Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T19:53:31.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the effects of frontogenetic strain on symmetric instability and inertia–gravity waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2012

Leif N. Thomas
Leif N. Thomas*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: leift@stanford.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dynamics of symmetric instability and two-dimensional inertia–gravity waves in a baroclinic geostrophic flow undergoing frontogenesis is analysed. A frontogenetic strain associated with a balanced deformation field drives an ageostrophic circulation and temporal variations in the basic state that significantly affect the properties of perturbations to the background flow. For stable stratification, perturbations to the basic state result in symmetric instability or inertia–gravity waves, depending on the sign of the Ertel potential vorticity and the magnitude of the Richardson number of the geostrophic flow. The kinetic energy (KE) of both types of motion is suppressed by frontogenetic strain due to the vertical shear in the ageostrophic circulation. This is because the perturbation streamlines tilt with the ageostrophic shear causing the disturbances to lose KE via shear production. The effect can completely dampen symmetric instability for sufficiently strong strain even though the source of KE for the instability (the vertical shear in the geostrophic flow) increases with time. Inertia–gravity waves in a baroclinic flow undergoing frontogenesis simultaneously lose KE and extract KE from the deformation field as they decay. This is because the horizontal velocity of the waves becomes rectilinear, resulting in a Reynolds stress that draws energy from the balanced flow. The process is most effective for waves of low frequency and for a geostrophic flow with low Richardson number. However, even in a background flow that is initially strongly stratified, frontogenesis leads to an exponentially fast reduction in the Richardson number, facilitating a rapid energy extraction by the waves. The KE transferred from the deformation field is ultimately lost to the unbalanced ageostrophic circulation through shear production, hence the inertia–gravity waves play a catalytic role in loss of balance. Given the large amount of KE in low-frequency inertia–gravity waves and the ubiquitous combination of strain and baroclinic geostrophic currents in the ocean, it is estimated that this mechanism could play a significant role in the removal of KE from both the internal wave and mesoscale eddy fields.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Baroclinic flows Geophysical and Geological Flows: Internal waves Geophysical and Geological Flows: Rotating flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 711 , 25 November 2012 , pp. 620 - 640
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Alford, M. 2003 Redistribution of energy available for ocean mixing by long-range propagation of internal waves. Nature 423, 159–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Alford, M. & Zhao, Z. 2007 Global patterns of low-mode internal-wave propagation. Part II: Group velocity. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 37, 1849–1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Barad, M. F. & Fringer, O. B. 2010 Simulations of shear instabilities in interfacial gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 644, 61–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bender, C. M. & Orszag, S. A. 1999 Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bühler, O. & McIntyre, M. 2005 Wave capture and wave–vortex duality. J. Fluid Mech. 534, 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Capet, X., McWilliams, J. C., Molemaker, M. J. & Shchepetkin, A. F. 2008 Mesoscale to submesoscale transition in the California current system. Part III. Energy balance and flux. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38, 2256–2269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Craik, A. D. D. 1989 The stability of unbounded two- and three-dimensional flows subject to body forces: some exact solutions. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. D’Asaro, E., Lee, C. M., Rainville, L., Harcourt, R. & Thomas, L. N. 2011 Enhanced mixing and energy dissipation at ocean fronts. Science 15, 318–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Dritschel, D. G., Haynes, P. H., Juckes, M. N. & Shepherd, T. G. 1991 The stability of a two-dimensional vorticity filament under uniform strain. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 647–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Ferrari, R. & Wunsch, C. 2009 Ocean circulation kinetic energy: reservoirs, sources, and sinks. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 253–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Ferrari, R. & Wunsch, C. 2010 The distribution of eddy kinetic and potential energies in the global ocean. Tellus A 62, 92–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Haine, T. W. N. & Marshall, J. 1998 Gravitational, symmetric, and baroclinic instability of the ocean mixed layer. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 28, 634–658.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hoskins, B. J. 1974 The role of potential vorticity in symmetric stability and instability. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 480–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Hoskins, B. J. 1982 The mathematical theory of frontogenesis. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 14, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Hoskins, B. J. & Bretherton, F. P. 1972 Atmospheric frontogenesis models: mathematical formulation and solution. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 11–37.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Kunze, E. 1985 Near-inertial wave propagation in geostrophic shear. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 15, 544–565.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Lapeyre, G., Klein, P. & Hua, B. L. 2006 Oceanic restratification forced by surface frontogenesis. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 36, 1577–1590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. McWilliams, J. C. 2008 Fluid dynamics at the margin of rotational control. Environ. Fluid Mech. 8, 441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Miles, J. W. 1963 On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 16, 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Molemaker, J., McWilliams, J. C. & Capet, X. 2010 Balanced and unbalanced routes to dissipation in an equilibrated Eady flow. J. Fluid Mech. 654, 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Mooers, C. N. K. 1975 Several effects of a baroclinic current on the cross-stream propagation of inertial-internal waves. Geophys. Fluid Dyn. 6, 245–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Müller, P. 1976 On the diffusion of momentum and mass by internal gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 789–823.Google Scholar
23. Pawlak, G. & Armi, L. 1998 Vortex dynamics in a spatially accelerating shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 376, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Phillips, O. M. 1966 The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean, pp. 178–185 Cambridge University Press, chap. 5.Google Scholar
25. Polzin, K. L. 2010 Mesoscale eddy-internal wave coupling. Part II. Energetics and results from polymode. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 789–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Rhines, P. B. 1979 Geostrophic turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11, 401–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Taylor, J. & Ferrari, R. 2009 The role of secondary shear instabilities in the equilibration of symmetric instability. J. Fluid Mech. 622, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Taylor, J. & Ferrari, R. 2010 Buoyancy and wind-driven convection at a mixed-layer density fronts. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 1222–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Thomas, L., Tandon, A. & Mahadevan, A. 2008 Submesoscale processes and dynamics. In Ocean Modelling in an Eddying Regime (ed. Hecht, M. & Hasumi, H. ), Geophysical Monograph Series , vol. 177, pp. 17–38. American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Thomas, L. N. & Taylor, J. R. 2010 Reduction of the usable wind-work on the general circulation by forced symmetric instability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L18606 doi:10.1029/2010GL044680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Thomas, L. N., Taylor, J. R., Ferrari, R. & Joyce, T. M. 2012 Symmetric instability in the Gulf Stream. Deep-Sea Res. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Whitt, D. B. & Thomas, L. N. 2012 Near-inertial waves in strongly baroclinic currents. Part I: normal incidence. J. Phys. Oceanogr. (submitted).Google Scholar
33. Wunsch, C. & Ferrari, R. 2004 Vertical mixing, energy, and the general circulation of the oceans. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 281–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Young, W. R. & Ben-Jelloul, M. 1997 Propagation of near-inertial oscillations through a geostrophic flow. J. Mar. Res. 55, 735–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar