Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:51:55.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coevolution of width and sinuosity in meandering rivers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2014

Esther C. Eke Open the ORCID record for Esther C. Eke [Opens in a new window] ,
M. J. Czapiga ,
E. Viparelli ,
Y. Shimizu ,
J. Imran ,
T. Sun  and
G. Parker
Esther C. Eke*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
M. J. Czapiga
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
E. Viparelli
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29201, USA
Y. Shimizu
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Hydraulic Research, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, 060-0814, Japan
J. Imran
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29201, USA
T. Sun
Affiliation:
Chevron Energy Technology Company, Houston, TX 77382, USA
G. Parker
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Department of Geology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: eeke2@illinois.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research implements a recently proposed framework for meander migration, in order to explore the coevolution of planform and channel width in a freely meandering river. In the model described here, width evolution is coupled to channel migration through two submodels, one describing bank erosion and the other describing bank deposition. Bank erosion is modelled as erosion of purely non-cohesive bank material damped by natural armouring due to basal slump blocks, and bank deposition is modelled in terms of a flow-dependent rate of vegetal encroachment. While these two submodels are specified independently, the two banks interact through the medium of the intervening channel; the morphodynamics of which is described by a fully nonlinear depth-averaged morphodynamics model. Since both banks are allowed to migrate independently, channel width is free to vary locally as a result of differential bank migration. Through a series of numerical runs, we demonstrate coevolution of local curvature, width and streamwise slope as the channel migrates over time. The correlation between the local curvature, width and bed elevation is characterized, and the nature of this relationship is explored by varying the governing parameters. The results show that, by varying a parameter representing the ratio between a reference bank erosion rate and a reference bank deposition rate, the model is able to reproduce the broad range of river width–curvature correlations observed in nature. This research represents a step towards providing general metrics for predicting width variation patterns in river systems.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: River dynamics Geophysical and Geological Flows: Sediment transport
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 760 , 10 December 2014 , pp. 127 - 174
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asahi, K., Shimizu, Y., Nelson, J. & Parker, G. 2013 Numerical simulation of river meandering with self-evolving banks. J. Geophys. Res. 118 (4), 2208–2229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASCE Task Committee on Hydraulics, Bank Mechanics and Modeling of River Width Adjustment 1998 River width adjustment. II: processes and mechanisms. J. Hydraul. Engng 124 (9), 881–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. M.1988 Computer-simulated deformation of meandering river patterns. PhD thesis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Beck, S., Harrington, R. A. & Andres, D. D.1983 Lateral channel stability of the Pembina River near Rossington, Alberta. Alberta Research Council Report No. SWE 83-2.Google Scholar
Bittner, L.1994 River bed response to channel width variation. Master thesis, Univ. of Illinois.Google Scholar
Blanckaert, K. 2009 Saturation of curvature induced secondary flow, energy losses and turbulence in sharp open-channel bends. Laboratory experiments, analysis and modeling. J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf. 114, F03015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanckaert, K. & de vriend, H. J. 2010 Meander dynamics: a 1D flow model without curvature restrictions. J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf. 115, F04011.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondeaux, P. & Seminara, G. 1985 A unified bar-bend theory of river meanders. J. Fluid Mech. 157, 449–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolla Pittaluga, M., Nobile, G. & Seminara, G. 2009 A nonlinear model for river meandering. Water Resour. Res. 45, W04432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brice, J. C. 1975 Airphoto interpretation of the form and behavior of alluvial rivers. Final report to the US Army Research Office. Durham, NC, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 10 p.Google Scholar
Brice, J.1982 Stream channel stability assessment. Report no. FHWA/RD, Federal Highway Administration, Offices of Research and Development.Google Scholar
Camporeale, C., Perona, P., Porporato, A. & Ridolfi, L. 2007 Hierarchy of models for meandering rivers and related morphodynamic processes. Rev. Geophys. 45, RG1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camporeale, C., Perucca, E. & Ridolfi, L. 2008 Significance of cutoff in meandering rivers dynamics. J. Geophys. Res. 113, F01001.Google Scholar
Colombini, M., Seminara, G. & Tubino, M. 1987 Finite amplitude alternate bars. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courant, R. E., Isaacson, E. & Rees, M. 1952 On the solution of nonlinear hyperbolic differential equations by finite differences. J. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 5, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosato, A.1990 Simulation of meandering river processes. In Communication on Hydraulic and Geotechnical Engineering, Report 90-3, Delft University of Technology, Delft, NL.Google Scholar
Darby, S. E., Rinaldi, M. & Dapporto, S. 2007 Coupled simulations for fluvial erosion and mass wasting for cohesive river banks. J. Geophys. Res. 112, F03022.Google Scholar
Darby, S. E. & Thorne, C. R. 1996 Development and testing of riverbank stability analysis. J. Hydraul. Engng 122 (8), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, J. G. & Julien, P. Y. 2010 Numerical simulation of meandering evolution. J. Hydrol. 391, 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, H. A.1950 The bed-load function for sediment transportation in open channel flows. Tech. Bull. 1026, US Dept. of the Army, Soil Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Eke, E.2013 Numerical modeling of river migration incorporating erosional and depositional bank processes. PhD thesis, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Eke, E., Parker, G. & Shimizu, Y. 2014 Numerical modeling of erosional and depositional bank processes in migrating river bends with self-formed width: morphodynamics of bar push and bank pull. J. Geophys. Res. 119 (7), 1455–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelund, F. 1974 Flow and bed topography in channel bends. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 100, 1631–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frascati, A. & Lanzoni, S. 2009 Morphodynamic regime and long-term evolution of meandering rivers. J. Geophys. Res. 114, F02002.Google Scholar
Frascati, A. & Lanzoni, S. 2010 Long-term river meandering as a part of chaotic dynamics? A contribution from mathematical modelling. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 35, 791–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frascati, A. & Lanzoni, S. 2013 A mathematical model for meandering rivers with varying width. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 118 (3), 1641–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güneralp, I. & Rhoads, B. L. 2011 Influence of floodplain erosional heterogeneity on planform complexity of meandering rivers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L14401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hack, J. T.1965 Post-glacial drainage evolution and stream geometry in the Ontonagon area, Michigan. US Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper No 504-13.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, K.1977 Computer simulation of the gradual migration of meandering channels. In Proceedings of the Hokkaido Branch, Japan Society of Civil Engineering, pp. 197–202 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Hickin, E. J. & Nanson, G. 1984 Lateral migration rates of river bends. J. Hydraul. Engng 110, 1557–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooke, J. 2003 River meander behaviour and instability: a framework for analysis. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. NS 28, 238–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooke, J. M. 2007 Spatial variability, mechanisms and propagation of change in an active meandering river. Geomorphology 84, 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooke, J. M. 2008 Temporal variations in fluvial processes on an active meandering river over a 20-year period. Geomorphology 100, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, A. 1992 Modelling channel evolution and foodplain morphology. In Floodplain Processes (ed. Anderson, M. G., Walling, D. E. & Bates, P. D.), pp. 15–62. John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Howard, A. D. 1996 Modeling channel migration and floodplain sedimentation in meandering streams. In Lowland Floodplain Rivers: Geomorphological Perspectives (ed. Carling, P. A. & Petts, G. E.), pp. 2–41. John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Howard, A. D. & Knutson, T. R. 1984 Sufficient conditions for river meandering: a simulation approach. Water Resour. Res. 20, 1659–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, S., Hino, M. & Kikkawa, H. 1976 Theoretical study on the free meandering of rivers. Proc. Japan. Soc. Civ. Engrs 255, 63–74 (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, S., Parker, G. & Sawai, K. 1981 Bend theory of river meanders. Part 1. Linear development. J. Fluid Mech. 112, 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imran, J., Parker, G. & Pirmez, C. 1999 A nonlinear model of flow in meandering submarine and subaerial channels. J. Fluid Mech. 400, 295–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannesson, H. & Parker, G. 1989 Linear theory of river meanders. In River Meandering (ed. Ikeda, S. & Parker, G.), Water Resources Monograph, vol. 12, pp. 181–213. American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlstrom, L., Gajjar, P. & Manga, M. 2013 Meander formation in supraglacial streams. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 11 (3), 1897–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitanidis, P. K. & Kennedy, J. F. 1984 Secondary current and river meander formation. J. Fluid Mech. 144, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konsoer, K.2014 Influence of riparian vegetation on near-bank flow structure and erosion rates on a large meandering river. PhD thesis, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 207p.Google Scholar
Konsoer, K. M., Rhoads, B. L., Langendoen, E. J., Johnson, K. & Ursic, M.2012 Influence of riparian vegetation on near-bank flow structure and erosion rates on a large meandering river. In Abstract EP43C-06, 2012 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, CA, 3–7 December.Google Scholar
Konsoer, K., Zinger, J. & Parker, G. 2013 Bankfull hydraulic geometry of submarine channels created by turbidity currents: relations between bankfull channel characteristics and formative flow discharge. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 118 (1), 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagasse, P., Spitz, W., Zevenbergen, L. & Zachmann, D.2004 Handbook for predicting stream meander migration. NHCRP Report 533, National Cooperative Highway Research Program.Google Scholar
Langendoen, E. J. & Simon, A. 2008 Modeling the evolution of incised streams. II: streambank erosion. J. Hydraul. Engng 134 (7), 905–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzoni, S. & Seminara, G. 2006 On the nature of meander instability. J. Geophys. Res. 111, F04006.Google Scholar
Lauer, J. W. & Parker, G. 2008 Net local removal of floodplain sediment by river meander migration. Geomorphology 96, 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, L. B. & Wolman, M. G. 1960 River meanders. Geol. Soc. America 71 (6), 769–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C., Czapiga, M. J., Eke, E. C., Viparelli, E. & Parker, G. 2014 River bankfull geometry: shear velocity is viscosity-dependent but grain size-independent. J. Hydraul Res., doi:10.1080/00221686.2014.939113.Google Scholar
Luchi, R., Bolla Pittaluga, M. & Seminara, G. 2012 Spatial width oscillations in meandering rivers at equilibrium. Water Resour. Res. 48, W05551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchi, R., Zolezzi, G. & Tubino, M. 2010 Modelling mid-channel bars in meandering channels. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 35, 902–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchi, R., Zolezzi, G. & Tubino, M. 2011 Bend theory of river meanders with spatial width variations. J. Fluid Mech. 681, 311–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, T., Parker, G. & Leuthe, D.1991 Inventory and analysis of stream meander problems in Minnesota. Project Report, St. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Laboratory, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Mosselman, E. 1998 Morphological modeling of rivers with erodible banks. Hydrol. Proc. 12, 1357–1370.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosselman, E., Shishikura, T. & Klaassen, G. J. 2000 Effect of bank stabilization on bend scour in anabranches of braided rivers. Phys. Chem. Earth B 25 (7), 699–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motta, D., Abad, J. D., Langendoen, E. J. & Garcia, M. H. 2012a A simplified 2-D model for meander migration with physically based bank evolution. Geomorphology 163–164, 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motta, D., Abad, J. D., Langendoen, E. J. & Garcia, M. H. 2012b The effects of floodplain soil heterogeneity on meander planform shape. Water Resour. Res. 48, W09518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagata, N., Hosoda, T. & Muramoto, Y. 2000 Numerical analysis of river channel processes with bank erosion. J. Hydraul. Engng 126 (4), 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. M. & Smith, J. D. 1989 Evolution and stability of erodible channel beds. In River Meandering (ed. Ikeda, S. & Parker, G.), Water Resources Monograph, vol. 12, pp. 321–377. American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottevanger, W., Blanckaert, K. & Uijttewaal, W. S. J. 2012 Processes governing the flow redistribution in sharp river bends. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 163–164, 45–55.Google Scholar
Parker, G. 1979 Hydraulic geometry of active gravel rivers. J. Hydraul. Engng 105 (9), 1185–1201.Google Scholar
Parker, G. & Andrews, E. D. 1985 Sorting of bed load sediments by flow in meander bends. Water Resour. Res. 21, 1361–1373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. & Andrews, E. D. 1986 On the time development of meander bends. J. Fluid Mech. 162, 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G., Diplas, P. & Akiyama, J. 1983 Meander bends of high amplitude. J. Hydraul. Engng ASCE 109, 1323–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G., Paola, C., Whipple, K. X. & Mohrig, D. 1998 Alluvial fans formed by channelized fluvial and sheet flow: theory. J. Hydraul. Engng 123, 985–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G., Sawai, K. & Ikeda, S. 1982 Bend theory of river meanders: part II, nonlinear deformation of finite-amplitude bends. J. Fluid Mech. 115, 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G., Shimizu, Y., Wilkerson, G. V., Eke, E. C., Abad, J. D., Lauer, J. W., Paola, C., Dietrich, W. E. & Voller, V. R. 2011 A new framework for modeling the migration of meandering rivers. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 36, 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G., Wilcock, P. R., Paola, C., Dietrich, W. E. & Pitlick, J. 2007 Physical basis for quasi-universal relations describing bankfull hydraulic geometry of single-thread gravel bed rivers. J. Geophys. Res. 112, F04005.Google Scholar
Peyret, A. B.2011 Morphodynamics and geometry of channels, turbidites and bedforms. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, J. E. 1994 Channel adjustments to changing discharges, Powder River between Moorhead and Broadus, Montana. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 106, 1494–1501.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repetto, R., Tubino, M. & Paola, C. 2002 Planimetric instability of channels with variable width. J. Fluid Mech. 457, 79–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozovskii, I. L.1957 Flow of Water in Bends of Open Channels. Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR, Kiev 233 pp (translated from Russian by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1961).Google Scholar
Rüther, N. & Olsen, N. R. B. 2007 Modelling free-forming meander evolution in a laboratory channel using three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics. Geomorphology 89, 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seminara, G. 2006 Meanders. J. Fluid Mech. 554, 271–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seminara, G. & Solari, L. 1998 Finite amplitude bed deformations in totally and partially transporting wide channel bends. Water Resour. Res. 34 (6), 1585–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seminara, G., Zolezzi, G., Tubino, M. & Zardi, D. 2001 Downstream and upstream influence in river meandering, Part 2. Planimetric development. J. Fluid Mech. 438, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. B.2012 Geomorphology of a coastal sand-bed river: lower Trinity River, Texas. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Smith, D. & McLean, S. R. 1984 A model of flow in meandering streams. Water Resour. Res. 20, 1301–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solari, L. & Seminara, G.2005 On width variations in river meanders. In Symp. on River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics, Urbana, IL, 4–7 October.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillwater Science 2007 Physical modeling experiments to guide river restoration projects: channel-floodplain redesign experiments. Report Prepared for CALFED Ecosystem Restoration Program (Contract No. ERP-02D-P55).Google Scholar
Stolum, H. H. 1996 River meandering as a self-organized process. Science 271, 1710–1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struiksma, N., Olesen, K. W., Flokstra, C. & de Vriend, H. J. 1985 Bed deformations in curved alluvial channels. J. Hydraul Res. 23, 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, T., Meaking, P., Jossang, T. & Schwarz, K. 1996 A simulation model for meandering rivers. Water Resour. Res. 32 (9), 2937–2954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, M.1965 Considerations about non-steady bed-load transport in open channels. In Proceedings of 11th Congress, International Association for Hydraulic Research, Leningrad, pp. 381–388.Google Scholar
Wilkerson, G. V. & Parker, G. 2011 Physical basis for quasi-universal relations describing bankfull hydraulic geometry of sand-bed rivers. J. Hydraul. Engng 137 (7), 739–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, F.-C., Shao, Y.-C. & Chen, Y.-C. 2011 Quantifying the forcing effect of channel width variations on free bars: morphodynamic modeling based on characteristic dissipative Galerkin scheme. J. Geophys. Res. 116, F03023.Google Scholar
Wu, F.-C. & Yeh, T.-H. 2005 Forced bars induced by variations of channel width: implications for incipient bifurcation. J. Geophys. Res. 110, F02009.Google Scholar
Zolezzi, G., Luchi, R. & Tubino, M. 2012 Modeling morphodynamic processes in meandering rivers with spatial width variations. Rev. Geophys. 50, 24 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zolezzi, G. & Seminara, G. 2001 Downstream and upstream influence in river meandering. Part 1. General theory and application of overdeepening. J. Fluid Mech. 438, 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar