Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T08:25:15.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on the Etymologies of English big and Gothic ga-

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Garry W. Davis
Garry W. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Foreign Languages and LinguisticsThe University of Wisconsin, MilwaukeeP.O. Box 413Milwaukee, WI 53201–0413 [gdavis@csd.uwm.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the Northwest Germanic period, *ɣaβiɣs ‘rich’ (Go. gabigs / gabeigs ‘rich’ < giban ‘to give’) and related forms (Go. gabigjan ‘to make rich’, gabignan ‘to be rich’) were reanalyzed as consisting of the prefix *ɣa- + root. This reanalysis was triggered by the prevailing Germanic stress pattern (indicated where necessary by a raised tick '), since *ɣaβiɣs was stressed on the first syllable of the root (thus *'ɣaβiɣs). while nominal and adjectival compounds that consisted of *ɣa- + root ('ga-qumps ‘assembly’, 'ga-fulgins ‘hidden’, 'ga-hails ‘hale’) were stressed on the prefix. Thus, an extrapolated root form *ɣiγ- > *biγ- was created that then existed parallel to *γaβiγs in Northwest Germanic. The newly created form *biγs survived and developed into ME big(ge) ‘strong, sturdy’ (> Eng. big), while OE gifig, ON g˛fugr ‘noble’, and related forms in Old High German and Gothic are reflexes of *ɣaβiɣs.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Spring 2000 , pp. 41 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Germanic Linguistics 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnhart, Robert K. (ed.). 1988. The Barnhart dictionary of etymology. New York: Wilson.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, Ernst. 1870. Die Partikel ga- als Hilfsmittel bei der gothischen Conjugation. Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie 2.158–166.Google Scholar
Bennett, William. 1968. The accentuation of Gothic ga-. Germanic studies in honor of Edward Henry Sehrt, ed. by Raven, Frithjof A., Legner, Wolfram Karl, and King, James C., 54–60. (Miami linguistics series, 1.) Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1906. Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen.Vol. 2. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.Google Scholar
Buck, Charles Darling. 1949. A dictionary of Indo-European synomyms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, and Pagliuca, William. 1985. Crosslinguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. Historical semantics, historical word formation, ed. by Fisiak, Jacek, 59–83. (Trends in linguistics, studies and monographs, 29.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, Jan. 1977. Altnordisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Hoad, T. F. 1986. The concise Oxford dictionary of English etymology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1899. Nominale Stammbildungslehre der altgermanischen Dialekte. 2nd edn.Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Krahe, Hans, and Meid, Wolfgang. 1967. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft. Vol. III. Wortbildungslehre. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krause, Wolfgang. 1968. Handbuch des Gotischen. 3rd edn.Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Albert. 1979. Anatomy of the verb: The Gothic verb as a model for a unified theory of aspect, actional types, and verbal velocity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markey, Thomas L. 1990. Gift, payment, and reward revisited. When worlds collide: Indo-European and Pre-Indo-Europeans, ed. by Markey, Thomas L. and Greppin, John A. C., 345–362. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Pollak, Hans. 1971. Über ga- beim gotischen Verb. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 93.1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokosch, Eduard. 1938. A comparative Germanic grammar. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Rice, Allan Lake. 1932. Gothic prepositional compounds in their relations to their Greek originals. (Language dissertation, 11.) Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streitberg, Wilhelm. 1891. Perfective und imperfective Actionsart im Germanischen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 15.70–177.Google Scholar
Streitberg, Wilhelm. 1920. Gotisches Elementarbuch. 5th and 6th edns.Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Streitberg, Wilhelm. 1974. Urgermanische Grammatik. 4th edn.Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Voyles, Joseph B. 1992. Early Germanic grammar: Pre-, Proto-, and Post-Germanic languages. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, Kazuhiko. 1980. A study of the Gothic preverb ga-. Gengo-Kenkyu: Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan 78.85–113.Google Scholar