Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:42:25.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spreading of the interface at the top of a slightly polydisperse sedimenting suspension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

Robert H. Davis  and
Mark A. Hassen
Robert H. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0424, USA
Mark A. Hassen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0424, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interface at the top of a dilute sedimenting suspension of small particles which are not identical does not remain sharp but instead becomes increasingly diffuse as the sedimentation proceeds. For more concentrated suspensions, the self-sharpening effect of hindered settling leads to a considerable reduction in the observed spreading of the sedimenting interface. In order to quantify this spreading, a light extinction technique was used to measure the concentration profile in the interface of a suspension of particles with a small spread of sizes as it fell past a thin sheet of light. A particle volume-fraction range of 0.002 ≤ Φ0 ≤ 0.15 was examined, and each fluid-particle system had a particle Reynolds number less than 10−3 and a Péclet number greater than 107 so that inertia and colloidal effects were negligible. Calculations of the spreading arising from the small degree of polydispersity in particle sizes and the self-sharpening effect are presented. Surprisingly, the measured vertical thickness of the interface was found to be several times that predicted from this theory.

It is proposed that the observed spreading may be attributed to hydrodynamic interactions between particles that lead to fluctuations in particle settling velocities about the mean. An analysis of the data shows that the measured interface thickness, after subtracting off that predicted from polydispersity and self-sharpening, increases approximately with the square root of the settling distance and may therefore be described as a diffusion process, termed ‘self-induced hydrodynamic diffusion’. By sealing the hydrodynamic diffusivity as $D = au_{\frac{1}{2}}\hat{D}(\Phi_0)$, where u½ is the median hindered settling velocity, a is the median particle radius, and Φ0 is the volume fraction of particles well below the interface, an approximate analysis of the data was used to infer that the dimensionless scaled diffusion coefficient, $\hat{D}$, is between 1 and 2 for the smaller particle volume fractions examined, increases very rapidly with increasing concentration to a value between 10 and 15 for particle concentrations of a few percent by volume, and then levels off or declines slightly as the particle concentration is increased further.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 196 , November 1988 , pp. 107 - 134
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnea, E. & Mizrahi, J. 1973 A generalized approach to the fluid dynamics of particulate systems: Part 1. General correlation for fluidization and sedimentation in solid multiparticle systems. Chem. Engng J. 5, 171–189.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1982 Sedimentation in a dilute polydisperse system of interacting spheres. Part 1. General theory. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 379–408.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Janse van Rensberg, R. W. 1986 Structure formation in bidisperse sedimentation. J. Fluid Mech. 166, 379–407.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Wen, C. S. 1982 Sedimentation in a dilute polydisperse system of interacting spheres. Part 2. Numerical results. J. Fluid Mech. 124, 495–528.Google Scholar
Davis, R. H. & Acrivos, A. 1985 Sedimentation of noncolloidal particles at low Reynolds numbers. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 17, 91–118.Google Scholar
Davis, R. H. & Birdsell, K. H. 1988 Hindered settling of semi-dilute monodisperse and polydisperse suspensions. AlChE J. 34, 123–129.Google Scholar
Davis, R. H., Herbolzheimer, E. & Acrivos, A. 1982 The sedimentation of polydisperse suspensions in vessels having inclined walls. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 8, 571–585.Google Scholar
Durlofsky, L., Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1987 Dynamic simulation of hydrodynamically interacting spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 21–49.Google Scholar
Eckstein, E. C., Bailey, D. G. & Shapiro, A. H. 1977 Self-diffusion of particles in shear flow of a suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 191–208.Google Scholar
Greenspan, H. P. & Ungarish, M. 1982 On hindered settling of particles of different sizes. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 8, 587–604.Google Scholar
Ham, J. M. & Momsy, G. M. 1988 Hindered settling and hydrodynamic dispersion in quiescent sedimenting suspensions. Intl J. Multiphase Flow (in press).
Hassen, M. A. 1987 Interface spreading in polydisperse sedimentation. M.S. thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.
Herdan, G. 1960 Small Particle Statistics, 2nd edn. Academic.
Leighton, D. & Acrivos, A. 1987a Measurement of the shear-induced coefficient of self-diffusion in concentrated suspensions of solid spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 109–131.Google Scholar
Leighton, D. & Acrivos, A. 1987b The shear induced migration of particles in concentrated suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 415–439.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. F. & Zaki, W. N. 1954 Sedimentation and fluidisation: Part 1. Trans. Instn Chem. Engrs 32, 35–52.Google Scholar
Smith, T. N. 1966 The sedimentation of particles having a dispersion of sizes. Trans. Instn Chem. Engrs 44, 153–157.Google Scholar
Tory, E. M. & Pickard, D. K. 1986 Experimental evidence for a stochastic approach to sedimentation. Proc. Engng Foundation Conf. on Flocculation, Sedimentation and Consolidation, Sea Island, Georgia, Jan. 27–Feb. 1, 1985 (ed. B. M. Moudgil and P. Somasundaran), pp. 297–306. AIChE.