Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:21:57.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow of fluid of non-uniform viscosity in converging and diverging channels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Alison Hooper
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Bristol University
B. R. Duffy
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street, Cambridge
H. K. Moffatt
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street, Cambridge

Abstract

It is shown that the well-known Jeffery–Hamel solution of the Navier–Stokes equations admits generalization to the case in which the viscosity μ and density ρ are arbitrary functions of the angular co-ordinate θ. When |Rα| [Lt ] 1, where R is the Reynolds number and 2α the angle of divergence of the planes, lubrication theory is applicable; this limit is first treated in the context of flow in a channel of slowly varying width. The Jeffery–Hamel problem proper is treated in §§ 3–6, and the effect of varying the viscosity ratio λ in a two-fluid situation is studied. In § 5, results already familiar in the single-fluid context are recapitulated and reformulated in a manner that admits immediate adaptation to the two-fluid situation, and in § 6 it is shown that the singlefluid limit (λ → 1) is in a certain sense degenerate. The necessarily discontinuous behaviour of the velocity profile as the Reynolds number (based on volume flux) increases is elucidated. Finally, in § 7, some comments are made about the realizability of these flows and about instabilities to which they may be subject.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1982 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barenblatt, G. I. & Zel'dovich, Ya. B. 1972 Self-similar solutions as intermediate asymptotics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 4, 285.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Benjamin, T. B. 1976 Applications of Leray-Schauder degree theory to problems of hydrodynamic stability. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 79, 383.Google Scholar
Bulakh, B. M. 1964 On higher approximations in the boundary-layer theory. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 28, 675.Google Scholar
Eagles, P. M. 1966 The stability of a family of Jeffery-Hamel solutions for divergent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 24, 191.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, L. E. 1962 Laminar flow in symmetrical channels with slightly curved walls. I. On the Jeffery-Hamel solutions for flow between plane walls. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 267, 119.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. 1938 Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics, vol. 1. Clarendon.
Hamel, G. 1916 Spiralförmige Bewegungen zäher Flüssigkeiten. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Math. Vereinigung. 25, 34.Google Scholar
Jeffery, G. B. 1915 Steady motion of a viscous fluid. Phil. Mag. Ser. 6, 29, 455.
Millsaps, K. & Pohlhausen, K. 1953 Thermal distributions in Jeffery-Hamel flows between non-parallel plane walls. J. Aero. Res. 20, 187.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. & Duffy, B. R. 1980 Local similarity solutions and their limitations. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 299.Google Scholar
Rosenhead, L. 1940 The steady two-dimensional radial flow of viscous fluid between two inclined walls. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 175, 436.Google Scholar
Yih, C.-S. 1967 Instability due to viscosity stratification. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 337.Google Scholar