Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T22:27:50.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On imploding cylindrical and spherical shock waves in a perfect gas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2006

N. F. PONCHAUT
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, USA
H. G. HORNUNG
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, USA
D. I. PULLIN
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, USA
C. A. MOUTON
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA 91125, USA

Abstract

The problem of a cylindrically or spherically imploding and reflecting shock wave in a flow initially at rest is studied without the use of the strong-shock approximation. Dimensional arguments are first used to show that this flow admits a general solution where an infinitesimally weak shock from infinity strengthens as it converges towards the origin. For a perfect-gas equation of state, this solution depends only on the dimensionality of the flow and on the ratio of specific heats. The Guderley power-law result can then be interpreted as the leading-order, strong-shock approximation, valid near the origin at the implosion centre. We improve the Guderley solution by adding two further terms in the series expansion solution for both the incoming and the reflected shock waves. A series expansion, valid where the shock is still weak and very far from the origin, is also constructed. With an appropriate change of variables and using the exact shock-jump conditions, a numerical, characteristics-based solution is obtained describing the general shock motion from almost infinity to very close to the reflection point. Comparisons are made between the series expansions, the characteristics solution, and the results obtained using an Euler solver. These show that the addition of two terms to the Guderley solution significantly extends the range of validity of the strong-shock series expansion.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)