Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:37:31.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parameter dependences of the onset of turbulent liquid-jet breakup

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2016

Alan R. Kerstein*
Affiliation:
72 Lomitas Road, Danville, CA 94526, USA
Amirreza Movaghar
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
Michael Oevermann
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Email address for correspondence: alan.kerstein@gmail.com

Abstract

Previous studies have predicted $We^{-2/5}$ dependence of the streamwise location at which primary breakup of turbulent liquid jets begins and $We^{-3/5}$ dependence of the Sauter mean diameter (SMD) of droplets released at that location, where $We$ is the jet Weber number. Measured deviations from these predictions were attributed to measurement uncertainties and to the simplicity of the analysis, which invoked turbulence inertial-range phenomenology. Here, it is proposed that breakup onset is instead controlled by the residual presence of the boundary-layer structure of the nozzle flow in the near field of the jet. Assuming that the size of the breakup-inducing eddy is within the scale range of the log-law region, $We^{-1}$ dependence of both the onset location and the SMD at onset is predicted. These dependences agree with the available measurements more closely than those previously predicted. To predict the dependences on the Reynolds number $Re$, either the friction velocity in conjunction with the Blasius friction law or the bulk velocity can be used, where the former yields $Re^{3/8}$ and $Re^{1/4}$ dependence of the onset location and the SMD at onset respectively, while the latter implies no $Re$ dependence of either. The latter result is consistent with the available measurements, but the boundary-layer analysis indicates that the velocity scaling should be based on the friction velocity rather than the bulk velocity, so the origin of the measured lack of $Re$ dependence merits further investigation. A plausible hypothesis is that pressure effects associated with the transition from wall-bounded nozzle flow to jet free-slip boundary conditions induce a transient large-scale flow modification that counteracts the $Re$ dependence of the nozzle flow while preserving the logarithmic flow structure near the jet surface. Notwithstanding the absence of direct evidence supporting this hypothesis, the new analysis and comparisons of its predictions with measurements suggest that transient effects such as the residual influence of the nozzle-flow structure are the likely explanations of the observed parameter dependences.

Type
Rapids
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kourmatzis, A. & Masri, A. R. 2014 Air-assisted atomization of liquid jets in varying levels of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 764, 95132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansour, A. & Chigier, N. 1994 Turbulent characteristics in cylindrical liquid jets. Phys. Fluids 6, 33803391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raynal, L.1997 Instabilite et entrainment a l’interface d’une couche de melange liquid-gaz. PhD thesis, Universite Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
Sallam, K. A. & Faeth, G. M. 2003 Surface properties during primary breakup of turbulent liquid jets in still air. AIAA J. 41, 15141524.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. & Gersten, K. 2000 Boundary-Layer Theory, 8th edn. Springer.Google Scholar
Varga, C. M., Lasheras, J. C. & Hopfinger, E. J. 2003 Initial breakup of a small-diameter liquid jet by a high-speed gas stream. J. Fluid Mech. 497, 405434.Google Scholar
Wolf, D. H., Incropera, F. P. & Viskanta, R. 1995 Measurements of the turbulent flow field in a free-surface jet of water. Exp. Fluids 18, 397408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, P.-K. & Faeth, G. M. 1995 Onset and end of drop formation along the surface of turbulent liquid jets in still gases. Phys. Fluids 7, 29152917.Google Scholar
Wu, P.-K., Miranda, R. F. & Faeth, G. M. 1995 Effects of initial flow conditions on primary breakup of nonturbulent and turbulent liquid jets. Atomiz. Sprays 5, 175196.Google Scholar