Skip to main content Accessibility help

Large-scale structures in turbulent and reverse-transitional sink flow boundary layers

  • SHIVSAI AJIT DIXIT (a1) and O. N. RAMESH (a1)


Aspects of large-scale organized structures in sink flow turbulent and reverse-transitional boundary layers are studied experimentally using hot-wire anemometry. Each of the present sink flow boundary layers is in a state of ‘perfect equilibrium’ or ‘exact self-preservation’ in the sense of Townsend (The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 1st and 2nd edns, 1956, 1976, Cambridge University Press) and Rotta (Progr. Aeronaut. Sci., vol. 2, 1962, pp. 1–220) and conforms to the notion of ‘pure wall-flow’ (Coles, J. Aerosp. Sci., vol. 24, 1957, pp. 495–506), at least for the turbulent cases. It is found that the characteristic inclination angle of the structure undergoes a systematic decrease with the increase in strength of the streamwise favourable pressure gradient. Detectable wall-normal extent of the structure is found to be typically half of the boundary layer thickness. Streamwise extent of the structure shows marked increase as the favourable pressure gradient is made progressively severe. Proposals for the typical eddy forms in sink flow turbulent and reverse-transitional flows are presented, and the possibility of structural self-organization (i.e. individual hairpin vortices forming streamwise coherent hairpin packets) in these flows is also discussed. It is further indicated that these structural ideas may be used to explain, from a structural viewpoint, the phenomenon of soft relaminarization or reverse transition of turbulent boundary layers when subjected to strong streamwise favourable pressure gradients. Taylor's ‘frozen turbulence’ hypothesis is experimentally shown to be valid for flows in the present study even though large streamwise accelerations are involved, the flow being even reverse transitional in some cases. Possible conditions, which are required to be satisfied for the safe use of Taylor's hypothesis in pressure-gradient-driven flows, are also outlined. Measured convection velocities are found to be fairly close to the local mean velocities (typically 90% or more) suggesting that the structure gets convected downstream almost along with the mean flow.


Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence:


