Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:43:51.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A model for characterization of a vortex pair formed by shock passage over a light-gas inhomogeneity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Joseph Yang ,
Toshi Kubota  and
Edward E. Zukoski
Joseph Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Toshi Kubota
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Edward E. Zukoski
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work investigates the two-dimensional flow of a shock wave over a circular light-gas inhomogeneity in a channel with finite width. The pressure gradient from the shock wave interacts with the density gradient at the edge of the inhomogeneity to deposit vorticity around the perimeter, and the structure rolls up into a pair of counter-rotating vortices. The aim of this study is to develop an understanding of the scaling laws for the flow field produced by this interaction at times long after the passage of the shock across the inhomogeneity. Numerical simulations are performed for various initial conditions and the results are used to guide the development of relatively simple algebraic models that characterize the dynamics of the vortex pair, and that allow extrapolation of the numerical results to conditions more nearly of interest in practical situations. The models are not derived directly from the equations of motion but depend on these equations and on intuition guided by the numerical results. Agreement between simulations and models is generally good except for a vortex-spacing model which is less satisfactory.

A practical application of this shock-induced vortical flow is rapid and efficient mixing of fuel and oxidizer in a SCRAMJET combustion chamber. One possible injector design uses the interaction of an oblique shock wave with a jet of light fuel to generate vorticity which stirs and mixes the two fluids and lifts the burning jet away from the combustor wall. Marble proposed an analogy between this three-dimensional steady flow and the two-dimensional unsteady problem of the present investigation. Comparison is made between closely corresponding three-dimensional steady and two-dimensional unsteady flows, and a mathematical description of Marble's analogy is proposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 258 , 10 January 1994 , pp. 217 - 244
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boris, J. P. & Book, D. L. 1973 Flux-corrected transport. I. SHASTA, a fluid transport algorithm that works. J. Comput. Phys. 11, 38–69.Google Scholar
Haas, J.-F. 1984 Interaction of weak shock waves and discrete gas inhomogeneities PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Haas, J.-F. & Sturtevant, B. 1987 Interaction of weak shock waves with cylindrical and spherical gas inhomogeneities. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 41–76.Google Scholar
Hawley, J. F. & Zabusky, N. J. 1989 Vortex paradigm for shock-accelerated density interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1241–1244.Google Scholar
Hendricks, G. J. & Marble, F. E. 1991 Shock enhancement of supersonic combustion processes. In preparation.
Jacobs, J. W. 1992 Shock-induced mixing of a light-gas cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 234, 629–649.Google Scholar
Marble, F. E., Hendricks, G. J. & Zukoski, E. E. 1987 Progress toward shock enhancement of supersonic combustion processes. AIAA Paper 87-1880.
Marble, F. E., Zukoski, E. E., Jacobs, J. W., Hendricks, G. J. & Waitz, I. A. 1990 Shock enhancement and control of hypersonic mixing and combustion. AIAA Paper 90-1981.
Moore, D. W. & Pullin, D. I. 1987 The compressible vortex pair. J. Fluid Mech. 185, 171–204.Google Scholar
Oran, E. S. 1991 LCPFCT–A monotone algorithm for solving continuity equations. In preparation.
Picone, J. M. & Boris, J. P. 1988 Vorticity generation by shock propagation through bubbles in a gas. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 23–51.Google Scholar
Picone, J. M., Oran, E. S., Boris, J. P. & Young, T. R. 1985 Theory of vorticity generation by shock wave and flame interactions. In Dynamics of Shock Waves, Explosions, and Detonations, pp. 429–448. AIAA.
Pierrehumbert, R. T. 1980 A family of steady, translating vortex pairs with distributed vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 129–144.Google Scholar
Rudinger, G. & Somers, L. M. 1960 Behaviour of small regions of different gases carried in accelerated gas flows. J. Fluid Mech. 7, 161–176.Google Scholar
Waitz, I. A. 1992 Vorticity generation by contoured wall injectors. AIAA Paper 92-3550.
Yang, J. & Kubota, T. 1993 The steady motion of a symmetric, finite core size, counterrotating vortex pair in an unbounded domain. SIAM J. Appl. Maths (to appear).Google Scholar
Yang, J., Kubota, T. & Zukoski, E. E. 1993 Applications of shock-induced mixing to supersonic combustion. AIAA J. 31, 854–862.Google Scholar