Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of French Language Studies
  4. Volume 7
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 7 - September 1997

Contents

Page 3 of 3

Reviews

Editorial note

  • Editorial Note

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 October 2008, p. 239
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Erratum

  • Erratum

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 October 2008, p. 125
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • The last Paragraph of David Nott's review of Doble and Fawcett's Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, publised in JFLS 6: 245–247, should have appeared as follows, containing the emboldened section:

    Pressures for change in language teaching are increasingly resources-driven (shortage or high cost of human resources, and promotion of electronic resources), whereas, as many of these papers amply demonstrate, the crucial requirements for language learners are those of personal and cultural competence, which cannot be acquired in the language laboratory of the 1960s or the CALL laboratory of the 1990s ‘pareillement au savoir qui ne mène pas forcément au savoir-faire, le technologie n'aboutit pas à la parole. Un didacticiel n'exerce pas de compétence de sens’ (Namenwirth, 1994: 277); ‘In the case of adults learning an advanced L2, conceptualising the message may be a process which is not dependent on the foreign language’ (Towell, p. 17).

    The Editors sincerely apologies for the omission.

Front matter

  • JFL volume 7 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 October 2008, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • JFL volume 7 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 October 2008, pp. b1-b9
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Front matter

  • JFL volume 7 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 October 2008, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Back matter

  • JFL volume 7 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 October 2008, pp. b1-b5
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 3 of 3