Skip to main content Accessibility help

Prenominal bon and bonne in French liaison and enchaînement: An acoustic description

  • Adam F. McBride (a1)


This article investigates the treatment of oronasal vowel /ↄ̃/ of the prenominal adjective bon (/bↄ̃/) in liaison, as produced by 19 speakers of Northern Metropolitan French. The oronasal vowel of this word has traditionally been identified as a denasalized vowel in liaison, which, when paired with the liaison consonant [n], is typically understood to be produced identically to the feminine form of the adjective bonne (/bↄn/). To verify this supposition, the adjective pair bon/bonne is produced in various contexts and word sequences by each speaker in a series of reading tasks. Six acoustic measures (i.e., A1−P0, A3−P0, center of gravity, F1 bandwidth, F2 and vowel duration) are taken for each token and the resulting data are analysed in a series of regression models. A brief acoustic description is given for the vowel /ↄ̃/ both in and out of liaison, and comparison is made between bon in liaison and the feminine bonne in prevocalic position (e.g., bon ami vs. bonne amie). Analyses indicate that 15 of the 19 speakers seem to produce bon in liaison distinctly from non-liaison bon, but not distinctly from pre-vocalic bonne, which may support suppletive analyses of adjectives in liaison.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Boersma, P. and Weenink, P. (2017). Praat (Version 6.0.24) [Software]. URL:
Bybee, J. (1998). The Emergent Lexicon. CLS 34: The Panels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 421435.
Bybee, J. (2001). Frequency effects on French liaison. Typological Studies in Language, 45: 337360.
Bybee, J. (2005). La liaison: Effets de fréquence et constructions. Languages, 158: 2437.
Carignan, C. (2013). When nasal is more than nasal: The oral articulation of nasal vowels in two dialects of French. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Carignan, C. (2014). An acoustic and articulatory examination of the ‘oral’ in ‘nasal’: The oral articulations of French nasal vowels are not arbitrary. Journal of Phonetics, 46: 2333.
Carignan, C., Shosted, R., Fu, M., Liang, Z.-P. and Sutton, B. (2015). A real-time MRI investigation of the role of lingual and pharyngeal articulation in the production of the nasal vowel system of French. Journal of Phonetics, 50: 3451.
Chen, M. Y. (1995). Acoustic parameters of nasalized vowels in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98(5): 24432453.
Chen, M. Y. (1997). Acoustic correlates of English and French nasalized vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(4): 23602370.
Côté, M. H. (2005). Le statut lexical des consonnes de liaison. Langages, 2: 6678.
Côté, M.-H. (2011). French Liaison. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 5: 26852710. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Delattre, P. (1947/1966). La liaison en français, tendences et classification. In Delattre, P. (ed.), Studies in French and comparative phonetics: Selected papers in French and English. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 3954.
Delattre, P. (1968). Divergences entre nasalités vocalique et consonantique en français. Word, 24(1–3): 6472.
Delattre, P. and Monnot, M. (1968). The role of duration in the identification of French nasal vowels. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 6(3): 267288.
Delvaux, V. (2009). Perception du contraste de nasalité vocalique en Français. Journal of French Language Studies, 19(1): 2559.
Delvaux, V., Demolin, D., Harmegnies, B., and Soquet, A. (2008). The aerodynamics of nasalization in French. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4): 578606.
Delvaux, V., Huet, K., Piccaluga, M., and Harmegnies, B. (2012). Inter-gestural timing in French nasal vowels: A comparative study of (liëge, tournai) northern French vs. (marseille, toulouse) southern French. In Interspeech 2012, 26832685.
Durand, J. and Lyche, C. (2008). French liaison in the light of corpus data. Journal of French Language Studies, 18(1): 3366.
Fouché, P. (1959). Traité de la prononciation française, 2nd edn. Paris: Klincksieck.
Glass, J. R. and Zue, V. W. (1985). Detection of nasalized vowels in American English. In Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE International Conference on ICASSP '85, 10: 1569–1572.
Gordon, M. and Ladefoged, P. (2001). Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics, 29(4): 383406.
Hattori, S., Yamamoto, K. and Fujimura, O. (1958). Nasalization of vowels in relation to nasals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30(4): 267274.
Hawkins, S. and Stevens, K. N. (1985). Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the non‐nasal–nasal distinction for vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77(4): 15601575.
Henning, R. and Jongman, A. (2011). Phonetics: Transcription, production, acoustics, and perception. Hoboken: Wiley.
Jakubíček, M., Kilgarriff, A., Kovář, V., Rychlý, P. and Suchomel, V. (2013, July). The TenTen corpus family. In 7th International Corpus Linguistics Conference CL (pp. 125–127).
Kiefte, M. and Kluender, K. R. (2005). The relative importance of spectral tilt in monophthongs and diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117: 13951404.
Lennes, M. (2002). Draw spectrum from selection [Praat script]. URL:∼lennes/praat-scripts/public/draw_spectrum_from_selection.praat
Macmillan, N. A., Kingston, J., Thorburn, R., Dickey, L. W. and Bartels, C. (1999). Integrality of nasalization and F1. II. Basic sensitivity and phonetic labeling measure distinct sensory and decision-rule interactions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106: 29132932.
Maeda, S. (1982). Acoustic correlates of vowel nasalization: A simulation study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72: S102.
Maeda, S. (1993). Acoustics of vowel nasalization and articulatory shifts in French nasal vowels. Phonetics and Phonology, 5: 147167.
Morin, Y. C. (1986). On the morphologization of word-final consonant deletion in French. In: Andersen, H. (ed), Sandhi phenomena in the langues of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 176210.
Pruthi, T. and Espy-Wilson, C. Y. (2007, August). Acoustic parameters for the automatic detection of vowel nasalization. Interspeech (pp. 19251928).
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 1.0.136). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL:
Sampson, R. (2001). Liaison, nasal vowels and productivity. Journal of French Language Studies, 11(2): 241258.
Schwartz, M. F. (1968). The acoustics of normal and nasal vowel production. The Cleft Palate Journal, 5(2): 125140.
Selkirk, E. (1974). French liaison and the X¯ notation. Linguistic Inquiry, 5(4): 573590.
Shosted, R., Carignan, C. and Rong, P. (2012). Managing the distinctiveness of phonemic nasal vowels: Articulatory evidence from Hindi. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(1): 455465.
Steriade, D. (1999). Lexical conservatism in French adjectival liaison. In: Authier, J.-M., Bullock, B. E., and Reed, L. A. (eds), Formal perspectives on Romance linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 243270.
Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stevens, K. N., Andrede, A., and Viana, M. C. (1987). Perception of vowel nasalization in VC contexts: A cross-language study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82.S1: S119.
Styler, W. (2015). On the acoustical and perceptual features of vowel nasality. PhD thesis, University of Colorado.
Tranel, B. (1990). On suppletion and French liaison. Probus, 2(2): 169208.

Prenominal bon and bonne in French liaison and enchaînement: An acoustic description

  • Adam F. McBride (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.