Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:31:09.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experiments on heat-stabilized laminar boundary layers in water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Steven J. Barker
Affiliation:
Poseidon Research and University of California at Los Angeles
Douglas Gile
Affiliation:
Marine Systems Division, Rockwell International

Abstract

There has been much recent interest in the stabilization of water boundary layers by wall heating. Calculations based upon linear stability theory have predicted transition Reynolds numbers as high as 200 million for a zero pressure gradient boundary layer over a heated wall. The experiment described in this paper was intended to investigate these predictions. The test boundary layer develops on the inside surface of a cylindrical tube which is 0·1 m in diameter and 6·1 m in length. The displacement thickness is small relative to the tube radius under all conditions of interest. The tube is heated by electrical heaters on the outside wall. The location of transition is determined by flush-mounted hot-film probes, or by flow visualization at the tube exit.

A transition Reynolds number of 15 million has been obtained without heat, which shows that free-stream turbulence and other perturbations are well controlled. A transition Reynolds number of 47 million has been obtained with an 8 °C wall overheat. However, as temperature is further increased there are no additional increases in transition Reynolds number, which is in contradiction to the theory. Several possible reasons for the discrepancy between theory and experiment have been investigated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1981 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Back, L. H., Cuffel, R. F. & Massier, P. F. 1969 A.I.A.A. J. 7, No. 4, 730.
Barker, S. J. & Jennings, C. 1977 The effect of wall heating on transition in water boundary layers, Proc. of NATO-AGARD Symp. on Laminar-Turbulent Transition, Copenhagen, p. 191.
Barker, S. J. 1978 Turbulence management in a high-speed water flow facilityM A.S.M.E.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1965 The effect of wind tunnel screens on nominally two-dimensional boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 679.Google Scholar
Chmielewski, G. E. 1974 J. Aircraft 11, 436.
Coresin, S. 1963 Turbulence: Experimental methods. In Handbuch der Physik, vol. 8, p. 523.
Kaups, K. & Smith, A. M. O. 1967 The laminar boundary layer in water with variable properties. Proc. ASME-AIChE Heat Transfer Conf., Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
Launder, B. E. 1964 Laminarization of the turbulent boundary layer by acceleration, M.I.T. Gas Tyrbine Lab Report 77.Google Scholar
Loehrke, R. I. & Nagib, H. M. 1972 Experiments on management of free-stream turbulence, NATO-AGARD Rep. 598.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. & McMahon, J. F. 1967 Trans. A.S.M.E. D, J. Basic Engng 81, 704.
Pankhurst, R. C. & Holder, D. W. 1954 Wind Tunnel Technique. Pitman.
Schlichting, H. 1968 Boundary Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill.
Smith, A. M. O. 1957 Transition, pressure gradient, and stability theory, Proc. 9th Int. Congress on Appl. Mech., Brussels, vol. 4, 234.Google Scholar
Spangler, J. G. & Wells, C. S. 1968 A.I.A.A. J. 6, 543.
Strazisar, A. J., Prahl & Reshotko, E. 1977 Stability of heated laminar boundary layers in water, Proc. NATO-AGARD Symposium on Laminar-Turbulent Transition, Copenhagen.
Wazzan, A. R., Okamura, T. T. & Smith, A. M. O. 1968 Trans. A.S.M.E. C. J. Heat Transfer 90, 109.
Wazzan, A. R., Okamura, T. T. & Smith, A. M. O. 1970 The stability and transition of heated and cooled incompressible boundary layers. Proc. 4th Int. Heat Transfer Conf., Paris.Google Scholar
Wells, C. S. 1967 A.I.A.A. J. 5, 172.
Wilson, S. D. R. & Gladwell, T. 1978 The stability of a two-dimensional stagnation flow to three-dimensional disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 84, 517.Google Scholar