German. Lancaster, PA: Brookshire Publications. Rpt. of ed. of 1942 with a new preface by C. Richard Beam.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Glenn G. 1965. “Dative versus accusative in the dialects of central Texas.” Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 32:288–296.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. and Wilson, Robert. 1971. “Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian border in India.” Pidginization and creolization of languages. Ed. Hymes, Dell. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Pp. 151–167.Google Scholar
Haag, Earl C. 1982. A Pennsylvania German reader and grammar. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois. 1989. “Case usage among the Pennsylvania German sectarians and nonsectarians.” Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death. Ed. Dorian, Nancy C.. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Pp. 211–226.Google Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois. 1988. “Lexical borrowing and linguistic convergence in Pennsylvania German.” Yearbook for German-American studies 23:59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois. 1986. “The function of aspect in Pennsylvania German and the impact of English.” Yearbook for German-American studies 21:137–154.Google Scholar
Kehr, Kurt. 1979. “‘Deutsche’ Dialekte in Virginia und West Virginia (U.S.A.).” Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 46:289–319.Google Scholar
Lewis, Brian A. 1973. “Swiss German in Wisconsin: The impact of English.” American speech 48:211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Mark L. 1988. Bilingualism and syntactic change in Pennsylvania German. Unpublished diss., Cornell University.Google Scholar
Salmons, Joseph C. 1983. “Issues in Texas German language maintenance and shift.” Monatshefte 75:187–196.Google Scholar
Scaglione, Aldo. 1981. The theory of German word order from the Renaissance to the present. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey and Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Waterman, John T. 1966. A history of the German language. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar