Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:31:47.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of incidence angle on sound generation by airfoils interacting with high-frequency gusts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Matthew R. Myers
Affiliation:
Hydrodynamics and Acoustics Branch, US Food and Drug Administration, HFZ-132, Rockville, MD 20817, USA
E. J. Kerschen
Affiliation:
Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

Abstract

A theoretical model is developed for the sound generated when a convected vortical or entropic gust encounters an airfoil at non-zero angle of attack. The theory is based on a linearization of the Euler equations about the steady subsonic flow past the airfoil. High-frequency gusts, whose wavelengths are short compared to the airfoil chord, but long compared to the displacement of the mean-flow stagnation point from the leading edge, are considered. The analysis utilizes singular-perturbation techniques and involves four asymptotic regions. Local regions, which scale on the gust wavelength, are present at the airfoil leading and trailing edges. Behind the airfoil a ‘transition’ region, which is similar to the transition zone between illuminated and shadow zones in optical problems, is present. In the outer region, far away from the airfoil edges and wake, the solution has a geometric-acoustics form. The primary sound generation is found to be concentrated in the local leading-edge region. The trailing edge plays a secondary role as a scatterer of the sound generated in the leading-edge region. Parametric calculations are presented which illustrate that moderate levels of airfoil steady loading can significantly affect the sound field produced by airfoil–gust interactions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1965 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Betts, A. K. 1973 Non-precipitating cumulus convection and its parameterization. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 99, 178196.Google Scholar
Carmack, E. C. & Farmer, D. M. 1982 Cooling processes in deep temperate lakes: A review with examples from two lakes in British Columbia. J. Mar. Res. 40, 85111.Google Scholar
Carson, D. J. 1973 The development of a dry inversion-capped convectively unstable boundary layer. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 99, 450467.Google Scholar
Crapper, P. F. & Linden, P. F. 1974 The structure of turbulent density interfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 4563.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J. W., Willis, G. E. & Lilly, D. K. 1969 Laboratory investigation of non-steady penetrative convection. J. Fluid Mech. 35, 731.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J. W., Willis, G. E. & Stockton, B. H. 1980 Laboratory studies of the entrainment zone of a convectively mixed layer. J. Fluid Mech. 100, 4164.Google Scholar
Denton, R. A. & Wood, I. R. 1981 Penetrative convection at low Péclet number. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 121 (referred to herein as DW).Google Scholar
Fernando, H. J. S. 1991 Turbulent mixing in stratified fluids. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 455493.Google Scholar
Fernando, H. J. S. & Little, L. J. 1990 Molecular-diffusive effects in penetrative convection. Phys. Fluids A 2, 15921596.Google Scholar
Fernando, H. J. S. & Long, R. R. 1985 On the nature of the entrainment interface of a two-layer fluid subjected to zero-mean-shear turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 151, 2153.Google Scholar
Gubbins, D., Thomson, C. J. & Whaler, K. A. 1982 Stable regions in the Earth's liquid core. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 68, 241251.Google Scholar
Hannoun, I. A. & List, E. J. 1988 Turbulent mixing at a shear-free density interface. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 211234.Google Scholar
Hopfinger, E. J. & Linden, P. F. 1982 Formation of thermoclines in zero-mean-shear turbulence subjected to a stabilizing buoyancy flux. J. Fluid Mech. 114, 157173.Google Scholar
Howard, L. N. 1966 Convection at high Rayleigh number. In Proc. 11th Intl. Congr. Appl. Mech., Munich, pp. 11091115. Springer.
Jaupart, C. & Brandeis, G. 1986 The stagnant bottom layer of convecting magma chambers. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 80, 183199.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. C. 1991 Erosion of a stable density gradient by sedimentation-driven convection. Nature 353, 423425.Google Scholar
Lick, W. 1965 The instability of a fluid layer with time-dependent heating. J. Fluid Mech. 21, 565576.Google Scholar
Linden, P. F. 1973 The interaction of vortex rings with a sharp density interface: a model of turbulent entrainment. J. Fluid Mech. 60, 467480.Google Scholar
Mory, M. 1991 A model of turbulent mixing across a density interface including the effect of rotation. J. Fluid Mech. 223, 193207.Google Scholar
Noh, Y. & Fernando, H. J. S. 1993 The role of molecular diffusion in the deepening of the mixed layer. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 17, 187215.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1977 The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean. Cambridge University Press.
Rouse, H. & Dodu, J. 1955 Turbulent diffusion across a density discontinuity. Houille Blanch 10, 522532.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, M. 1958 Structure and Evolution of Stars. Princeton University Press.
Tennekes, H. 1973 A model for the dynamics of the inversion above a convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 30, 558567.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1973 Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Zilitinkevich, S. S. 1991 Turbulent Penetrative Convection. Avebury.