Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T04:59:49.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analytical model for asymmetric Mach reflection configuration in steady flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2019

Shobhan Roy Open the ORCID record for Shobhan Roy [Opens in a new window]  and
Rajesh Gopalapillai Open the ORCID record for Rajesh Gopalapillai [Opens in a new window]
Shobhan Roy
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600036, India
Rajesh Gopalapillai*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600036, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: rajesh@ae.iitm.ac.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analytical model is presented for the configuration of Mach reflection (MR) due to the interaction of two-dimensional steady supersonic flow over asymmetric wedges. The present asymmetric MR model is an extension of an earlier model for the symmetric MR configuration. The overall Mach reflection (oMR) in the asymmetric wedge configuration is analysed as a combination of upper and lower half-domains of symmetric reflection configurations. Suitable assumptions are made to close the combined set of equations. The subsonic pocket downstream of the Mach stem is taken to be oriented along an average inclination, based on the streamline deflections by the Mach stem at the triple points. This assumption is found to give satisfactory results for all types of oMR configurations. The oMR configuration is predicted for all types of reflections such as direct Mach reflection (DiMR), stationary Mach reflection (StMR) and inverse Mach reflection (InMR). The reflection configuration and Mach stem shape given by the model for various sets of wedge angles, especially those giving rise to InMR, have been predicted and validated with the available numerical and experimental data. The von Neumann criterion for oMR is accurately predicted by this model. The asymmetric Mach stem profile is well captured. The variation of Mach stem height with wedge angle is also analysed and it is found that simplification of an asymmetric MR to a symmetric MR leads to over-prediction of the Mach stem height and hence the extent of the subsonic region.

JFM classification

Compressible Flows: Compressible Flows Compressible Flows: Gas dynamics Compressible Flows: Shock waves
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 863 , 25 March 2019 , pp. 242 - 268
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azevedo, D. J.1989 Analytic prediction of shock patterns in a high-speed, wedge-bounded duct. PhD thesis, State University of New York, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Azevedo, D. J. & Liu, C. S. 1993 Engineering approach to the prediction of shock patterns in bounded high-speed flows. AIAA J. 31 (1), 83–90.10.2514/3.11322Google Scholar
Bai, C. Y. & Wu, Z. N. 2017 Size and shape of shock waves and slipline for Mach reflection in steady flow. J. Fluid Mech. 818, 116–140.10.1017/jfm.2017.139Google Scholar
Ben-Dor, G. 2007 Shock Wave Reflection Phenomena. Springer.Google Scholar
Gao, B. & Wu, Z. N. 2010 A study of the flow structure for Mach reflection in steady supersonic flow. J. Fluid Mech. 656, 29–50.10.1017/S0022112010001011Google Scholar
Henderson, L. F. 1989 On the refraction of shock waves. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 365–386.10.1017/S0022112089000170Google Scholar
Henderson, L. F. & Lozzi, A. 1975 Experiments on transition of Mach reflexion. J. Fluid Mech. 68 (1), 139–155.10.1017/S0022112075000730Google Scholar
Hornung, H. G. & Mouton, C. A. 2008 Some more on transition between regular and Mach reflection of shock waves in steady flow. In 38th Fluid Dyn. Conf. Exhib., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Hornung, H. G., Oertel, H. & Sandeman, R. J. 1979 Transition to Mach reflexion of shock waves in steady and pseudosteady flow with and without relaxation. J. Fluid Mech. 90 (3), 541–560.10.1017/S002211207900238XGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, M. S., Ben-Dor, G., Elperin, T., Kudryavtsev, A. N. & Khotyanovsky, D. V. 2002 The reflection of asymmetric shock waves in steady flows: a numerical investigation. J. Fluid Mech. 469, 71–87.10.1017/S0022112002001799Google Scholar
Li, H. & Ben-Dor, G. 1996 Oblique-shock/expansion-fan interaction – analytical solution. AIAA J. 34 (2), 418–421.10.2514/3.13081Google Scholar
Li, H. & Ben-Dor, G. 1997 A parametric study of Mach reflection in steady flows. J. Fluid Mech. 341, 101–125.10.1017/S0022112097005375Google Scholar
Li, H., Chpoun, A. & Ben-Dor, G. 1999 Analytical and experimental investigations of the reflection of asymmetric shock waves in steady flows. J. Fluid Mech. 390, 25–43.10.1017/S0022112099005169Google Scholar
Mouton, C. A.2007 Transition between regular reflection and mach reflection in the dual-solution domain. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
Mouton, C. A. & Hornung, H. G. 2007 Mach stem height and growth rate predictions. AIAA J. 45 (8), 1977–1987.10.2514/1.27460Google Scholar
Mouton, C. A. & Hornung, H. G. 2008 Experiments on the mechanism of inducing transition between regular and Mach reflection. Phys. Fluids 20 (126103), 1–11.10.1063/1.3042261Google Scholar
Naidoo, K. & Skews, B. W. 2014 Dynamic transition from Mach to regular reflection of shock waves in a steady flow. J. Fluid Mech. 750, 385–400.10.1017/jfm.2014.288Google Scholar
Roy, S. & Rajesh, G. 2017 Analytical prediction of Mach stem height for asymmetric wedge reflection in 2-D steady flows. In 31st Int. Symp. Shock Waves. Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
Tao, Y., Fan, X. & Zhao, Y. 2015 Flow visualization for the evolution of the slipstream in steady shock reflection. J. Vis. 18, 21–24.10.1007/s12650-014-0236-zGoogle Scholar
Tao, Y., Liu, W., Fan, X., Xiong, B., Yu, J. & Sun, M. 2017 A study of the asymmetric shock reflection configurations in steady flows. J. Fluid Mech. 825, 1–15.10.1017/jfm.2017.280Google Scholar
Von-Neumann, J. 1943 Oblique reflection of shocks. In Explos. Res. Rep. 12, Navy Department, Bureau of Ordinance.Google Scholar
Von-Neumann, J. 1945 Refraction, intersection and reflection of shock waves. In NAVORD Re 203-45, Navy Department, Bureau of Ordinance.Google Scholar