Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

An improved model of near-inertial wave dynamics

  • Olivier Asselin (a1) and William R. Young (a1)

Abstract

The YBJ equation (Young & Ben Jelloul, J. Marine Res., vol. 55, 1997, pp. 735–766) provides a phase-averaged description of the propagation of near-inertial waves (NIWs) through a geostrophic flow. YBJ is obtained via an asymptotic expansion based on the limit $\mathit{Bu}\rightarrow 0$ , where $\mathit{Bu}$ is the Burger number of the NIWs. Here we develop an improved version, the YBJ+ equation. In common with an earlier improvement proposed by Thomas, Smith & Bühler (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 817, 2017, pp. 406–438), YBJ+ has a dispersion relation that is second-order accurate in $\mathit{Bu}$ . (YBJ is first-order accurate.) Thus both improvements have the same formal justification. But the dispersion relation of YBJ+ is a Padé approximant to the exact dispersion relation and with $\mathit{Bu}$ of order unity this is significantly more accurate than the power-series approximation of Thomas et al. (2017). Moreover, in the limit of high horizontal wavenumber $k\rightarrow \infty$ , the wave frequency of YBJ+ asymptotes to twice the inertial frequency $2f$ . This enables solution of YBJ+ with explicit time-stepping schemes using a time step determined by stable integration of oscillations with frequency $2f$ . Other phase-averaged equations have dispersion relations with frequency increasing as $k^{2}$ (YBJ) or $k^{4}$ (Thomas et al. 2017): in these cases stable integration with an explicit scheme becomes impractical with increasing horizontal resolution. The YBJ+ equation is tested by comparing its numerical solutions with those of the Boussinesq and YBJ equations. In virtually all cases, YBJ+ is more accurate than YBJ. The error, however, does not go rapidly to zero as the Burger number characterizing the initial condition is reduced: advection and refraction by geostrophic eddies reduces in the initial length scale of NIWs so that $\mathit{Bu}$ increases with time. This increase, if unchecked, would destroy the approximation. We show, however, that dispersion limits the damage by confining most of the wave energy to low  $\mathit{Bu}$ . In other words, advection and refraction by geostrophic flows does not result in a strong transfer of initially near-inertial energy out of the near-inertial frequency band.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Email address for correspondence: oasselin@ucsd.edu

References

Hide All
Asselin, O., Bartello, P. & Straub, D. N. 2018 On Boussinesq dynamics near the tropopause. J. Atmos. Sci. 75 (2), 571585.
Asselin, R. 1972 Frequency filter for time integrations. Mon. Weath. Rev. 100 (6), 487490.
Danioux, E., Klein, P. & Rivière, P. 2008 Propagation of wind energy into the deep ocean through a fully turbulent mesoscale eddy field. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38 (10), 22242241.
Danioux, E., Vanneste, J. & Bühler, O. 2015 On the concentration of near-inertial waves in anticyclones. J. Fluid Mech. 773, R2.
D’Asaro, E. A., Eriksen, C. C., Levine, M. D., Paulson, C. A., Niiler, P. P. & Meurs, P. V. 1995 Upper-ocean inertial currents forced by a strong storm. Part I. Data and comparisons with linear theory. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 25, 29092936.
Gill, A. E. 1984 On the behavior of internal waves in the wakes of storms. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 14 (7), 11291151.
Klein, P. & Llewellyn Smith, S. G. 2001 Horizontal dispersion of near-inertial oscillations in a turbulent mesoscale eddy field. J. Mar. Res. 59, 697723.
Klein, P., Llewellyn Smith, S. G. & Lapeyre, G. 2004 Organization of near-inertial energy by an eddy field. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 130, 11531166.
Klein, P. & Treguier, A. M. 1995 Dispersion of wind-induced inertial waves by a barotropic jet. J. Mar. Res. 53 (1), 122.
Kunze, E. 1985 Near inertial wave propagation in geostrophic shear. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 15, 544565.
Lee, D.-K. & Niiler, P. P. 1998 The inertial chimney: the near-inertial energy drainage from the ocean surface to the deep layer. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 103 (C4), 75797591.
Mooers, C. N. K. 1975 Several effects of a baroclinic current on the cross-stream propagation of inertial-internal waves. Geophys. Fluid Dyn. 6, 245275.
Pollard, R. T. 1980 Properties of near-surface inertial oscillations. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 10 (3), 385398.
Roberts, A. J. 1985 An introduction to the technique of reconstitution. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 16 (6), 12431257.
Rocha, C. B., Wagner, G. L. & Young, W. R. 2018 Stimulated generation: extraction of energy from balanced flow by near-inertial waves. J. Fluid Mech. 847, 417451.
Salmon, R. 2016 Variational treatment of inertia–gravity waves interacting with a quasi-geostrophic mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 809, 502529.
Thomas, J., Smith, K. S. & Bühler, O. 2017 Near-inertial wave dispersion by geostrophic flows. J. Fluid Mech. 817, 406438.
Wagner, G. L. & Young, W. R. 2016 A three-component model for the coupled evolution of near-inertial waves, quasi-geostrophic flow and the near-inertial second harmonic. J. Fluid Mech. 802, 806837.
Xie, J.-H. & Vanneste, J. 2015 A generalised-Lagrangian-mean model of the interactions between near-inertial waves and mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 774, 143169.
Young, W. R. & Ben Jelloul, M. 1997 Propagation of near-inertial oscillations through a geostrophic flow. J. Mar. Res. 55 (4), 735766.
Zhai, X., Greatbatch, R. J. & Zhao, J. 2005 Enhanced vertical propagation of storm-induced near-inertial energy in an eddying ocean channel model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L18602.
MathJax
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see http://www.mathjax.org.

JFM classification

An improved model of near-inertial wave dynamics

  • Olivier Asselin (a1) and William R. Young (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed