Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Localization of flow structures using $\infty $ -norm optimization

  • D. P. G. Foures (a1), C. P. Caulfield (a1) (a2) and P. J. Schmid (a3)

Abstract

Stability theory based on a variational principle and finite-time direct-adjoint optimization commonly relies on the kinetic perturbation energy density ${E}_{1} (t)= (1/ {V}_{\Omega } )\int \nolimits _{\Omega } e(\boldsymbol{x}, t)\hspace{0.167em} \mathrm{d} \Omega $ (where $e(\boldsymbol{x}, t)= \vert \boldsymbol{u}{\vert }^{2} / 2$ ) as a measure of disturbance size. This type of optimization typically yields optimal perturbations that are global in the fluid domain $\Omega $ of volume ${V}_{\Omega } $ . This paper explores the use of $p$ -norms in determining optimal perturbations for ‘energy’ growth over prescribed time intervals of length $T$ . For $p= 1$ the traditional energy-based stability analysis is recovered, while for large $p\gg 1$ , localization of the optimal perturbations is observed which identifies confined regions, or ‘hotspots’, in the domain where significant energy growth can be expected. In addition, the $p$ -norm optimization yields insight into the role and significance of various regions of the flow regarding the overall energy dynamics. As a canonical example, we choose to solve the $\infty $ -norm optimal perturbation problem for the simple case of two-dimensional channel flow. For such a configuration, several solutions branches emerge, each of them identifying a different energy production zone in the flow: either the centre or the walls of the domain. We study several scenarios (involving centre or wall perturbations) leading to localized energy production for different optimization time intervals. Our investigation reveals that even for this simple two-dimensional channel flow, the mechanism for the production of a highly energetic and localized perturbation is not unique in time. We show that wall perturbations are optimal (with respect to the $\infty $ -norm) for relatively short and long times, while the centre perturbations are preferred for very short and intermediate times. The developed $p$ -norm framework is intended to facilitate worst-case analysis of shear flows and to identify localized regions supporting dominant energy growth.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence: dpgf2@cam.ac.uk

References

Hide All
Arratia, C., Caulfield, C. P. & Chomaz, J.-M. 2013 Transient perturbation growth in time-dependent mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 717, 90133.
Blackburn, H. M., Barkley, D. & Sherwin, S. J. 2008 Convective instability and transient growth in flow over a backward-facing step. J. Fluid Mech. 603, 271304.
Butler, K. M. & Farrell, B. F. 1992 Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow. Phys. Fluids A 4, 16371650.
Cherubini, S., De Palma, P., Robinet, J.-Ch. & Bottaro, A. 2010 Rapid path to transition via nonlinear localized optimal perturbations in a boundary-layer flow. Phys. Rev. E 82, 066302.
Chorin, A. J. 1968 Numerical solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. Maths Comput. 22 (104), 745762.
Douglas, S. C., Amari, S. & Kung, S.-Y. 1998 Gradient adaptation under unit-norm constraints. In Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE SP Workshop on Statistical Signal and Array Processing, pp. 144147.
Farrell, B. F. 1988 Optimal excitation of perturbations in viscous shear flow. Phys. Fluids 31, 20932102.
Farrell, B. F. & Ioannou, P. J. 1996 Generalized stability theory. Part II. Nonautonomous operators. J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 20412053.
Farrell, B. F. & Ioannou, P. J. 2003 Structural stability of turbulent jets. J. Atmos. Sci. 60, 21012118.
Foures, D. P. G., Caulfield, C. P. & Schmid, P. J. 2012 Variational framework for flow optimization using seminorm constraints. Phys. Rev. E 86, 026306.
Gustavsson, L. H. 1991 Energy growth of three-dimensional disturbances in plane Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 224, 241260.
Lindzen, R. S. 1988 Instability of plane parallel shear flow (toward a mechanistic picture of how it works). Pure Appl. Geophys. 126 (1), 103121.
Marquet, O., Sipp, D., Chomaz, J.-M. & Jacquin, L. 2008 Amplifier and resonator dynamics of a low-Reynolds-number recirculation bubble in a global framework. J. Fluid Mech. 605, 429443.
Monokrousos, A., Bottaro, A., Brandt, L., Di Vita, A. & Henningson, D. S. 2011 Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and the optimal path to turbulence in shear flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 134502.
Orr, W. M’F. 1907 The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. Part I. A perfect liquid. Part II. A viscous liquid. Proc. R. Irish Acad. Section A: Math. Phys. Sci. 27, 9138.
Orszag, S. A. 1971 Accurate solution of the Orr–Sommerfeld stability equation. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 689703.
Polak, E. 1971 Computational Methods in Optimization: A Unified Approach, vol. 77. Academic.
Pringle, C. C. T. & Kerswell, R. R. 2010 Using nonlinear transient growth to construct the minimal seed for shear flow turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 154502.
Rabin, S. M. E., Caulfield, C. P. & Kerswell, R. R. 2012 Triggering turbulence efficiently in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 712, 244272.
Reddy, S. C. & Henningson, D. S. 1993 Energy growth in viscous channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 252, 209238.
Reddy, S. C., Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 1993 Pseudospectra of the Orr–Sommerfeld operator. SIAM J. Appl. Maths. 53 (1), 1547.
Schmid, P. J. 2007 Nonmodal stability theory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39, 129162.
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer.
Selle, A., Fedkiw, R., Kim, B., Liu, Y. & Rossignac, J. 2008 An unconditionally stable MacCormack method. J. Sci. Comput. 35 (2), 350371.
Thomas, J. W. 1995 Numerical Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods, vol. 1. Springer.
Trefethen, L. N., Trefethen, A. E., Reddy, S. C. & Driscoll, T. A. 1993 Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues. Science 261, 578584.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

JFM classification

Localization of flow structures using $\infty $ -norm optimization

  • D. P. G. Foures (a1), C. P. Caulfield (a1) (a2) and P. J. Schmid (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed