Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T17:35:03.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Buoyancy-driven motion of a gas bubble through viscous liquid in a round tube

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

JAMES Q. FENG*
Affiliation:
Cardiovascular R & D, Boston Scientific Corporation, Three Scimed Place C-150, Maple Grove, MN 55311, USAjames.feng@bsci.com

Abstract

The steady axisymmetric flow of viscous liquid relative to a gas bubble due to its buoyancy-driven motion in a round tube is computed by solving the nonlinear Navier–Stokes equations using a Galerkin finite-element method with a boundary-fitted mesh. When the bubble is relatively small compared with the tube size (e.g. the volume-equivalent radius of the bubble is less than a quarter of the tube radius R), the bubble exhibits similar behaviour to one moving in an extended liquid, developing a spherical-cap shape with increasing Reynolds number (Re) if the capillary number is not too small. The long-bubble (also known as a Taylor bubble) characteristics can be observed with bubbles of volume-equivalent radius greater than the tube radius, especially when the surface tension effect is relatively weak (e.g. for Weber number We greater than unity). The computed values of Froude number Fr for most cases agree well with the correlation formulae derived from experimental data for long bubbles, and even with (short) bubbles of volume-equivalent radius three-quarters of the tube radius. All of the computed surface profiles of long bubbles exhibit a prolate-like nose shape, yet various tail shapes can be obtained by adjusting the parameter values of Re and We. At large Weber number (e.g. We=10), the bubble tail forms a concave profile with a gas ‘cup’ developed at small Re and a ‘skirt’ at large Re with sharply curved rims. For We≤1, the bubble tail profile appears rounded without large local curvatures, although a slightly concave tail may develop at large Re. non-uniform annular film adjacent to the tube wall is commonly observed when Weber number is small, especially for bubbles of volume <3πR3, suggesting that the surface tension effect can play a complicated role. Nonetheless the computed value of Fr is found to be generally independent of the bubble length for bubbles of volume-equivalent radius greater than the tube radius. If the bubble length reaches about 2.5 tube radii, the value of its frontal radius becomes basically the same as that for long bubbles of much larger volume. An examination of the distribution of the z-component of traction along the bubble surface reveals the basic mechanism for long bubbles rising at a terminal velocity that is independent of bubble volume.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barr, G. 1926 The air bubble viscometer. Phil. Mag. (7), 1, 395405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhaga, D. & Weber, M. E. 1981 Bubbles in viscous liquids: shapes, wakes and velocities. J. Fluid Mech. 105, 6185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozzi, L. A., Feng, J. Q., Scott, T. C. & Pearlstein, A. J. 1997 Steady axisymmetric motion of deformable drops falling or rising through a homovisous fluid in a tube at intermediate Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 336, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brignell, A. S. 1973 The deformation of a liquid drop at small Reynolds number. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 26, 99107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, F. P. 1961 The motion of long bubbles in tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 166188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. A. S. 1965 The mechanics of large gas bubbles in tubes. Can. J. Chem. Engng Q2, 217223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugg, J. D., Mack, K. & Rezkallah, K. S. 1998 A numerical model of Taylor bubbles rising through stagnant liquids in vertical tubes. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 24, 271281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugg, J. D. & Saad, G. A. 2002 The velocity field around a Taylor bubble rising in a stagnant viscous fluid: numerical and experimental results. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 28, 791803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, J. B. L. M. & Guedes de Carvalho, J. R. F. 1988 An experimental study of the wake of gas slugs rising in liquids. J. Fluid Mech. 196, 2737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, M. S. 1996 Roll coating flows in rigid and deformable gaps. PhD thesis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Christodoulou, K. N. 1989 Computational physics of slide coating flow. PhD thesis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Christodoulou, K. N. & Scriven, L. E. 1992 Discretization of free surface flows and other moving boundary problems. J. Comput. Phys. 99, 3955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, A. & Issa, R. I. 1997 A numerical model of slug flow in vertical tubes. Comput. Fluids 26, 395415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clift, R. C., Grace, J. R. & Weber, M. E. 1978 Bubbles, Drops and Particles. Academic.Google Scholar
Collins, R. 1965 A simple model of the plane gas bubble in a finite liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 763771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, R. 1966 A second approximation for velocity of a large gas bubble rising in an infinite liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 469480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R. M. & Taylor, G. I. 1950 The mechanics of large bubbles rising through extended liquids and through liquids in tubes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 200, 375390.Google Scholar
Dumitrescue, D. T. 1943 Stromung nd einer luftbluse in senkrechten rohr. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 23 (3), 139149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre, J. & Liné, A. 1992 Modelling of two-phase slug flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 2146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, J. Q. 2007 A spherical-cap bubble moving at terminal velocity in a viscous liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 347371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funada, T., Joseph, D. D., Maehara, T. & Yamashita, S. 2005 Ellipsoidal model of the rise of a Taylor bubble in a round tube. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 31, 473491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A. H. 1913 Long air bubbles in a vertical tube. Phil. Mag. (6), 26, 952965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberman, W. L. & Sayre, R. M. 1958 Motion of rigid and fluid spheres in Stationary and moving liquids inside cylindrical tubes. David Taylor Model Basin Report 1143.Google Scholar
Hnat, J. G. & Buckmaster, J. D. 1976 Spherical cap bubbles and skirt formation. Phys. Fluids 19, 182194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, P. 1976 Frontal solution program for unsymmetric matrices. Intl J. Num. Meth. Engng 10, 379399 (and corrigendum 11, 1055 (1977)).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, D. D. 2003 Rise velocity of a spherical-cap bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 488, 213223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kistler, S. F. & Scriven, L. E. 1984 Coating flows. In Computational Analysis of Polymer Processing (ed. Pearson, J. R. A. and Richardson, S. M.), pp. 243299. Applied Science.Google Scholar
Liberzon, D., Shemer, L. & Barnea, D. 2006 Upward-propagating capillary waves on the surface of short Taylor bubbles. Phys. Fluids 18, 048103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, Z.-S. & Dukler, A. E. 1990 The motion of Taylor bubbles in vertical tubes I. A numerical simulation for the shape and rise velocity of Taylor bubbles in stagnant and flowing liquids J. Comput. Phys. 91, 132160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, Z.-S. & Dukler, A. E. 1991 The motion of Taylor bubbles in vertical tubes II. Experimental data and simulations for laminar and tubulent flow. Chem. Engng Sci. 46, 20552064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. W. 1959 The rise of a gas bubble in a viscous liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 113130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. W. 1965 The velocity of rise of distorted gas bubbles in a liquid of small viscosity. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 749766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukundakrishnan, K., Quan, S., Eckmann, D. M. & Ayyaswamy, P. S. 2007 Numerical study of wall effects on buoyant gas-bubble rise in a liquid-filled finite cylinder. Phys. Rev. E 76, 036308.Google Scholar
Nigmatulin, T.-R. & Bonetto, F. J. 1997 Shape of Taylor bubbles in vertical tubes. Intl Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 24, 11771185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, J. M. & Rheinoldt, W. C. 1970 Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables. Academic.Google Scholar
Reinelt, D. A. 1987 The penetration of a finger into a viscous fluid in a channel and tube. J. Fluid Mech. 175, 557565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryskin, G. & Leal, L. G. 1984 Numerical solution of free-boundary problems in fluid mechanics. Part 2. Buoyancy-driven motion of a gas bubble through a quiescent liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Santos, J. M. 1991 Two-phase cocurrent downflow through constricted passages. PhD thesis, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Strang, G. & Fix, G. J. 1973 An Analysis of the Finite Element Method. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Taha, T. & Cui, Z. F. 2006 CFD modelling of slug flow in vertical tubes. Chem. Engng Sci. 61, 676687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, T. D. & Acrivos, A. 1964 On the deformation and drag of a falling viscous drop at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 166176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomiyama, A., Sou, A. & Sakaguichi, T. 1996 Numerical simulation of a Taylor bubbles in a stagnant liquid inside a vertical pipe. JSME Intl J. B39, 517523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viana, F., Pardo, R., Yánez, R., Trallero, J. L. & Joseph, D. D. 2003 Universal correlation for the rise velocity of long gas bubbles in round pipes. J. Fluid Mech. 494, 379398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, G. B. 1969 One Dimensional Two-Phase Flow. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wegener, P. P. & Parlange, J.-Y. 1973 Spherical-cap bubbles. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 5, 79100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. T. & Beardmore, R.-H. 1962 The velocity of rise of single cylindrical air bubbles through liquids contained in vertical tubes. Chem. Engng Sci. 17, 351361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zukoski, E. E. 1966 Influence of viscosity, surface tension, and inclination angle on motion of long bubbles in closed tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 821837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar