Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T20:29:15.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The deformation of a liquid drop moving normal to a plane wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

C. Pozrikidis
C. Pozrikidis
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mechanics and Engineering Sciences, R-011, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92122, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The deformation of a viscous drop moving under the action of gravity normal to a plane solid wall is studied. Under the assumption of creeping flow, the motion is studied as a function of the viscosity ratio between the drop and the suspending fluid, of surface tension, and of the initial drop configuration. Using the boundary integral formulation, the flow inside and outside the drop is represented in terms of a combined distribution of a single-layer and a double-layer potential of Green functions over the drop surface. The densities of these distributions are identified with the discontinuity in the interfacial surface stress, and with the interfacial velocity. The problem is formulated as a Fredholm integral equation of the second kind for the interfacial velocity which is solved by successive iterations. It is found that in the absence of surface tension, a drop moving away from the wall obtains an increasingly prolate shape, eventually ejecting a trailing tail. Depending on the initial drop configuration, ambient fluid may be entrained into the drop along or away from the axis of motion. Surface tension prevents the formation of the tail allowing the drop to maintain a compact shape throughout its evolution. The deformation of the drop has little effect on its speed of rise. A drop moving towards the wall obtains an increasingly oblate shape. In the absence of surface tension, the drop starts spreading in the radial direction reducing into a thinning layer of fluid. This layer is susceptible to the gravitational Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Surface tension restricts spreading, and allows the drop to attain a nearly steady hydrostatic shape. This is quite insensitive to the viscosity ratio and to the initial drop configuration. The evolution of the thin layer of fluid which is trapped between the drop and the wall is examined in detail, and with reference to film-drainage theory. It is shown that the assumptions underlying this theory are accurate when the surface tension is sufficiently large, and when the viscosity of the drop is of the same or lower order of magnitude as the viscosity of the ambient fluid. The numerical results are discussed with reference to film-drainage asymptotic theories.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 215 , June 1990 , pp. 331 - 363
Copyright
© 1990 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ascoli, E. P., Dandy, D. S. & Leal, L. G. 1990 Buoyancy-driven motion of a deformable drop toward a plane wall at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 213, 287–311.Google Scholar
Bart, E. 1968 The slow unsteady settling of a fluid sphere toward a flat fluid interface. Chem. Engng Sci. 23, 193–210.Google Scholar
Bashforth, F. & Adams, J. C. 1883 An Attempt to Test the Theories of Capillary Action. Cambridge University Press.
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Blake, J. R. 1971 A note on the image system for a Stokeslet in a no-slip boundary. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 70, 303–310.Google Scholar
Chen, J.-D. 1984 Effects of London—van der Waals and electric double layer forces on the thinning of a dimpled film between a small drop or bubble and a horizontal solid plane. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 98, 329–341.Google Scholar
Chervenivanova, E. & Zapryanov, Z. 1985 On the deformation of two droplets in a quasi-steady Stokes flow. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 11, 721–738.Google Scholar
Chervenivanova, E. & Zapryanov, Z. 1987 On the deformation of a fluid particle moving radially inside a spherical container. PhysichoChemical Hydr. 8, 293–305.Google Scholar
Chi, B. K. & Leal, L. G. 1989 A theoretical study of the motion of a viscous drop toward a fluid interface at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 201, 123–146.Google Scholar
Clift, R., Grace, J. R. & Weber, M. E. 1978 Bubbles, Drops, and Particles. Academic Press.
Dimitrov, D. S. & Ivanov, I. B. 1978 Hydrodynamics of thin liquid films. On the rate of thinning of microscopic films with deformable interfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 64, 97–106.Google Scholar
Gradshteyn, I. S. & Ryshik, I. M. 1980 Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. Academic.
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1986 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. Martinus Nijhoff.
Hartland, S. 1967 The approach of a liquid drop to a flat plate. Chem. Engng Sci. 22, 1675–1687.Google Scholar
Hartland, S. 1969 The profile of the draining film beneath a liquid drop approaching a plane interface. In Unusual Methods of Separation. Chem. Engng Prog. Symp. Series vol. 65, pp. 82–89.
Hartland, S. & Robinson, J. D. 1977 A model for an axisymmetric dimpled draining film. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 60, 72–81.Google Scholar
Hasimoto, H., Kim, M.-U. & Miyazaki, T. 1983 The effect of a semi-infinite plane on the motion of a small particle in a viscous fluid. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 52, 1996–2003.Google Scholar
Jaswon, M. A. & Symm, G. T. 1977 Integral Equation Methods in Potential Theory and Elastostatics. Academic.
Jones, A. F. & Wilson, S. D. R. 1978 The film drainage problem in droplet coalescence. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 263–288.Google Scholar
Kojima, M., Hinch, E. J. & Acrivos, A. 1984 The formation and expansion of a toroidal drop moving in a viscous fluid. Phys. Fluids 27, 19–32.Google Scholar
Koh, C. J. & Leal, L. G. 1989 The stability of drop shapes for translations at zero Reynolds number through a quiescent fluid. Phys. Fluids A 1, 1309–1313.Google Scholar
Lin, C.-Y. & Slattery, J. C. 1982 Thinning of a liquid film as a small drop or bubble approaches a solid plane. AIChE J. 28, 147–156.Google Scholar
Liron, N. & Blake, J. R. 1981 Existence of viscous eddies near boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 109–129.Google Scholar
Liron, N. & Shahar, R. 1978 Stokes flow due to a Stokeslet in a pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 727–744.Google Scholar
Miyazaki, T. & Hasimoto, H. 1984 The motion of a small sphere in fluid near a circular hole in a plane wall. J. Fluid Mech. 145, 201–221.Google Scholar
Oseen, C. W. 1927 Hydrodynamik. Leipzig.
Pozrridis, C. 1990 The instability of a moving viscous drop. J. Fluid Mech. 210, 1–21.Google Scholar
Rallison, J. M. 1984 The deformation of small viscous drops and bubbles in shear flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 45–66.Google Scholar
Rallison, J. M. & Acrivos, A. 1978 A numerical study of the deformation and burst of a viscous drop in an extensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 191–200.Google Scholar
Sano, O. & Hasimoto, H. 1978 The effect of two plane walls on the motion of a small sphere in a viscous fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 673–694.Google Scholar
Stone, H. A. & Leal, L. G. 1989 Relaxation and breakup of an initially extended drop in an otherwise quiescent fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 399–427.Google Scholar
Tran-Cong, T. & Phan-Thien, N. 1989 Stokes problems of multiparticle systems. A numerical method for arbitrary flows. Phys. Fluids A 1, 453–461.Google Scholar
Whitehead, J. A. 1988 Fluid models of geological hotspots. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 61–87.Google Scholar
Williams, M. B. & Davis, S. H. 1982 Nonlinear theory of film rupture. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 90, 220–228.Google Scholar
Wu, R. & Weinbaum, S. 1982 On the development of fluid trapping beneath deformable fluid-cell membranes. J. Fluid Mech. 121, 315–343.Google Scholar
Yiantsios, S. G. & Davis, R. H. 1990 On the buoyancy driven motion of a drop towards a rigid surface or a deformable interface. J. Fluid Mech. (Submitted).Google Scholar