Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:44:08.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methodological considerations when piloting an interview protocol: the example of Syrian asylum seekers in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2020

Inès Saddour
Inès Saddour*
Affiliation:
Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès
*
Email: ines.saddour@univ-tlse2.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses some methodological issues that arose when analysing data collected in a pilot study of the SOFRA project. We aimed at piloting a semi-structured interview protocol designed to collect qualitative data with nine Syrian asylum seekers and refugees studying French at university, using an interview schedule that targeted, among other things, information about learners’ interaction opportunities and attitudes about their new environment and learning experiences. Analysing the manners in which the interviewer asked the questions and coped with comprehension difficulties, as well as the way the interviewees responded to the questions, led to the identification of a number of problems that are partly related to question type and wording. The article concludes with a reflection on how to elicit relevant answers during a semi-structured interview with migrant learners.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 30 , Issue 2: Methodological challenges in SLA: A focus on French , July 2020 , pp. 211 - 238
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adami, H., and André, V. (2015). Corpus et apprentissage du Français Langue d’Intégration (FLI). LINX: 68–69, 135–158.Google Scholar
Bell, J. (2005). Doing your own Research. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bremer, K., Broeder, P., Roberts, C., Simonot, M. and Vasseur, M.-T. (1993). Ways of achieving understanding. In: Perdue, C. (ed.), Adult Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, Volume II: The Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–195.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (2003). Data collection in SLA research. In: The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 762–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approach. California: Sage.Google Scholar
Darvin, R. and Norton, B. (2015). Identity and a model of investment in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Early, M. and Norton, B. (2012). Language learner stories and imagined identities. Narrative Inquiry, 22(1): 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, A. and Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA Research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3): 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Individual differences in second language achievement: focus on attitudes and motivation. In: Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Arnold, pp. 39–61.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., Young, R. F., Ortega, L., Bigelow, M., DeKeyser, R., Ellis, N. C., Lantolf, J. P., Mackey, A. and Talmy, S. (2014). Bridging the gap: cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3): 361–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. and Perdue, C. (1992). Utterance Structure: Developing Grammars Again. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (1999). Second culture acquisition. In: Hinkel, E. (ed.), Culture in Second Language Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 28–46.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. and Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. In: VanPatten, B. and Williams, J. (eds), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum, pp. 201–224.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., Thorne, S. L. and Poehner, M. E. (2015). Sociocultural theory and second language development. In: van Patten, B. and Williams, J. (eds), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, pp. 207–226.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: forms and functions of teachers. In: Classroom Oriented Research in Second Languages. New York: Newbury House, pp. 268–285.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., and Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mann, C. M., and Fazil, Q. (2006). Mental illness in asylum seekers and refugees. Primary Care Mental Health: 4, 57–66.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Miller, E. R. and Kubota, R. (2013). Second language identity construction. In: Herschensohn, J. and Young-Scholten, M. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 230–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. and Gao, Y. (2008). Identity, investiment, and Chinese learners of English. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication: 18(1), 109–120.Google Scholar
Norton, B. and Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learnbing, and social change. Language Teaching: 44(4), 412–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. Tesol Quarterly, 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oroujlou, N. and Vahedi, M. (2011). Motivation, attitude, and language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences: 29, 994–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2001). How am I to become a woman in an American vein?: Transformations of gender performance in second language learning. In: Blackledge, A., Piller, I. and Teutsch-Dwyer, M. (eds), Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 133–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perdue, C. (ed.). (1993a). Adult Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, Volume I, Field Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. (ed.). (1993b). Adult Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, Volume II, The Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Romelaer, P. (2005). Chapitre 4. L’entretien de recherche. In: Roussel, P. and Wacheux, F. (eds), Management des Ressources Humaines: Méthodes de Recherche en Sciences Humaines et Sociales. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck Supérieur, pp. 101–137.Google Scholar
Sourisseau, J. (2018). Bilan du programme DILAMI, Dispositif Langues Accueil Migrants 2017-2018. L’Université Fédérale de Toulouse. https://www.univ-toulouse.fr/sites/default/files/2019-10/Bilan-qualitatif-Dilami-2017-2018_UFTMP_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. (2007). Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research – 1997-2007. The Modern Language Journal, 91(Focus Issue): 837–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2003). Motivation as a socially mediated process. In: Little, D., Ridley, J. and Ushioda, E. (eds), Learner autonomy in theforeign language classroom: teacher, learner, curriculum and assessment. Dublin: Authentik Language Learning Resources, pp. 90–102.Google Scholar
Ushioda, E. and Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Beyond Global English: Motivation to learn languages in a multicultural world (Introduction to the special issue). Modern Language Journal, 101(3): 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hout, R. and Strömqvist, S. (1993). Measuring Language Acquisition: The influence of socio-biographical factors. In: Perdue, C. (ed.), Adult Language Acquisition, Volume I: Field Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–172.Google Scholar
van Tubergen, F. (2010). Determinants of seond language proficiency among refugees in the Netherlands. Social Forces, 89(2): 515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Véronique, G. D. (2013). Socialization. In: Herschensohn, J. and Young-Scholten, M. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vion, R. (2000). Compréhension et comportement communicatif. In: Giacomi, A., Stoffel, H. and Véronique, D. (eds), Appropriation du français par des marocains arabophones à Marseille : Bilan d’une recherche. Publications de l’Université de Provence, pp. 273–296.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Young-Scholten, M. (2013). Low-educated immigrants and the social relevance of second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 29(4): 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeinivand, T., Azizifar, A. and Gowhary, H. (2015). The relationship between attitude and speaking proficiency of Iranian EFL learners: The case of Darrehshehr city. Pocedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199: 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar