Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:58:38.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On subsonic boundary-layer receptivity to acoustic waves over an aircraft wing coated by a thin liquid film

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2022

F. Khoshsepehr Open the ORCID record for F. Khoshsepehr [Opens in a new window]  and
A.I. Ruban Open the ORCID record for A.I. Ruban [Opens in a new window]
F. Khoshsepehr*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2AZ, UK
A.I. Ruban
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2AZ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: f.khoshsepehr16@imperial.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work is concerned with the laminar–turbulent transition in the boundary layer on an aircraft wing covered by a water film. We consider the initial stage of the transition process known as the receptivity of the boundary layer, namely, we study the generation of the interfacial instability waves by the unsteady free-stream acoustic noise interacting with a small roughness on the wing surface. For effective receptivity, the ‘forcing’ should obey the so-called ‘double-resonance’ principle. According to this principle, both the frequency and the wavenumber of the external perturbations should be in tune with the natural instability modes of the flow. Correspondingly, we choose the frequency of the acoustic wave to coincide with that of the interfacial instability wave. However, this makes the wavelength of the acoustic wave significantly larger than wavelength of the instability wave. Thus, the second resonance condition is not satisfied, which means that the acoustic wave alone cannot produce the instability waves in the boundary layer. Instead, the Stokes layer is created in the boundary layer just above the liquid film. As far as the film is concerned, it also experiences wave-like motion caused by the varying shear stress on the interface. The generation of the interfacial instability waves takes place when the Stokes layer encounters a wall roughness that is short enough for an appropriate scale conversion to take place. To describe the flow in the vicinity of the roughness, a suitably modified triple-deck theory is used.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer receptivity
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 943 , 25 July 2022 , A6
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brennan, G.S., Gajjar, J.S.B. & Hewitt, R.E. 2021 Tollmien–Schlichting wave cancellation via localised heating elements in boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 909, A16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimpeanu, R., Papageorgiou, D., Kravtsova, M.A. & Ruban, A.I. 2015 The effect of thin liquid films on boundary-layer separation. In APS Meeting Abstracts.Google Scholar
Coward, A.V. & Hall, P. 1996 The stability of two-phase flow over a swept wing. J. Fluid Mech. 329, 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Tullio, N. 2013 Receptivity and transition to turbulence of supersonic boundary layers with surface roughness. PhD thesis, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
De Tullio, N. & Ruban, A.I. 2015 A numerical evaluation of the asymptotic theory of receptivity for subsonic compressible boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 771, 520–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denier, J.P., Hall, P. & Seddougui, S.O. 1991 On the receptivity problem for Görtler vortices: vortex motion induced by wall roughness. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 335, 51–85.Google Scholar
Dong, M., Liu, Y. & Wu, X. 2020 Receptivity of inviscid modes in supersonic boundary layers due to scattering of free-stream sound by localised wall roughness. J. Fluid Mech. 896, A23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duck, P.W., Ruban, A.I. & Zhikharev, C.N. 1996 The generation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves by free-stream turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 312, 341–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M.E. 1985 Scattering of acoustic waves into Tollmien–Schlichting waves by small streamwise variation in surface geometry. J. Fluid Mech. 154, 509–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachanov, Yu.S., Kozlov, V.V. & Levchenko, V.Ya. 1982 The Apearence of Turbulence in the Boundary Layer. Nauka.Google Scholar
Lin, C.C. 1946 On the stability of two-dimensional parallel flows. Part 3. Stabilty in a viscous fluid. Q. Appl. Maths 3, 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messiter, A.F. 1970 Boundary-layer flow near the trailing edge of a flat plate. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 18 (1), 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neiland, V.Ya. 1969 Theory of laminar boundary layer separation in supersonic flow. Fluid Dyn. 4 (4), 33–35.Google Scholar
Raposo, H., Mughal, S., Bensalah, A. & Ashworth, R. 2021 Acoustic-roughness receptivity in subsonic boundary-layer flows over aerofoils. J. Fluid Mech. 925, A7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruban, A.I. 1984 On Tollmien–Schlichting wave generation by sound. Fluid Dyn. 19 (5), 709–717.Google Scholar
Ruban, A.I. 2018 Fluid Dynamics. Part 3. Boundary Layers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruban, A.I., Bernots, T. & Kravtsova, M.A. 2016 Linear and nonlinear receptivity of the boundary layer in transonic flows. J. Fluid Mech. 786, 154–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saric, W.S., Hoos, J.A. & Radeztsky, R.H. 1991 Boundary-layer receptivity of sound with roughness. In Boundary Layer Stability and Transition to Turbulence, pp. 17–22.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. 1974 Upstream propagation of unsteady disturbances in supersonic boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 465–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubauer, G.B. & Skramsted, H.K. 1948 Laminar boundary-layer oscillations and transition on a flat plate. NACA Tech. Rep. 909. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.Google Scholar
Smith, F.T. 1979 a Nonlinear stability of boundary layers for disturbances of various sizes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 368, 573–589.Google Scholar
Smith, F.T. 1979 b On the nonparallel flow stability of the Blasius boundary layer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 366, 91–109.Google Scholar
Stewartson, K. 1969 On the flow near the trailing edge of a flat plate. Mathematika 16 (1), 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewartson, K. & Williams, P.G. 1969 Self-induced separation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 312, 181–206.Google Scholar
Sychev, V.V., Ruban, A.I., Sychev, V.V. & Korolev, G.L. 1998 Asymptotic Theory of Separated Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terent'ev, E.D. 1981 Linear problem for a vibrator in subsonic boundary layer. Prikl. Mat. Mech. 45, 1049–1055.Google Scholar
Timoshin, S.N. 1997 Instabilities in a high-reynolds-number boundary layer on a film-coated surface. J. Fluid Mech. 353, 163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsao, J.-Ch., Rothmayer, A.P. & Ruban, A.I. 1997 Stability of air flow past thin liquid films on airfoils. Comput. Fluids 26 (5), 427–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. 1999 Generation of Tollmien–Schlichting waves by convecting gusts interacting with sound. J. Fluid Mech. 397, 285–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. 2001 Receptivity of boundary layers with distributed roughness to vortical and acoustic disturbances; a second order asymptotic theory and comparison with experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 431, 91–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar