Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T14:32:30.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature-field structure within atmospheric buoyant thermals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

R. G. Bat
Affiliation:
TRW Space and Defense Systems Group, Redondo Beach. CA 90278
R. A. Bigoni
Affiliation:
TRW Space and Defense Systems Group, Redondo Beach. CA 90278 Present address: Mission Research Corporation, 735 State Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93102.
D. J. Rowland
Affiliation:
TRW Space and Defense Systems Group, Redondo Beach. CA 90278

Abstract

Using stationary rakes of hot-wire anemometer probes, a series of temperature measurements have been conducted within rising buoyant thermals created by detonation of large-diameter gas-filled balloons. These atmospheric detonation simulation tests were performed at the SANDIA Laboratories Aerial Cable Test Facility, Kirtland AFB, during the late fall of 1973. All measurements were performed after pressure equilibrium (t > 1 s) but prior to completion of the toroid formation process and within the time required (t > 4 s) for the fireball to rise one diameter.

Based on an extensive processing of measured data for two detonation events, unique results describing the mean flow field and turbulent structure statistics for the early-time large-scale buoyant thermal have been determined. Final results include: mean-velocity and temperature data; temperature and temperature gradient intensities; space, auto- and ‘eddy-lifetime’ correlation scales; power-spectral densities; probability density distributions and approximate microscale data.

The present temperature data illustrate that the early-time rising fireball is characterized by a highly intermittent irregular top or cap, a constant (high-) temperature core and a thermal wake exhibiting a linear decay in mean temperature. Mean convection velocities for the fireball wake were measured to be approximately twice as large as fireball cap velocities (13.1 m/s). Maximum fireball temperatures (1100 °C) were in good agreement with peak brightness-temperature data determined from an independent IR measurements experiment. Core leading-edge mean-temperature gradients compare favourably with predictions (10 °C/cm) whereas trailing-edge gradients (0.4 °C/cm) are smaller than predicted results (3 °C/cm).

Normalized temperature intensities at the fireball top and within the thermal wake were substantial (≈ 0.6) in contrast with quiescent fireball core levels (0.1). Moving-frame autocorrelation times (‘eddy lifetimes’, 0.17 + 0.04 s) were approximately four times larger than measured autocorrelation times. This result illustrates that the early-time fireball eddy structure is highly persistent, a finding which tends to substantiate those radar models for large-scale fireballs which postulate relatively slow ‘smearing’ of early-time electron density gradients. Wake integral scales, determined from vertical space correlation data, were approximately 5% of the fireball mean radius. Probability density distributions for the fireball thermal wake were ‘spiky’ in nature, with some evidence of bimodal behaviour, and slightly skewed to the negative side of their normalized values. Normalized spectra data, in general, follow a − &5/3; falloff behaviour for several decades in spectral power. The noted large ‘spread’ in the inertial subrange is consistent with measured turbulence Reynolds numbers (2000) and with the large-scale fully developed turbulent structure for the GEST fireballs (ReD = 3 × 107). Wake microscale data, estimated from temperature and temperature-gradient intensity data and the isotropic turbulence assumption, varied from 2 to 4 ern and were in favourable agreement with predicted microscale magnitudes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1984 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batt, R. G. 1976 Hot wire measurements of temperature field structure within GEST fireballs. DNA 3936T.Google Scholar
Bendat, J. S. & Piersol, A. G. 1971 Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. Wiley Interscience.
Bigoni, R. A. & Matuska, D. A. 1974 Preliminary report on project gas explosive simulation technique. AFWL TR-74-252.Google Scholar
Blackman, R. G. & Tukey, J. W. 1958 The Measurement of Power Spectra. Dover.
Bradshaw, P. 1971 An Introduction to Turbulence and Its Measurement. Pergamon.
Corrsin, S. 1949 Extended applications of the hot-wire anemometer. NACA TN 1964.Google Scholar
Hinze, J. O. 1959 Turbulence. McGraw-Hill.
Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1954 Turbulence measurements - hot wire method. In Physical Measurements in Gas Dynamics and Combustion, pp. 213276. Princeton University Press.
Knapp, W. S. & Schwartz, L. 1975 Aids for the study of electromagnetic blackout. DNA 3499H.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Dover.
Lin, S. C., Tsang, T. & Wang, C. P. 1972 Temperature field structure in strongly heated buoyant thermals. Phys. Fluids 15, 2118.Google Scholar
Mantrom, D. W. & Haigh, W. W. 1974 Fireball entrainment study. DNA 3248F.Google Scholar
Scorer, R. S. 1957 Experiments on convection of isolated masses of buoyant fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 583.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1950 The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion. II. The atomic explosion of 1945. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 201, 175.Google Scholar
Tsang, L. C. H. 1974 Initial formation geometry and evolution of temperature field in buoyant thermals. MSE thesis, University of California, San Diego.
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.
Woodward, B. 1959 The motion in and around isolated thermals. Q. J.R. Meteor. Soc. 85, 44.Google Scholar