Hide All
Adrian, R. J., Meinhart, C. D. & Tomkins, C. D. 2000 Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 154.
Blackwelder, R. F. & Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1972 Large-scale motion of a turbulent boundary layer during relaminarization. J. Fluid Mech. 53, 6183.
Bradshaw, P. & Wong, F. Y. F. 1972 The reattachment and relaxation of a turbulent shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 113135.
Brown, G. L. & Thomas, A. S. W. 1977 Large structure in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 20 (10), S243S252.
Chauhan, K. A., Nagib, H. M. & Monkewitz, P. A. 2007 Evidence on non-universality of Kármán constant. In Progress in Turbulence II: Proceedings of the iTi Conference in Turbulence 2005 (ed. Oberlack, M., Khujadze, G., Günther, S., Weller, T., Frewer, M., Peinke, J. & Barth, S.), Springer Proceedings in Physics, pp. 159163. Springer.
Christensen, K. T. & Adrian, R. J. 2001 Statistical evidence of hairpin vortex packets in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 431, 433443.
Clauser, F. H. 1956 The turbulent boundary layer. Adv. Appl. Mech. 4, 151.
Colella, K. J. & Keith, W. L. 2003 Measurements and scaling of wall shear stress fluctuations. Exp. Fluids 34, 253266.
Coles, D. E. 1956 The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 191226.
Coles, D. E. 1957 Remarks on the equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. J. Aerosp. Sci. 24, 495506.
DeGraaff, D. B. & Eaton, J. K. 2000 Reynolds-number scaling of the flat-plate turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 319346.
Dennis, D. J. C. & Nickels, T. B. 2008 On the limitations of Taylor's hypothesis in constructing long structures in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 614, 197206.
Dixit, S. A. & Ramesh, O. N. 2008 Pressure-gradient-dependent logarithmic laws in sink flow turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 615, 445475.
Ganapathisubramani, B., Hutchins, N., Hambleton, W. T., Longmire, E. K. & Marusic, I. 2005 Investigation of large-scale coherence in a turbulent boundary layer using two-point correlations. J. Fluid Mech. 524, 5780.
Ganapathisubramani, B., Longmire, E. K. & Marusic, I. 2003 Characteristics of vortex packets in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 478, 3546.
Head, M. R. 1976 Eddy viscosity in turbulent boundary layers. Aeronaut. Quart. 27, 270276.
Head, M. R. & Bandyopadhyay, P. 1981 New aspects of turbulent boundary-layer structure. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 297338.
Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1983 Coherent structures – reality and myth. Phys. Fluids 26 (10), 28162850.
Hutchins, N., Nickels, T. B., Marusic, I. & Chong, M. S. 2009 Hot-wire spatial resolution issues in wall-bounded turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 635, 103136.
Jones, M. B., Marusic, I. & Perry, A. E. 2001 Evolution and structure of sink-flow turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 428, 127.
Krogstad, P.Å., Kaspersen, J. H. & Rimestad, S. 1998 Convection velocities in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 10 (4), 949957.
Krogstad, P.Å. & Skåre, P. E. 1995 Influence of a strong adverse pressure gradient on the turbulent structure in a boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 7 (8), 20142024.
Le, H., Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1997 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step. J. Fluid Mech. 330, 349374.
Lee, J. H. & Sung, S. J. 2009 Structures in turbulent boundary layers subjected to adverse pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 639, 101131.
Ligrani, P. M. & Bradshaw, P. 1987 Spatial resolution and measurement of turbulence in the viscous sublayer using subminiature hot-wire probes. Exp. Fluids 5, 401417.
Marusic, I. 2001 On the role of large-scale structures in wall turbulence. Phys. Fluids 13 (3), 735743.
Marusic, I. & Heuer, W. D. C. 2007 Reynolds number invariance of the structure inclination angle in wall turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (114504), 14.
Marusic, I., Kunkel, G. J. & Porté-Agel, F. 2001 Experimental study of wall boundary conditions for large-eddy simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 446, 309320.
Narasimha, R. 1983 Relaminarization – magnetohydrodynamic and otherwise. Progr. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 84, 3052.
Narasimha, R. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1973 Relaminarization in highly accelerated turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 417447.
Narasimha, R. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 1979 Relaminarization of fluid flows. Adv. Appl. Mech. 19, 221309.
Nickels, T. B. 2004 Inner scaling for wall-bounded flows subject to large pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 217239.
Österlund, J. M. 1999 Experimental studies of zero pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flow. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm.
Perry, A. E. & Chong, M. S. 1982 On the mechanism of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 173217.
Perry, A. E., Henbest, S. & Chong, M. S. 1986 A theoretical and experimental study of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 165, 163199.
Perry, A. E., Marusic, I. & Jones, M. B. 2002 On the streamwise evolution of turbulent boundary layers in arbitrary pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 461, 6191.
Perry, A. E., Marusic, I. & Li, J. D. 1994 Wall turbulence closure based on classical similarity laws and the attached eddy hypothesis. Phys. Fluids 6, 10241035.
Piomelli, U., Ferziger, J., Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1989 New approximate boundary conditions for large eddy simulations of wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids A1 (6), 10611068.
Robinson, S. K. 1991 Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 601639.
Rotta, J. C. 1962 Turbulent boundary layers in incompressible flow. Progr. Aeronaut. Sci. 2, 1220.
Saddoughi, S. G. & Veeravalli, S. V. 1994 Local isotropy in turbulent boundary layers at high Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 268, 333372.
Schlichting, H. & Gersten, K. 2000 Boundary-Layer Theory, 8th edn. Springer.
Spalart, P. R. & Leonard, A. 1987 Direct numerical simulation of equilibrium turbulent boundary layers. In Turbulent Shear Flows 5 (ed. Durst, F., Launder, B. E., Lumley, J. L., Schmidt, F. W. & Whitelaw, J. H.), pp. 234252. Springer.
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1981 Relaminarizing flows (data evaluation). In The 1980-81 AFOSR-HTTM Stanford Conference on Complex Turbulent Flows: A Comparison of Computation and Experiment (ed. Cantwell, B. J., Kline, S. J. & Lilley, G. M.), vol. II, pp. 567581. Stanford University Press.
Sreenivasan, K. R. 1982 Laminarescent, relaminarizing and retransitional flows. Acta Mech. 44, 148.
Taylor, G. I. 1938 The spectrum of turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. A 164, 476490.
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.
Townsend, A. A. 1956 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press.
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear flow, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
Uddin, A. K. M., Perry, A. E. & Marusic, I. 1997 On the validity of Taylor's hypothesis in wall turbulence. J. Mech. Engng Res. Dev. 19–20, 5766.
Wark, C. E. & Nagib, H. M. 1991 Experimental investigation of coherent structures in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 183208.
Wu, X. & Moin, P. 2009 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a nominally zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 630, 541.
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed