Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Periphrastic Progressive Constructions in Dutch and Afrikaans: A Contrastive Analysis

  • Adri Breed (a1), Frank Brisard (a2) and Ben Verhoeven (a2)

Abstract

Given the common ancestry of Dutch and Afrikaans, it is not surprising that they use similar periphrastic constructions to express progressive meaning: aan het (Dutch) and aan die/’t (Afrikaans) lit. ‘at the’; bezig met/(om) te (Dutch) lit. ‘busy with/to’ and besig om te lit. ‘busy to’ (Afrikaans); and so-called cardinal posture verb constructions (zitten/sit ‘sit’, staan ‘stand’, liggen/lê ‘lie’ and lopen/loop ‘walk’), CPV te (‘to’ Dutch) and CPV en (‘and’ Afrikaans). However, these cognate constructions have grammaticalized to different extents. To assess the exact nature of these differences, we analyzed the constructions with respect to overall frequency, collocational range, and transitivity (compatibility with transitive predicates and passivizability). We used two corpora that are equal in size (both about 57 million words) and contain roughly the same types of written text. It turns out that the use of periphrastic progressives is generally more widespread in Afrikaans than in Dutch. As far as grammaticalization is concerned, we found that the Afrikaans aan die- and CPV-constructions, as well as the Dutch bezig- and CPV-constructions, are semantically restricted. In addition, only the Afrikaans besig- and CPV en-constructions allow passivization, which is remarkable for such periphrastic expressions. *

Copyright

Corresponding author

School of Languages, Box 395, Private bag X6001, Potchefstroom Campus, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa [adri.breed@nwu.ac.za]
(CLiPS: Computational Linguistics & Psycholinguistics), Department of Linguistics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000 Antwerpen, Belgium, [frank.brisard@uantwerpen.be], [ben.verhoeven@uantwerpen.be]

