Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T00:16:43.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonlinear development of flow in channels with non-parallel walls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

O. R. Tutty
O. R. Tutty
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Southampton, Southampton SO 17 1BJ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Jeffery–Hamel flow, the motion of a viscous incompressible fluid between rigid plane walls, unidirectional flow is impossible if the angle between the walls exceeds a critical value of 2α2 which depends on the Reynolds number. In this paper the nonlinear development of the flow near this critical value is studied through numerical solutions of the two-dimensional Navier–-Stokes equations for flow in divergent channels with piecewise straight walls. It is found that if the angle between the walls exceeds 2α2 then Jeffery–-Hamel flow does not occur, and the solution takes the form of a large-amplitude wave with eddies attached alternately to the upper and lower walls. When viewed in the appropriate coordinate system, far downstream the wave has constant wavelength and strength, although, physically, there is a linear increase in wavelength with distance downstream, i.e. the wavelength is proportional to the channel width. If the angle between the walls is less than 2α2, then the existence (or otherwise) of the wave depends on the conditions near the inlet, in particular the local geometry of the channel. Jeffery–-Hamel flow is obtained downstream of the inlet for angles well below 2α2, but close to but below the critical value, solutions have been obtained with the wave extending (infinitely) far downstream. The wavelengths obtained numerically were compared with those from linear theory with spatially developing steady modes. No agreement was found: the wavelengths from the steady Navier–-Stokes solutions are significantly larger than that predicted by the theory. However, in other important aspects the results of this study are consistent with those from previous studies of the development/existence of Jeffery–-Hamel flow, in particular as regards the importance of the upstream conditions and the subcritical nature of the spatial development of the flow near the critical boundary in the Reynolds number–wall angle parameter space.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 326 , 10 November 1996 , pp. 265 - 284
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armaly, B. F., Durst, F., Pereira, J. C. F. & Schonung, B. 1983 Experimental and theoretical investigation of a backward-facing step flow. J. Fluid Mech. 127, 473–496.Google Scholar
Banks, W. H. H., Drazin, P. G. & Zaturska, M. B. 1988 On perturbations of Jeffery—Hamel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 186, 559–581.Google Scholar
Buitrago, S. E. 1983 Detailed analysis of higher Jeffery—Hamel solutions. M.Phil, thesis, University of Sussex.
Fraenkel, L. E. 1962 Laminar flow in symmetrical channels with slightly curved walls. I. On the Jeffery—Hamel solutions for flow between plane walls. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 267, 119–138.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, L. E. 1963 Laminar flow in symmetrical channels with slightly curved walls. II. An asymptotic series for the streamfunction. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 272, 406–428.Google Scholar
Hamadiche, M., Scott, J. & Jeandel, D. 1994 Temporal stability of Jeffery—Hamel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 268, 71–88.Google Scholar
Hamel, G. 1916 Spiralfömrige Bewegungen zäher Flüssigkeiten. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Math. Vereinigung 25, 34–60.Google Scholar
Jeffery, G. B. 1915 The two-dimensional steady motion of a viscous fluid. Phil. Mag (6) 29, 455–465.Google Scholar
Pedley, T. J. & Stephanoff, K. D. 1985 Flow along a channel with a time-dependent indentation in one wall: the generation of vorticity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 160, 337–367.Google Scholar
Sobey, I. J. 1985 Observations of waves during oscillatory channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 151, 395–426.Google Scholar
Sobey, I. J. & Drazin, P. G. 1986 Bifurcation of two-dimensional channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 171, 263–287.Google Scholar
Tutty, O. R. 1992 Pulsatile flow in a constricted channel. Trans ASME: J. Biomech. Engng 114, 50–54.Google Scholar
Tutty, O. R. & Pedley, T. J. 1993 Oscillatory flow in a stepped channel. J. Fluid Mech. 247, 179–204.Google Scholar