Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:11:37.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of curvature and buoyancy on the laminar dispersion of solute in a horizontal tube

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

M. Emin Erdogan
Affiliation:
Present address: Division of Mechanics and Fluid Mechanics, Technical University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey. Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge
P. C. Chatwin
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge

Abstract

When a solute is injected into a straight circular tube through which a solvent is in steady laminar flow it spreads out longitudinally under the combined effect of molecular diffusion and advection with the flow. Taylor (1953) showed that, provided there is no density difference between the solute and the solvent, the distribution of mean concentration satisfies a diffusion equation with a certain longitudinal diffusivity for large times and with respect to axes moving with the discharge velocity. In the present paper it is shown by a general argument that this statement remains true if the pipe is uniformly curved. An expression is given for the diffusivity, valid when the radius of curvature is sufficiently large. For all common liquids and most gases the diffusivity is reduced by the curvature. The rest of the paper deals with the effects of buoyancy forces caused by a density difference between the solute and the solvent, when the tube is horizontal. It is shown that in general a longitudinal diffusivity does not exist and an equation is derived that replaces the diffusion equation if the effects of buoyancy are small. A prediction from this equation is that buoyancy should not have a noticeable effect on the longitudinal dispersion for Péclet numbers near a certain value at which the two opposing influences of horizontal spreading due to gravity and lateral mixing due to secondary flow are in balance. This prediction is consistent with some observations made by Reejhsinghani, Gill & Barduhn (1966).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1967 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ananthakrishnan, V., Gill, W. N. & Barduhn, A. J. 1965 A.I.Ch.E. J. 11, 1063.
Aris, R. 1956 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 235, 67.
Aris, R. 1959 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 252, 538.
Batchelor, G. K. & Townsend, A. A. 1956Turbulent diffusion’ in Surveys in Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
Batchelor, G. K. 1966 Proc. 2nd Australasian Conference on Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics, Auckland, Dec. 1965.
Bournia, A., Coull, J. & Houghton, G. 1961 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 261, 227.
Caro, C. G. 1966 J. Physiol. 185, 501.
Cuming, H. G. 1952 A.R.C.R. & M. no. 2880.
Dean, W. R. 1927 Phil. Mag. (7), 4, 208.
Dean, W. R. 1928 Phil. Mag. (7), 5, 673.
Del Casal, E. & Gill, W. N. 1962 A.I.Ch.E. J. 8, 570.
Evans, E. V. & Kenney, C. N. 1965 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 284, 540.
Lighthill, M. J. 1966 J. Inst. Maths. Applics. 2, 97.
Morton, B. R. 1959 Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 12, 410.
Reejhsinghani, N. S., Gill, W. N. & Barduhn, A. J. 1966 A.I.Ch.E. J. 12, 916.
Taylor, G. I. 1953 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 219, 186.
Taylor, G. I. 1954a Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 223, 446.
Taylor, G. I. 1954b Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 225, 473.
Taylor, G. I. 1966 Private communication (but see TAYLOR, G. I. 1929 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 124, 243).Google Scholar
Truesdell, L. C. 1963 Ph.D. Thesis. Case Institute of Technology, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A.
Van Deemter, J. J., Broeder, J. J. & Lauwerier, H. A. 1956 Appl. Sci. Res. A, 5, 374.
White, C. M. 1929 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 123, 645.