References

Hide All
Abraham, Werner. 2008. On the logic of generalizations about cross-linguistic aspect-modality links. Modality–aspect interfaces: Implications and typological solutions, ed. by Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth, 313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Anthonissen, Lynn, De Wit, Astrid, & Mortelmans, Tanja. 2016. Aspect meets modality: A semantic analysis of the German ‘am V sein’ construction. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28. 130.
BarÐdal, Jóhanna. 2013. Construction-based historical-comparative reconstruction. Oxford handbook of construction grammar, ed. by Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme, 438457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco, Ebert, Karen H., & de Groot, Casper. 2000. The progressive in Europe. Dahl 2000, 517558.
Booij, Geert. 2004. De aan het infinitief-constructie in het Nederlands. Taeldeman man van de taal, schatbewaarder van de taal, ed. by De Caluwe, Johan, De Schutter, Georges, Devos, Magda, & van Keymeulen, Jacques, 97106. Ghent: Academia Press.
Booij, Geert. 2008. Constructional idioms as products of linguistic change: The aan het construction in Dutch. Constructions and language change, ed. by Bergs, Alexander & Diewald, Gabrielle, 81106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Botha, Theunis, Ponelis, Fritz, Combrink, Johan, & Odendal, Francois (eds.). 1989. Afrikaanse literatuurgeskiedenis. Pretoria: Academica.
Breed, Adri. 2012. Die grammatikalisering van aspek in Afrikaans: ʼn Semantiese studie van perifrastiese progressiewe konstruksies. Potchefstroom, South Africa: North-West University dissertation.
Breed, Adri. 2017. The subjective use of postural verb in Afrikaans (I): Evolution from progressive to modal. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 52. 121.
Breed, Adri, & Brisard, Frank. 2015. Postulêre werkwoorde as progressiewe merkers in Afrikaans en Nederlands. Internationale Neerlandistiek 53. 328.
Breed, Adri, & Van Huyssteen, Gerhard. 2015. Aan die en besig in Afrikaanse progressiwiteitskonstruksies: ’n Korpusondersoek (2). Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 55. 251269.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere, & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Carstens, Wannie. 1989. Norme vir Afrikaans. Pretoria: Academica.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Östen (ed.). 2000. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, Eurotyp 20 (6). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
De Smedt, Tom, & Daelemans, Walter. 2012. Pattern for Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 13. 20312035.
De Wit, Astrid, & Brisard, Frank. 2014. Zero verb marking in Sranan. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 29. 148.
De Wit, Astrid, Patard, Adeline, & Brisard, Frank. 2013. A contrastive analysis of the present progressive in French and English. Studies in Language 37. 846879.
Dekker, Gerrit. 1973. Afrikaanse literatuurgeskiedenis. Cape Town: Nasou.
Ebert, Karen. 2000. Progressive markers in Germanic languages. Dahl 2000, 605654.
Franckel, Jean-Jacques. 1989. Étude de quelques marqueurs aspectuels du français. Geneva: Droz.
Geleyn, Tim. 2010. De progressieve constructies bezig zijn en besig wees: Een contrastief corpusonderzoek Nederlands-Afrikaans. Ghent, Belgium: Universiteit Gent bachelor dissertation.
Geleyn, Tim, & Colleman, Timothy. 2014. De progressieve constructies bezig zijn en bezig wees: Een contrastief corpusondersoek Nederlands—Afrikaans. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 54. 5674.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2010. Corpus, cognition and causative constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goldsmith, John, & Woisetschlaeger, Erich. 1976. The logic of the English progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 7989.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2007. Coll.analysis 3.2a. A script for R to compute perform collostructional analyses.
Gries, Stefan Th., Hampe, Beate, & Schönefeld, Doris. 2005. Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16. 635676.
Gries, Stefan Th., & Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9. 97129.
Haeseryn, Walter, Romijn, Kirsten, Geerts, Guido, de Rooij, Jaap, & van den Toorn, Maarten. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. 2nd revised edn. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff/Wolters Plantyn.
Heine, Bernd. 1990. Grammaticalization as an explanatory parameter. Perspectives on grammaticalization, ed. by Pagliuca, William, 255287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. I, ed. by Traugott, Elizabeth & Heine, Bernd, 1736. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jespersen, Otto. 1931. Modern English grammar on historical principles: Syntax, vol. 3. London: Allen & Unwin.
Kirsner, Robert S. 1985. Iconicity and grammatical meaning. Iconicity in syntax, ed. by Haiman, John, 249270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kirsner, Robert S. 2014. Qualitative-quantitative analyses of Dutch and Afrikaans grammar and lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Krause, Olaf. 1997. Progressiv-Konstruktionen im Deutschen im Vergleich mit dem Niederländischen, Englischen und Italienischen. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 50. 4882.
Kuteva, Tania A. 1999. On ‘sit’/’stand’/’lie’ auxiliation. Linguistics 37. 191213.
Langacker, Ronald. 1990. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Leiss, Elisabeth. 2000. Verbalaspekt und die Herausbildung epistemischer Modalverben. Germanistische Linguistik 154. 6383.
Lemmens, Maarten. 2003. The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs. The linguistics of sitting, standing and lying, ed. by Newman, John, 103139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lemmens, Maarten. 2005. Aspectual posture verb constructions in Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 17. 183217.
Lemmens, Maarten. 2008. Een contrastieve analyse van progressiefconstructies in het Nederlands, het Engels en het Zweeds. Paper presented at the IVN-colloquium held in Antwerp, August 27–31, 2008.
Lemmens, Maarten. 2015. Zit je te denken of ben je aan het piekeren? Persistentie in het synchrone gebruik van de PREP- en POS-progressiefconstructies in het Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde 20. 536.
Ljung, Magnus. 1980. Reflections on the English progressive. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Los, Bettelou, Blom, Corrien, Booij, Geert, Elenbaas, Marion, & van Kemenade, Ans. 2012. Morphosyntactic change: A comparative study of particles and prefixes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mesthrie, Rajend (ed.). 1995. Language and social history: Studies in South African sociolinguistics. Cape Town: David Philip.
Mesthrie, Rajend. 2002. Endogeny versus contact revisited: Aspectual “busy” in South African English. Language Sciences 24. 345358.
Mortier, Liesbeth. 2008. An analysis of progressive aspect in French and Dutch in terms of variation and specialization. Languages in Contrast 8. 120.
Noord, Gertjan van, Bouma, Gosse, Van Eynde, Frank, de Kok, Daniël, van der Linde, Jelmer, Schuurman, Ineke, Tjong Kim Sang, Erik, & Vandeghinste, Vincent. 2013. Large scale syntactic annotation of written Dutch: Lassy. Essential speech and language technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programme, ed. by Spyns, Peter & Odijk, Jan, 147164. Heidelberg: Springer. Available at http://tst-centrale.org/nl/tst-materialen/corpora/lassy-groot-corpus-detail.
Pedersen, Ted. 1996. Fishing for exactness. Proceedings of the South Central SAS User’s Group Conference (SCSUG-96), 188200. Austin, TX: South-Central SAS Users Group.
Ponelis, Fritz. 1979. Afrikaanse sintaksis. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
Raidt, Edith. 1972. Afrikaans en sy Europese verlede. Cape Town: Nasou.
Sebba, Mark. 1997. Contact languages: Pidgins and creoles. London: Macmillan.
Smith, Carlota. 1997. The parameter of aspect. 2nd edn. London: Kluwer Academic.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, & Gries, Stefan Th.. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8. 209243.
Taalkommissie van die Suid-Afrikaanse Akademie vir Wetenskap en Kuns. 2011. Taalkommissiekorpus 1.1. Potchefstroom: CTexT Corpus.
Van Pottelberghe, Jeroen. 2002. Nederlandse progressiefconstructies met werkwoorden van lichaam. Nederlandse Taalkunde 7. 142174.

Keywords

Periphrastic Progressive Constructions in Dutch and Afrikaans: A Contrastive Analysis

  • Adri Breed (a1), Frank Brisard (a2) and Ben Verhoeven (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed